TIFFANY & CO. ® Introduction Tiffany & Co. is a leading US luxury jewelry company. For more than 150 years‚ Tiffany & Co. have been designing exquisite jewelry that highlights the incomparable beauty of diamonds. The designations TIFFANY ® and TIFFANY & CO. ® are the principal trademarks of Tiffany‚ as well as serving as trade names. Through its subsidiaries‚ the Company has obtained and is the proprietor of trademark registrations for TIFFANY ® and TIFFANY & CO. ®‚ as well as the TIFFANY BLUE
Premium Jewellery Diamond Engagement ring
Some people believe that co-education should not be there. In their opinion this can lead to attraction between boys and girls which are neither good for their health‚ nor character‚ nor studies. Some other people are of the view that co-education can bring about a healthy competition between boys and girls. It can mean better discipline since in the presence of girls the boys will not talk irrelevantly or obscenely in the class. The most potent argument advanced by co-education lovers is that
Premium Gender Classroom Education
RENO v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION US Supreme Court‚ 1997 1. Claim: Attorney General Janet Reno‚ the appellant appealed directly to the Supreme Court as provided for by the Act’s special review provisions against the appellee‚ ACLU. 2. Facts: The 1996 Federal Communications Decency Act sought to protect minors from “indecent” and offensive Internet materials. The Act made it a crime to transmit obscene or indecent messages over the Internet. Immediately after the CDA became law‚ twenty
Premium Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution United States
Finally‚ on July 27‚ 2000‚ Marie Villette (plaintiff) had a carport installed from Sheldorado Aluminum Product (defendant). The covering would collapse six months later on top of the plaintiffs Mercedes Benz. All the plaintiff is requesting is the $3‚000 she has spent on the carport. Ms. Villette filed a lawsuit opposing Sheldorado expecting the return of her $3000. Ms. Villette and Sheldorado‚ had no formal written contract‚ however‚ there was a bill of sale; it is dated 11 July‚ 2000. Ms. Villette
Premium Contract Law Contract law
Background and Problem definition: Jones-Blair is privately held corporation which produces architectural paint coatings and markets them under Jones Blair brand name. Addition to that it also sells paint sundries under Jones Blair brand name even though these items are not manufactured by them. Apart from these the corporation also operates on OEM coating division. The problem in front of the company is to decide where and how to deploy corporate marketing efforts among the various architectural
Premium Marketing Sales Variable cost
Plaintiffs making a claim under Rule 10b-5 must plead scienter by “stat[ing] with particularity facts giving rise to a strong inference that the defendant acted with the required state of mind.” Livid‚ 403 F.3d at 1055 (internal quotation marks omitted). The higher pleading standards incorporates the scienter standard in the federal rules that requires the circumstances constituting the fraud be pled with particularity‚ but allows the plaintiff to plead the state of mind generally. Fed. R. Civ. P
Premium Pleading Plaintiff Complaint
Course: General Management and Organization Behavior Date: October 14th‚ 2013 TIFFANY & CO. THE COMPANY OVERVIEW Tiffany & Company (known colloquially as Tiffany or Tiffany ’s) is an American multinational and one of the world’s premier luxury jewelry and retailers. It is a public company having headquarters in New York City‚ NY‚ United States. Tiffany sells jewelry‚ sterling silver‚ crystal‚ stationery‚ fragrances‚ personal accessories‚ as well as some leather goods. The company
Premium Brand Luxury good LVMH
non-client in order for that auditing firm to be liable for any damages done unto the third party. In the Ultramares v. Touche case‚ the judges found that a liability arose out of a duty that Touche‚ the accounting firm‚ owed to the non-client‚ Ultramares. Touche certified that their client‚ for whom they were performing the audit‚ was solvent when in fact it was not. In the case‚ it is pointed out that Touche knew their client was borrowing at large sums and required “certified balance sheets for
Premium Tort Accountant Audit
Men and women have always had specific roles that are played when starting a family. Women being viewed as the fulltime house worker‚ and men as the income support. Hope Edelman writes on her essay “The Myth of Co- Parenting: How It Was Supposed To Be. How It Was” how her martial experience was conflicted with ingrained gender roles. The role women played in a household‚ as oppose to the role women currently now play in the household are very different. Hence‚ the typical stigma that the man is the
Premium Gender role Family
CLAW1001: Commercial Transactions A Case Analysis Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 44 Submitted by: Sindhuja Shankar SID: 305 127 950 3/10/2007 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Case Summary 3 Facts 3 Issues 3 Ratio 3 Decision 4 Critical Analysis 4 Commercial Implications 5 Legal Implications 6 Conclusion 6 Bibliography 7 Appendix † Research Plan 8 Introduction The case Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd[1] confirms the long held doctrine that employers are vicariously
Premium Law Agency Employment