Lourda Finn 26/05/2014 The Judgement Title: Director of Public Prosecutions –v- Tully. Neutral Citation: [2009] IECC 1. Date of Delivery: 07/13/2009. Court: Circuit Court. Composition of Court: Judgement by: White Michael J. Status of Judgement: Approved. 1. Introduction to Court Report. The background evidence in this case was first heard in the Navan District Court on 14/5/2007. Mr Kevin Tully was convicted under the Road Traffic Act 1961. He was fined £500 and the automatic
Premium Law
the Roman law made Christianity illegal. If you were a Christian‚ and the Romans found out‚ you would be persecuted. It took about 200 years to make it legal‚ and we can thank Constantine. Constantine was a huge influence on the Christians and he helped them thrive. The Christians were better off after Constantine declared Christianity legal because he issued the Edict of Milan‚ which granted freedom of worship to Christians in the Roman Empire. They could no longer be punished by law for practicing
Premium Roman Empire Christianity
PART A Sita is able to claim personal injury damages under an action in tort for negligence. The principle of these damages is restituo in inegrum‚ which is based on the principle restoring the plaintiff to the position they were in before the tort took place (Sharman)1. These damages are presented on a once and for all basis as a lump sum with the date of assessment being that of the date of trial. 1. Economic Loss Economic loss is under Divison 2 of the Civil Liability Act2 (CLA). Under
Premium Contract Tort Damages
Legal Maxim 91: “A person is bound by his own admission” The meaning of this maxim is that a person who makes an admission is indicted pursuant to his acknowledgement and what he has acknowledge shall be claimed from him as long as the acknowledgement conforms to its conditions of validity. This statement can be simplified by saying that the person is responsible for what he say as long as it follows the condition of validity. The condition of validity is for the person making the admission and
Premium Common law Qur'an Islam
Topic: Legal Marijuana Specific Purpose: To persuade my audience how United States can benefit from marijuana if it can be legalized Thesis: The legalization of marijuana would help get the economy going again. Despite great efforts by the federal government against marijuana i. INTRODUCTION A. Is marijuana as bad as society makes it out to be? Since the 1930’s marijuana has been illegal in the United States. That being said it’s somehow America’s number one cash crop. Users of the drug
Premium United States Cannabis Legality of cannabis by country
Legal Brief Facts summary Mr. Potbelly holds a garage sale at his home. Mr. Slim Jim stops by the sale and upon noticing a rare piece of art pottery offers a price of $100 for the art that is marked $250. Mr. Potbelly accepts Mr. Slim Jim’s offer. Mr. Potbelly informs Mr. Slim Jim he is selling his home because he is moving up north because he has lost his job. Mr. Slim Jim asks how much he is selling it for and Mr. Potbelly informs him he is thinking $75‚000. Mr. Slim Jim offers him $70‚000
Premium Contract
Key Constraints to Housing Development Finance in Nigeria. A TERM PAPER DEPARTMENT OF ESTATE MANAGEMENT AND VALUATION SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES; FEDERAL POLYTECHNIC‚ NASARAWA‚ NASARAWA STATE e-mail: fpnas@yahoo.com‚ Tel.: +234 – 047-66701‚ 66707 047 – 66238 (DL) JULY‚ 2012 BY UZOKWE‚ LAWRENCE CHIDI Department of Estate Management and Valuation School of Environmental Studies The Federal Polytechnic Nasarawa‚ Nasarawa State. Email: Uzokwe_Lawrence@Yahoo.Com‚ 08059128950 ABSTRACT
Premium Real estate Mortgage Bank
Case Summary Union of India v. Raghubir Singh SCHOOL OF LAW CHRIST UNIVERSITY BANGALORE- 560028 2012-2013 NAME: VIVEK.K.R REGISTER NO: 1216044 CLASS: 1 BA LLB A Identification Name of the case: Union of India (UOI) and Anr. Vs. Raghubir Singh (Dead) by Lrs. Etc. Jurisdiction: Appeal From the Judgment and Order dated 06.12.1984 of the Delhi High Court in Regular First Appeal Nos. 113 and 114 of 1968. Level of the deciding Court: Supreme Court Date of decision: 16.05.1989 Equivalent
Premium Common law Jury Supreme Court of the United States
money with their ’resources’‚ which will prevent general public from living in ’an more enjoyable’ environment? <br> <br>This is obviously a conflict of interest. The right should be granted to the side with more social benefits. For example‚ if legal prostitution brings the social‚ says‚ $100 and at the same time causes $50 harms to general public‚ the right should be granted to prostitutes. <br> <br>One may argue that it is very difficult to determine which side brings larger social benefits
Premium Prostitution Sexual intercourse Human sexuality
MEMORANDUM OF LAW TO: Supervising Attorney FROM: Polly Paralegal RE: Jane Doe’s Asylum Case DATE: August 16‚ 2000 Questions Presented 1. Whether Jane‚ a minor‚ would be able to file a petition for asylum on her own behalf? 2. Whether Billy‚ the minors uncle and non-custodial adult‚ would be able to file a petition for asylum on behalf of Jane‚ if being a minor is an issue? 3. Whether Jane can use claims of physical abuse and being used as a governmental propaganda tool as grounds
Premium United States Law of the United States Parent