LEGAL BASES OF PHILIPPINE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM MAJOR LEGAL BASES The Philippine Constitutions 1. 1935 CONST. Article XIV Section 5 2. 1973 CONST. Article XV Section 8 (1-8) 3. 1987 CONST. Article XIV Sections 1-5(5) THE 1987 CONSTITUTIONS Article XIV Sections 1-5(5) Section 1. The state shall protect and promote the right of all the citizens to quality education at all levels and shall take appropriate steps to make such education accessible to all. Section 2. The state shall:
Premium High school Higher education Secondary education
defendant wants to buy that land for many days. 6. That the plaintiff alaways refuses to sell that land. 7. That the defendant on 10th June 2011 forcefully take over the possassion of the land. 8. That thebdefendants does not possess any legal document to claim the land. Now the plaintiff most respectfully prays as follows: 1. Give a decree under Sec. 8 of the Specific Relief Act 1877 for the recovery of the possession of the property. 2. Cost for suit in favor of the plaintiff
Premium Plaintiff Injunction Civil procedure
ACCT90015 Legal Issues for Accountants Week 4 This Week Page Title / heading goes here Topics • What is a contract • Formation of a contract • Equitable estoppel Contract Page Title / heading goes here Meaning • An agreement that the law recognises as a contract Formation of a Contract Page Title / heading goes here Requirements • Offer • Acceptance • Consideration • Certainty of terms • Intention to create legal relations • Formalities Offer Page Title /
Premium Contract
effectiveness of legal and non- legal mechanisms in dealing with children and young people” There are many legal and non- legal mechanisms‚ which seek to gain justice for children and young people. The effectiveness of these mechanisms changes with different situations. There have been many law reforms‚ which have proved to be effective; although there are many areas‚ which need improvement. An issue that will be further discussed in this essay is young drivers and the law. The legal and non-legal mechanisms
Premium Childhood Child Law
security) c. Provide for common defense d. Promote general welfare e. Secure liberty 4. Functions of courts a. To resolve disputes/controversies b. To modify behavior c. To make public policy (setting judicial/legal precedents) d. To compensate for harm/injury 5. Kinds of law a. Constitutional i. Law deriving from the supreme court and lower courts’ implementation and interpretation of the constitution b. Common i. “judge made”
Premium Law Jury
Legal Memorandum PA 205 Final Project By: Jazmin Howard To: XXXXXXX From: XXXXX Date: July 15‚ 2014 Re: Natalie Attired v. New Mexico Employment Security Board Memorandum of Law Statement of Facts: In July of 2010‚ the Plaintiff‚ Natalie Attired‚ filed for unemployment with the New Mexico Employment Security Board; her claim was denied and she was deemed ineligible due to being terminated for misconduct. In June of 2010‚ Plaintiff Natalie Attired was fired from her job at Biddy’s
Premium Employment New Mexico Unemployment
YEAR 11 LEGAL STUDIES EXTENDED RESPONSE ITEM 1.1 TOPIC: The Legal System Australian Constitution STUDENT: Grace Fenwick TEACHER: Mr Keehn (BSK) ISSUE DATE: 27/02/15 DUE DATE: 30/03/15 CONTENTS Contents Nature of Australian Constitution 3 Parts of Australian Constitution 3 Legal Mechanisms of the Constitution 3 Powers of the Australian Constitution 3 Resolution of Constitutional Difficulties 3 Protection of Citizens 3 Section 51 Powers 3 Individual Citizen’s Legal Rights
Premium Law Constitution United States Constitution
A. Liability Under Partnership Joe Roberts and Dr. Donald Jones have a general partnership over Tyler’s Sports Bar & Grill. This is‚ "an association of two or more entities to carry on a business a co-owners " (Hodge‚ 400). Roberts and Jones did not create a partnership agreement when opening the business. Off of the record they agreed that Jones would supply all of the start up money for the business and remain a silent partner while Roberts ran and managed the Bar and Grill. Dan Davidson was
Premium Corporation Limited liability partnership Partnership
Final Written Assignment 9 Internal Legal Memorandum of Law MEMORANDUM TO: Chief Prosecuting Attorney FROM: DATE: December 4‚ 2010 RE: Charging Bob and Susan Tuttle of Negligent Supervision Question Presented Did Joseph Haney effectively simulate a deadly weapon and create a life-threatening environment‚ sufficient to satisfy the Arizona armed robbery statute‚ by thrusting his hand into a pocket and telling the store clerk that it was a "holdup" and to "[l]ie still if you
Premium Robbery Theft
555 P.2d 696 Supreme Court of New Mexico. Zelma M. MITCHELL‚ Plaintiff-Appellee‚ v. LOVINGTON GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER‚ INC.‚ Defendant-Appellant. No. 10847.Oct. 27‚ 1976. Appeal was taken from an order of the District Court‚ Bernalillo County‚ Richard B. Traub‚ D.J.‚ reversing a decision of the Unemployment Security Commission and awarding benefits to discharged employee. The Supreme Court‚ Sosa‚ J.‚ held that employee’s insubordination‚ improper attire‚ name calling and other conduct evidencing wilful
Premium Employment Unemployment Supreme Court of the United States