organization. Nike Company It is a publicly traded supplier of sportswear and equipment in the United States. The company headquarters are based in Beaverton. Nike is the world’s greatest manufacture and supplier of athletic shoes. The Company adopts a hybrid of both functional and divisional structure. The chief executive officer is in the top of the hierarchy and the following managers directly report to him: the corporate vice president‚ manager operations‚ manager Jordan brand‚ manager Nike brand‚
Premium Management Organizational structure Corporate governance
Founded in 1994‚ Nike Football has grown immensely to become one of the two market leaders in football apparel and footwear. Recognizing the vast opportunities the 2010 World Cup offers for their growth and differentiation from the competitors‚ they are considering a shift in their marketing strategy. Nike’s brand image is of an innovative company‚ focusing on the high performance of their products‚ while simultaneously offering extraordinary designs by partnering with many top-level footballers
Premium American football
Content Nike Strategic Audit Page 2 Appendix A IFAS‚EFAS‚SFAS Page 10 Appendix B Nike Porter ’s Five Page 11 Appendix C Nike Financial Data Page 14 References Page 19 I- Current Situation A. Current Performance Robust financial position‚ $ 15 billion net Profit (See appendix B). Market share around 47%. 28‚000 employee B. Strategic posture 1. Mission To bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the world. 2. Objectives Provide an environment
Premium Athletic shoe Board of directors
Alcoa Inc. For the quarter ended 30th September 2015‚ Alcoa Inc. reported revenue of $ 5.6 billion which was 11 % below that reported for the same period last year. The main reason behind this decline in revenue was the divestiture and closure of low margin business and the dent that aluminium price have continued to take in the most recently ended quarter. The net income was $ 44 million down from $ 149 million of third quarter 2014. Adjusted net income was $ 109 million translating into an EPS
Premium Ford Motor Company Free cash flow Cash flow
we used market value based on the share price of Nike on July 5‚ 2001and number of shares outstanding‚ which resulted in the weights of debt and equity of 10.2% and 89.8% respectively (see Exhibit 2). Cost of Debt: Cost of debt was calculated by Ms. Cohen by finding the historical interest rate of 2.7% and tax rate of 38%. We agree with her estimation of the tax rate of 38%‚ but calculated a cost of debt of 7.17% based on the market price of Nike bonds and finding their yield to maturity (see Exhibit
Premium Stock Weighted average cost of capital Financial markets
About Nike Case 6.1: How to Make Money (D) – Near Automatic Phil Knight and Bill Bowerman started their company with a vision of serving the athlete. That vision was shared by their first employees‚ who were committed to the company but who needed more detailed directions: They needed to know what was appropriate and what wasn’t when it came to conducting company activities. Knight responded by issuing a list of guiding principles at a crucial time in the company’s history. It was 1977‚ and the
Premium Bill Bowerman Nike, Inc. Adidas
.. 1 2.1 2.2 Human Resource Background ..................................................................................... 3 Human Resources Management .................................................................................. 5 HRM of Nike Inc. & Subsidiaries........................................................................ 5 2.2.1 2.2.1.1 Human resources management and the environment ....................................... 6 2.2.1.2 Acquiring human resources ............
Premium Human resource management Human resources Management
Introduction - Nike Nike is the company with one of the most recognised logos in the world – the “swoosh” logo. They are the worlds’ largest sports and fitness company and are a leader in sports equipment research and development earning an estimated US$14 billion in revenue. Nike anticipates the needs of the consumer and this innovation is what sets them apart from its competition. They have a desire to design products which will give definite technological benefits whilst enhancing an athletes’
Premium Pricing Marketing Product management
Individual Assignment - ENMN 430 Erkens Gjini Legal Case Brief Jacobson vs. Nike Canada Inc.‚ Instructor: Connie Carter November 9th‚ 2014 Introduction In the case of Jacobsen vs. Nike Canada Ltd‚ Mr. Jacobsen an employer of Nike Canada Ltd was seriously injured in a car accident as a result of alcohol consumption while at work. This paper will prove that the defendant (Nike Canada Ltd.) was negligent in all the four elements of “Negligence “ and therefore liable for the
Premium Tort Negligence Law
Nike: Spreading Out to Stay Together | By: Karol Czajkowski | Case 10 | 5/2/2013 5/2/2013 REVIEW QUESTIONS 1. If a sporting good can be used in sporting event‚ and especially if that event can be televised‚ Nike has likely made such a product and added a swoosh to it. But in this day and age‚ are there anymore sporting products that Nike would do better not to produce? Explain your reasoning. In the present day there are some products that Nike would not have
Premium Baseball Nike, Inc. Management