555 P.2d 696 Supreme Court of New Mexico. Zelma M. MITCHELL‚ Plaintiff-Appellee‚ v. LOVINGTON GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER‚ INC.‚ Defendant-Appellant. No. 10847.Oct. 27‚ 1976. Appeal was taken from an order of the District Court‚ Bernalillo County‚ Richard B. Traub‚ D.J.‚ reversing a decision of the Unemployment Security Commission and awarding benefits to discharged employee. The Supreme Court‚ Sosa‚ J.‚ held that employee’s insubordination‚ improper attire‚ name calling and other conduct evidencing wilful
Premium Employment Unemployment Supreme Court of the United States
Legal System Identification Adebimpe Koyi Cassandra Chambers Greg Martinez Kenya McDonald University of Phoenix Interoffice Memorandum To: Supervisor From: Legal Team (Chambers A‚ Koyi A‚ Marinez G‚ and McDonald K) Subject: Mr. Al Jones’ utility easement legal situation Date: August 18‚ 2008 Statement of Facts Our client Mr. Al Jones‚ a land developer has been threatened to be sued for fraud against a municipality by the city he was building his newest and
Premium Jury Law Court
LEGAL MEMORANDUM To: John Doe‚ Esquire‚ Senior Partner From: Jennifer Ramos‚ Paralegal Date: July 23‚ 2014 Re: Anheuser Busch Companies‚ Inc.- Affirmative Defense Case No.: 210204 In regards to our case no. 210204 Justin King v. Anheuser Busch Companies‚ Inc. I find Contributory Negligence to be the appropriate Affirmative Defensive action. Mr. King exacerbated his injury when he took it upon himself to loosen the wires‚ to his own admittance. Justin King was also
Premium Law
CadMex Pharmaceutical Memorandum To: Mr. Jack Brandt‚ CEO; Kera Sawyer‚ International Legal Counsel From: Dan‚ Vice President of International Business Development Date: March 9‚ 20XX Subject: Current Gentura Status I would like to take this opportunity to bring everyone up to date on the status of our relationship with Gentura. We have been working in partnership with Gentura a biotechnology company based in Candore since 2007. Candore‚ a small developing island country in South East Asia‚
Premium Law Contract Vice President of the United States
COBRA is to provide a platform for the dissemination of original research and new developments within the specific disciplines‚ sub-disciplines or field of study of: Management of the construction process Cost and value management Building technology Legal aspects of construction and procurement Public private partnerships Health and safety Procurement Risk management Project management The built asset Property investment theory and practice Indirect property investment Property market forecasting Property
Premium Minority group
Fall 2011 SUGGESTIONS FOR STUDYING THE DFPS MEMORANDUM Remember to read and study all of it.This is only a guide to help you think through as you study. 1.The Memo give two reasons why the Gates case is important. A)affects weather u can transport or enter a home B) if the case falls through the staff who removed the child can be sued 2.Look at the definition of Exigent Circumstances A)is reasonable cause to believe the child is an immediate danger 3.Look at the definition of Imminent
Premium Child abuse Appeal
Real property conservatory system is a set of procedures and laws that regulates the ownership of each citizen as a farm‚ a land‚ or a house. This system is a French one brought after 1913 (Dahir‚ 12th august 1913). Before this system‚ the land properties were different types. First‚ “Melkia” which is a document that makes a person a landlord by law signed by the “Adoul” and is under Islamic rules “Shariaa”. Second‚ lands of “Guiche” that were and still given by the sultans or kings to the soldiers
Premium Property Ownership
ILAC Answer: ISSUE: Is the Timberlakes own the negligent for duty of care? Should the Timberlakes put public authorities? Should the Timberlakes take occupier’s liabilities? Is there a loss making event for Lindsey Loharn? Law: Law of Tort—The tort of negligence—Duty of care/ public authorities/ occupier’s liabilities. Duty of care: SWAIN v WAVERLEY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL (2005) public authorities: Nagle v Rottnest Island Authority (1993) occupier’s liabilities: Australian Safeway
Premium Tort Law Negligence
First off Company X would bring the lawsuit to a State Trial Court of General Jurisdiction. These courts hold a wide variety of cases such as civil disputes and criminal prosecution. Although if Company X is planning on suing for less than 5‚000 dollars they may bring the case to a Small Claims Court. Secondly‚ necessary pleadings need to be filed in order for this case to be brought to court. First off Company X would have to file a Plaintiff’s Complaint with the appropriate court. This complaint
Premium Appeal Court Appellate court
United States V McClatchey 217 F3d 823 Cir.‚ (10th ‚ 2000) I. Background This case of U.S government versus defendant McClatchey involves hospital CEO‚ two physicians‚ and Mr. McClatchy who is a part of the administrative staff at Baptist Medical center. Two physicians involved in the case worked together in a group practice called BVMG that provided care to the nursing homes. In 1984‚ they brought a proposal to the Baptist Medical Center to have them buy the practice and in return physicians
Premium Jury Physician