such as Mass EMS scandals regarding recertification. Economic triage is making patient decisions based on economic rather than the patient’s best interest. An individual EMT‚ even when certified or licensed‚ may not provide professional care. A legal agreement with a physician allows the EMT to perform medical assessment‚ care and transport but not as an individual. The agreement dictates that the EMT follows approved directions and protocols. Actions beyond or short of those instructions indicate
Premium Patient Ethics Tort law
BOOK ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS REGARDING THE DATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE‚ AND REGARDING THE OFFENSES‚ THE PERSONS LIABLE AND THE PENALTIES Preliminary Title DATE OF EFFECTIVENESS AND APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE Article 1. Time when Act takes effect. — This Code shall take effect on the first day of January‚ nineteen hundred and thirty-two. Art. 2. Application of its provisions. — Except as provided in the treaties and
Premium Criminal law Crime Legal terms
whether an officer acted lawfully in the line of duty. Procedures related to employee actions can also be subject to legal scrutiny in some cases. A lack of policies on issues involving the community may result in unlawful and inconsistent police action. These adverse actions can create a negative reaction within the community‚ and open the police officers within the department to legal liability. Michael Lyman quoted Section 1983‚ “Every person under color of any statute‚ ordinance‚ regulation‚ custom
Premium Law Police Legal terms
the debt as against the other. As under section 38 of the Contract Act‚ ‘An offer to one of several joint promisees has the same legal consequences as an offer to all of them. In the first part of the section it is provided that where an offer of performance has been made and not accepted‚ the promisor is not responsible for non-performance. Follows that when a legal tender has been made to one of two joint promisees and refused by him‚ the promisor is discharged from liability in respect of his
Premium Common law Debt Defendant
defined in ‘the Agreement’‚ served the notice to the plaintiff regarding payment of money dated 12th of February‚ 2013. When the Defendant approached the plaintiff‚ with the ‘Fard’‚ on the closing date‚ the Plaintiff refused to pay. Thereafter‚ another legal notice was served‚ by the Law-14 Associates on behalf of the defendant‚ to the Plaintiffs dated 27th of
Premium Plaintiff Civil procedure Pleading
(Cheeseman2013) In the case of Cunningham v. Hastings‚ Mr. Hastings and Mrs. Cunningham‚ was an unmarried couple‚ purchased a home together. Mr. Hastings put $45‚000 down payment toward the home out of his pocket. When it came to how the deed established the deed stated Hastings Cunningham as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. The couple occupied the property jointly. When the relationship between the two ended‚ Mr. Hastings seized sole possession of the property. Mrs. Cunningham filed
Premium Law Legal terms United States
DATA ACCESS (INDIA) LIMITED (N RANGACHARI) V/S BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED Date of Decision: 19 April 2007 Negotiable Instruments Act‚ 1881 - Offences by Companies - Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency‚ etc.‚ of funds in the account - Cognizance of offences Acts Referred: Code of Criminal Procedure‚ 1973 Sec 482 Companies Act‚ 1956 Sec 291 Negotiable Instruments Act‚ 1881 Sec 141‚ Sec 141(2)‚ Sec 138‚ Sec 142 [3] On behalf of the Data Access (India) Limited‚ two cheques were issued to the
Premium Cheque Legal terms
usually referred to in this connection is respondeat superior‚ i.e.‚ the superior must be responsible or let the principal be liable. In such cases not only he who obeys but also he who commands becomes equally liable. This rule has its origin in the legal presumption that all acts done by the servant in and about his master’s business are done by his master’s express or implied authority and are‚ in truth‚ the act of the master. The master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant as is committed
Premium Tort law Legal terms
duty to not to increase the inherent risk of the game. The doctrine of primary assumption of the risk is when the plaintiff has voluntarily and knowingly engaged in an inherently risky activity like sports and the defendant owes the plaintiff no legal duty to protect against those inherent risk that caused his or her
Premium Tort Legal terms Tort law
COMPLAINT U/SEC12 OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT Your Honour‚ That complaint submit as under: We‚ Kalavati w/o Sidramayya Math & Mallikarjun S/o Sidramayya. Math legal heir of Late Sidramayya.B.Math owner of site bearing no 5-1-618 located at Afzalpur For Delibartely‚misguided‚lack of service‚ Of PattanaPanchayat Afazalpur tortured mentally & finally causing the loss of amount
Premium Consumer protection Legal terms Defendant