Tenezas Continuation of facts The respondents admitted that tenezas and endraca were employees the former being a regular driver and the latter being the spare driver but denied the employment of Francisco Tenezas not terminated-overhaul but did not report to work Endraca stopped reporting to work and therefore cannot be terminated LA- Francisco failed to present sufficient evidence to prove regulat employment such as company ID‚ SSS mem and not considered as an employee. Ten and End could not
Premium Legal terms Employment Security
Reporter: Glemar S. Monsales Basic Guideline for Public School Administrators to Understanding the Application of the DepEd Rules of Procedure Disciplining Authority of Non-teaching Personnel (Sec 6) School Superintendents (provision by virtue of RA 9155) Grounds for Disciplinary Action Sec. 2 of the Rules Content of the Complaint (Sec. 5) a. ) full name(s) and address(es) of the complainant b. ) full name(s) and address(es) of the person complained of as well as position and office of employment
Premium Law Appeal Court
Pre-paid Legal Services’ Business Prepaid creates value by providing legal expense insurance allowing customers to reduce their legal liability in civil or criminal actions. Their bestselling Family Plan that provides reimbursement for legal expenses incurred by customers and their spouses and discounted rates for legal services over those provided in contract. Furthermore‚ they allow their own customers to earn their own income by MLM programme where they receive commission for selling Prepaid’s
Premium Income Sales Income statement
Workmen Of Dimakuchi Tea Estate V. The Management Of Dimakuchi Tea Estate ... on 4 February‚ 1958 CITATION: 1958 AIR 353 1958 SCR 1156 WORKMEN OF DIMAKUCHI TEA ESTATE……. PETITIONER: Vs. THE MANAGEMENT OF DIMAKUCHITEA ESTATE……. RESPONDENT: DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/02/1958 BENCH: DAS‚ SUDHI RANJAN (CJ)‚ DAS‚ S.K.‚ SARKAR‚ A.K. FACTS OF THE CASE Dr. K. P. Banerjee was appointed assistant medical officer of the Dimakuchi tea estate subject to a satisfactory medical report and on probation for three
Premium Appellate court Appeal Court
the Drinking Age The U.S. has the drinking problem. The young people‚ especially the college students‚ drink in excessive ways that have dangerous and damaging effect. Many people say the best way for combat this problem is to keep the Minimum Legal Drinking Age‚ or the MLDA‚ for 21 years and older adults. They argue the worst thing is to encourage more young people to drink alcohol because this will cause more risky behavior and even more deaths‚ as from traffic fatalities. Of course‚ it is
Premium Drinking culture United States National Minimum Drinking Age Act
was a senior student of the University of the Philippines-Cebu. A student of a state university is known as a government scholar. She was appointed by then President Joseph Estrada on December 21‚ 1999 as a student regent of UP‚ to serve a one-year term starting January 1‚ 2000 and ending on December 31‚ 2000. In the early part of 2000‚ petitioner discussed with President Estrada the renovation of Vinzons Hall Annex in UP Diliman.2 On September 4‚ 2000‚ petitioner‚ with her siblings and relatives
Premium Joseph Estrada Jurisdiction Criminal law
Silence does not amount to misrepresentation‚ how if‚ it is to a known defects? Discuss by using case law to support your answer. Misrepresentation is defined as a false statement of existing facts or laws‚ which materially induces the misled party to enter into the contract. This is a pre-contractual statement‚ which is not part of the contract. However‚ these non-contractual statements can be classified as mere puffs (sales talk) or misrepresentations. For a misrepresentation to be actionable
Premium Complaint Legal terms Misrepresentation
IN AND FOR FORD COUNTY‚ ILLINOIS PAXTON MEDICAL CENTER AND ITS DOCTORS‚ SURGEONS AND NURSES Defendant VS. JUSTIN WILLIAM KING Plaintiff ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 7417410 (05) Judge Stephen R. Pacey DEFENDANT ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF COMPLAINT COMES NOW‚ DEFENDANT‚ Paxon Hospital and for their complaint alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff‚ for all times mentioned herein‚ was and is a resident of the
Premium Legal terms Pleading Cause of action
The plaintiff‚ Cynthia Holderfield filed this case on behalf of her sister and legal ward‚ Elise Ann Wasson‚ a disabled adult. The complaint alleges that as a result of the insured’s neglect‚ Elise sustained significant and permanent injuries following a fall on January 17‚ 2016‚ while she was a resident at one of our insured’s Community Integrated Living Arrangement homes. The plaintiff further alleges that the insured neglected Elise when it failed to take the necessary precautions to prevent
Premium Tort Law Tort law
11. Vimal (PW No.01) in her evidence stated that the deceased Ashok Raosaheb Bade was her husband‚ who died due to electric shock. Her evidence shows that the deceased Ashok Raosaheb Bade was working as a labour with respondent no. 01. On 25/11/2009 the deceased Ashok was present in his house. At the relevant time‚ respondent no.01 contacted him through mobile call. Respondent no. 01 through his mobile phone called the deceased Ashok to repaire electrical fault in the vicinity of village Hingni
Premium Autopsy Death Legal terms