The plaintiff‚ Jean Hatter‚ by and through her attorney‚ Nancy McGee‚ for her Complaint against the Defendant alleges the following: 1. Plaintiff is a citizen of North Carolina‚ residing at 123 Shirtsleeve Drive‚ Durham‚ North Carolina‚ 27517. The action occurred in the state of North Carolina‚ county of Durham. 2. Defendant is incorporated to do business in the state of North Carolina‚ with the principal location of business being 456 Food Shop Road‚ Durham‚ North Carolina‚ 27517‚ and the defendant’s
Premium Civil procedure United States Legal terms
Universal Vice: Cramming “Whoops! It ’s the night before the big exam‚ and you haven ’t done a lick of studying all semester. Looking back on it‚ you know that you should have been hitting the books all those nights you were watching television‚ but there ’s nothing you can do about it now. Don ’t throw in the towel yet‚ though--it ’s time to get cramming.” How often do you do this? Most common among high school and college-aged students‚ cramming is often used as a means of memorizing
Premium Time Term University of Cambridge
NATURAL LAW AND LEGAL POSITIVISM This essay is going to discuss and analyse the differences between two basic principles- natural law and legal positivism. According to Hume‚ there are two realms of human enquiry ‚ one in the field of facts which is concerned with what ‘ is ‘ actually the case and the other in the field of ‘ought’ that is‚ what ought to be the case1. Those who believe in the principle of natural law are known as naturalists while those who believe in the principle of legal positivism
Premium Law Natural law
PA Punishment of advocates for misconduct.- Where on receipt of a complaint or otherwise a State Bar Council has reason to believe that any advocate on its roll has been guilty of professional or other misconduct‚ it shall refer the case for disposal to its disciplinary committee In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case‚ in our opinion‚ the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal ought to have recalled the order of dismissal of the claim petition‚ dated 27-1-1998 and restored the petition
Premium Plaintiff Legal terms Prima facie
Complainant is entitled to get Rs. 30‚000/- as compensation and the complainant also entitled to get Rs. 5000/- for irresponsible act of the respondent. 14. That this Hon’ble Forum under the Consumer Protection Act has jurisdiction to try and entertain the present complaint. PRAYER In view of the above submissions‚ it is most respectfully prayed that the Hon’ble Forum may graciously
Premium Legal terms The Honourable Defendant
Final Waiver of Lien and Release of Claim KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: WHEREAS‚ the undersigned has supplied labor and / or materials for the construction of improvements known as: (hereinafter referred to as “Project”)‚ NOW THEREFORE‚ in consideration of One or more dollars and other valuable consideration‚ the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged‚ the undersigned does hereby waive and release any and all liens‚ claims‚ or rights of liens or claims (i) on or against the Project
Premium Contract law Property Act
Amanda June Mr. Hill English AP September 9‚ 2012 Dissent vs. Disagreement Daniel J. Boorstin’s excerpt of distinction between dissent and disagreement is a true statement. A strong dissent between one topic leads to a quarrel‚ whilst‚ disagreeing shows a milder answer that leads to only a simple argument. By examining the outcomes and circumstances in which they are used‚ it becomes clear that disagreement and dissent have different meanings in context. Disagreement occurs when one topic
Premium Controversy Controversies Argument
Consider the criminal liability of the defendant in the situation below and consider the defence of insanity to the offences that you find he has committed. Johnson could be held liable for Section 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861. This is unlawfully inflicting grievous bodily harm or malicious wounding with intent to cause some harm. There must be a break in the continuity of the skin for a D to be held liable for malicious wounding (JCC v Eisenhower). GBH was described as “serious”
Premium Legal terms Crime Reason
G.R. No. L-59298 April 30‚ 1984 FLORENTINA L. BACLAYON‚ petitioner‚ vs. HON. PACITO G. MUTIA‚ as Presiding Judge of the Municipal Court of Plaridel‚ Misamis Occidental and PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES‚ respondents. FACTS OF THE CASE: Municipal Court of Plaridel‚ Misamis Occidental convicted Florentina L. Baclayon a teacher of Plaridel Central School by the crime Serious Oral Defamation to Pacito G. Mutia ‚ principal of the Plaridel Central School‚ taking into account the aggravating circumstance
Premium Legal terms Teacher Lawyer
ANGE CAROLINE………………………………………………..COMPLAINANT OTTO JOHN………………………..………………………………RESPONDENT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING The complainant cohabited with the respondent for six years. This resulted into one issue; AYELLA NORBERT (13 Years).The complainant confirmed that they have been living happily. Last year in February‚ her parents picked her from her place and took her to stay with them so that the respondent settles other obligations as required culturally .And the respondent
Premium Defendant Legal terms Health care