Title of issue: ‘Observation of Civil Proceedings’ Name (Student): Arjun Singh Course: BBA.LLB P.R.N. No.: 10010224062 Batch: 2010-15 Name of the Court: DISTRICT & SESSION COURT HISAR Date of Observation: 24/02/2015 Case No. I: CS/183/2015 Title of the Case: KALU SINGH v. RAHUL Stage of the case: Prelimnary Hearing Appearance made by the parties: Sh. Ram Chandar Kakkar the ld. Defendant counsel appeared for the defendant i.e. Sh. Rahul. The plaintiff didn’t appear. Proceedings
Premium Legal terms Civil procedure
Plaintiff AmeriPride services‚ Inc (“Plaintiffs”) initiated action pursuant to CERCLA more than sixteen years ago to recover investigation and remediation costs of about $7.75 million it incurred after a perchloroethelyne (“PCE”) contamination caused by previous owners Valley Industrial Services‚ Inc. (“VIS”) an industrial dry cleaning and laundry business using PCE as a solvent. VIS would eventually merge into Texas Eastern Overseas‚ Inc (“TEO”). After trial‚ appeal‚ and settlement with other parties
Premium Law Civil procedure Legal terms
Alan’s offence: Involuntary manslaughter - involuntary manslaughter is when a person commits an unlawful killing of a human being without intending to kill‚ involuntary manslaughter is often caused by recklessness or criminal negligence as you can see in this scenario Adam admits the only thing he wanted to do was to frighten off Pete he had no intent to kill anyone (Regina -v- Meeking [2012] EWCA Crim 641) In this case the appellant was convicted of involuntary manslaughter of her husband on the
Premium Criminal law Law Causality
Yes people should be hold responsible for a life or death situation. Say if someone killed another human being or a living organism you would be hold accountable for their action. But it depends on what they did. They should be responsible for a life or death situation but it depends on what they did or did not do.“I am getting out there! I yelled to k... I was sure l had yelled loud enough but my voice did not seem to have reached (Murakami 139)”. In this case he is not responsible for his friend
Premium English-language films Morality Thought
Lakeman v Mountstephen (1874) LR 7 HL 17‚ 43 LJQB 188‚ 22 WR 617‚ 30 LT 437‚ [1874-80] All ER Rep Ext 1924 Court: pre-SCJA 1873 Judgment Date: circa 1874 Case History Annotations Case Name Citations Court Date Signal - Lakeman v Mountstephen (1874) LR 7 HL 17‚ 43 LJQB 188‚ 22 WR 617‚ 30 LT 437‚ [1874-80] All ER Rep Ext 1924 pre-SC JA 1873 circa 1874 Affirming Mountstephen v Lakeman (1871) LR 7 QB 196‚ 36 JP 261‚ 41 LJQB 67‚ 20 WR 117‚ 25 LT 755 Ex Ch circa 1871 Cases referring
Premium Contract Legal terms Debt
Lucio Morigo vs People Facts: Lucio Morigo and Lucia Barrete were then boardmates for a lengthy period of time until they part ways and lost contact. After many years‚ Lucio was surprised to receive a card from Lucia‚ all the way from Singapore. They maintained constant communication and became sweethearts. They married each other at Iglesia de Filipina Nacional at Bohol by merely signing a marriage contract by themselves and without solemnization. Thereafter‚ Lucia went back to Canada
Premium Marriage Legal terms Contract
Matthew Smith Agency Relationship Agency relationship is a consensual relationship between two parties‚ where one party‚ the principal‚ gives authority to another party‚ the agent‚ to act on behalf of and under the control of the principal to deal with a third party‚ thereby creating a fiduciary relationship. The law of agency allows one person to employ another to do his/her work‚ sell his/her goods‚ and acquire property on his/her own behalf. Although a principal-agent relationship can be
Premium Tort law Agency Vicarious liability
THE MAURITIUS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS (OFFICERS’ POWERS AND PROTECTION) (AMENDMENT) BILL (No. XLVII of 2003) Explanatory Memorandum The object of this Bill is to provide for an efficient system of registration of dogs and to enable registered dogs to be identified by means of an electronic tag or a tattoo. P. K. Jugnauth 31 October 2003 Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance and Minister of Agriculture‚ Food Technology
Premium Dog Legal terms Dogs
Case Name: Rylands v Fletcher [1868] UKHL 1 Court: House of Lords Case History: Exchequer of Pleas Court of Exchequer Chamber Facts: The defendant owned a mill and constructed a reservoir on their land. The reservoir was placed over a disused mine. Water from the reservoir filtered through to the disused mine shafts and then spread to a working mine owned by the claimant causing extensive damage. Held (Court of Exchequer): The trial court found that the defendant was
Premium Defendant Plaintiff Legal terms
FORMATION OF AGENCY QUESTION 2 Introduction Agency define which subsists between principal and an agent‚ where the agent has been authorized to act for the principal or represent him in dealing with others or 3rd party. Agent is person who is employed by the principal to do certain act for him to represent him in dealings with 3rd party. Principal is a person who authorizes the agent to act on behalf of him. There are five formation of agency‚ which is by express appointment‚ by implied appointment
Premium Partnership Contract Defendant