the contract. Legal Issues The legal issue presented by Robert Briggs is an action to void an oral real estate contract because it violates the Statute of Frauds. While‚ the Statute of Frauds does indeed require real estate contracts to be in writing in order to be enforceable‚ the Statute of Frauds does not apply to Briggs v. Sackett as the specifics of this case warrant an exception from the Statue of Frauds under the equitable doctrine of part performance. Applicable Laws The equitable doctrine
Premium Contract Contract law
Question 1 The issue of this question is whether Scott and Kyle can bring legal action against Wayne for what they feel is a breach of contract. Under the law governing offer and acceptance‚ a valid offer has been made through an advertisement. In order for an offer to be accepted‚ the party must entirely accept the offer. The rules governing acceptance has to be positive not passive. Silence does not forms acceptance. The general rule of acceptance is that the acceptance must be received by
Premium Offer and acceptance Contract Option contract
Unjust-contract. d. Unilateral-contract. A [easy p. 197] 57. Which of the following are two terms for concept or situation? a. Implied-in-law contract and implied-in-fact contract. b. Implied-in-law contract and quasi-contract. c. Implied-in-fact contract and quasi-contract. d. Unilateral contract and informal contract. e. Formal contract and implied-in-law contract. B [moderate p. 197] 58. Which of the following is needed to impose a quasi-contract? a. A benefit having been conferred and injustice
Premium Contract
LAW TUTORIAL QUESTIONS Tutorial 1 1. Explain: (a) international law (b) legal rights (c) legal duty (d) public international law (e) private international law 2. Explain the differences between civil law system and common law system 3. Explain: (a) Convention (exam) (b) Treaties (exam) (c) International Organization (d) State (e) Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) (f) MNE & TNC (g)International Person 4.What governs the relationship in International Trade? Tutorial
Premium Common law Contract Law
create legal relations. Therefore‚ the plaintiff cannot get the money. Similarly‚ in the study case‚ Anthony is equal to the plaintiff‚ and his wife is equal to the defendant. The defendants both give the “letter of comfort” or promise‚ but refused to carry out it. The different point is case did not have the intention to create a legal relations‚ but Anthony’s case did. Therefore‚ the previous one is not binding‚ but the latter one is binding. The second condition is about the family law‚ there
Premium Marriage Case study Consideration
conditional constitute consideration? Yes‚ such a promise consideration even if the condition is unlikely to occur. 3. What is the general rule about the adequacy of consideration? The adequacy of the consideration is irrelevant because the law does not prohibit bargains. 5. Is there consideration when a secured note for a lesser amount is given and accepted in discharge of an unsecured note for a greater amount? Explain. No‚ because if a secured not for a lesser amount is given and
Premium Contract Contract law Law
What is a contract? A contract is an agreement enforceable by law. 2. What is an agreement? An agreement is an arrangement between parties that creates legal obligations between them. Generally an agreement is said to be arrived at when an offer or proposal made by one person is accepted by another‚ with the intention of creating mutual obligations between them. 5. What are the essential features of a contract? Minimum two parties :- Atleast two parties are needed to enter into a contact
Premium Contract Contract law
make a legal offer because it refused to give the car as prize & also neglected to remove the car & the sign before Cobaugh’s play in the tournament. 04. 05. 06. No‚ Madaio did not effectively accept the offer before McCarthy withdrew it. Because Madaio signed the contract but did not mailed or informed McCarthy before withdrawal. 07. 08. No‚ because the purchase price & the closing price . ” & Jessee charged 25 percent. Though he informed Smith but it cannot be enforceable by law. 09. Yes
Premium Contract Contract law
acceptance * ‘Capacity or the ability to understand the consequences of a contract by persons of such age prescribed by law & those with sound mind. * ‘Mutual consent’ or agreement on the terms of a contract ‘consideration’‚ or reward for goods or services rendered. The element that distinguishes a contract from casual agreements is that it is legally binding: The law provides a remedy in the event that the promise is broken. Legally‚ certain types of contracts should be in writing‚
Premium Contract
regulation in Saudi that has specific implication when settling disputes. It is forbidden in Islamic law by Qur’an when the operation concerned is risky and could result in deceit of one of the parties (http://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gharar.asp). In this case‚ the U.S could claim that the reparation cost of breaching the contract could be classified as Gharar as it is specific to Islamic law: Saudi being an Islamic country with applicable jurisdiction‚ the US could claim gharar as the cost of
Premium Contract