JOURNAL OF FINANCE • VOL. LIII‚ NO. 4 • AUGUST 1998 Agency Costs‚ Risk Management‚ and Capital Structure HAYNE E. LELAND* ABSTRACT The joint determination of capital structure and investment risk is examined. Optimal capital structure ref lects both the tax advantages of debt less default costs ~Modigliani and Miller ~1958‚ 1963!!‚ and the agency costs resulting from asset substitution ~Jensen and Meckling ~1976!!. Agency costs restrict leverage and debt maturity and increase yield spreads
Premium Capital structure Corporate finance Debt
CHAPTER 6 MASTER BUDGET AND RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING 6-16 (15 min.) Sales budget‚ service setting. 1. |McGrath & Sons |2009 Volume |At 2009 |Expected 2010 |Expected 2010 Volume | | | |Selling Prices |Change in Volume | | |Radon Tests |11‚000 |$250 |+5% |11‚550
Premium Budget Inventory Variable cost
Sales ($68 per unit × 410‚000 units) $27‚880‚000 Variable costs ($60 per unit × 410‚000 units) 24‚600‚000 Contribution margin $ 3‚280‚000 1b. Contribution margin (from above) $3‚280‚000 Fixed costs 1‚640‚000 Operating income $1‚640‚000 2a. Sales (from above) $27‚880‚000 Variable costs ($54 per unit × 410‚000 units) 22‚140‚000 Contribution margin $ 5‚740‚000 2b. Contribution margin $5‚740‚000 Fixed costs 5‚330‚000 Operating income $ 410‚000 3 Operating
Premium Variable cost Contribution margin Costs
Lex Speciali Derogat Legi Generali is a law principle meaning that the special regulations will override the general rule. This principle was made so that the special case will be regulated by the certain or specialized law too. The principle of Lex Speciali Derogat Legi Generali used because some cases need to have their own law because sometimes the general law can’t always regulate the specific cases.The other reason in using this principle is to avoiding the clash between the laws‚ for example
Premium Law Constitution Constitutionality
provide the Common Law determination of the Lex Domicilii Matimonii and its potential constitutional problems. Thereafter‚ the different proposals for determining the marriage domicile will be addressed with regards to several academic authors. The judgment of Sadiku v Sadiku will then be considered focusing on immovable property. Finally‚ this discussion will conclude with a synopsis of the Lenferna v Lenferna judgment and its determination of the Lex Domicilii Matrimonii. 2. Common Law determination
Premium Conflict of laws Common law Law
CHAPTER 9 THE COST OF CAPITAL (Difficulty: E = Easy‚ M = Medium‚ and T = Tough) Multiple Choice: Problems Easy: Cost of common stock Answer: d Diff: E [i]. Bouchard Company ’s stock sells for $20 per share‚ its last dividend (D0) was $1.00‚ and its growth rate is a constant 6 percent. What is its cost of common stock‚ rs? a. 5.0% b. 5.3% c. 11.0% d. 11.3% e. 11.6% Cost of common stock Answer: b Diff: E [ii]. Your company ’s stock
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Stock market Stock
HBR.ORG Do You Know Your Cost of Capital? Probably not‚ if your company is like most by Michael T. Jacobs and Anil Shivdasani July–AuGust 2012 reprinT r1207L For arTicLe reprinTs caLL 800-988-0886 or 617-783-7500‚ or visiT hbr.org Do You Know Your Cost Of Capital? probably not‚ if your company is like most by Michael T. Jacobs and Anil Shivdasani W With trillions of dollars in cash sitting on their balance sheets‚ corporations have never had so much money. How executives
Premium Investment Net present value Finance
Financial Decision Analysis~Marriott Corporation Case Study Executive Summary – Q5 – Hurdle Rate Analysis Hurdle rates‚ the weighted cost of capital that projected cash flows must exceed for initiatives to be considered‚ vary within Marriott Corporations due to their unique industry risk levels and capital structures. They use this number to determine which projects to accept‚ to adjust the rate at which the firm grows and as a measure for compensation within each business area‚ and as incentive
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Finance
ACT 510 November 19‚ 2013 Do You Know Your Cost of Capital? Investing capital dollars drives the corporate strategy to newer heights in this age‚ where the business is dependent upon making sound decisions that financially intertwine for further growth and development. Within any financial team‚ analyses should be conducted uniformly across the board‚ arriving at a conducive return on investments to solidify the reasoning behind completing the future project. As Jacobs & Shivdasani point
Premium Investment Capital Economics
case “Marriott Corporation: The cost of capital” 1) Are the four components of Marriott’s financial strategy consistent with its growth objective? In my opinion‚ the four components of Marriott’s financial strategy are consistent with its growth objective. As we find in the case‚ the four components of Marriott’s financial strategy: Manage rather than own hotel assets‚ Invest in projects that increase shareholder value‚ Optimize the use of debt in the capital structure‚ and Repurchase undervalued
Premium Marketing Hotel Hotels