It is my belief that the essay “The Case for Torture” is flawed and that Torture is impermissible whatever the case. This is as torture is fundamentally immoral. The text states that the perpetrator aims to obtain valuable information which could potentially save thousands of lives‚ and what is the damage or loss of one life compared to this? However‚ torture achieves this goal through inflicting excruciating pain to the powerless victim‚ which cannot ever be justified. All religions take this
Premium Torture Human rights Morality
In this essay I will present an argument to show that Kantian Deontology is not a plausible moral theory because the two fundamental principles from Kant’s Categorical Imperatives are unable to account for the permissibility of certain acts that would otherwise be considered immoral. This would discredit the usefulness of Kant’s theory as a moral guideline because individuals would then be able to commit acts - those of which would be considered immoral according to considered moral judgements -
Premium Immanuel Kant Ethics Morality
In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics‚ the idea of people finding happiness‚ which is the ultimate end and purpose of human existence‚ depends on having a moral character. The possibility of people being able to do the right thing would be more clear in situations where people’s lives may be on the line. Aristotle repeatedly reminds us that in ethics‚ there are no universal/absolute rules or laws in place that dictate how people should specifically act under specific conditions. Everything has the potential
Premium Ethics Nicomachean Ethics Plato
Active Euthenasia From A Kantian Perspective Euthanasia is one of society’s more widely debated moral issues of our time. Active euthanasia is; "Doing something‚ such as administering a lethal drug‚ or using other ways that will cause a person’s death." In the other hand‚ Passive euthanasia is; "Stopping (or not starting) a treatment‚ that will make a person die‚ the condition of the person will cause his or her death." It seems that this one is not to debate‚ as much as the other one (active)
Premium
Utilitarianism‚ Kantian Ethics‚ Natural Rights Theories‚ and Religious Ethics A “utilitarian” argument‚ in the strict sense‚ is one what alleges that we ought to do something because it will produce more total happiness than doing anything else would. Act utilitarianism (AU) is the moral theory that holds that the morally right action‚ the act that we have a moral duty to do‚ is the one that will (probably) maximize “utility” (happiness‚ welfare‚ well-being). AU is not to be confused with egoism
Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant Human rights
In this paper I will examine the practicality and applicability of Kantian moral law in comparison to the golden rule. The main focus will be with on categorical imperatives‚ hypothetical imperatives‚ duty‚ and good will when it comes to Kantian moral law. Then‚ with the golden rule the focus will be on the whole maxim‚ “do unto others as you would have them do unto you”‚ since it is quite simple. To help with the analysis of these two topics the examples of the death penalty and charity will be
Premium
BSB111 – Business Law and Ethics Semester 1 2010 ETHICS CASE STUDY QBank offered Jen a substantial amount of money for the premises of her florist shop. However‚ this will all come at the cost of her two employees Diane and Helen losing their jobs in the shop. Therefore‚ it seems Jen faces an ethical dilemma‚ particularly because she promised her employees that she would keep them on. By looking at key relevant ethical theories a decision can be made that best suits Jens situation. Egoism
Premium Ethics Virtue ethics Virtue
goodness or badness of something” (Merriam-Webster‚ n.d.). Describing morality is rather simple‚ but what’s left to question is what determines the rightness or goodness of a thing or action. Using two ethical theories‚ Social Construct Theory and Kantian Theory I propose the answer to this question; the morality of an action is determined by agreements and the “categorical imperative”. Social Contract Theory is based on the idea that actions are morally right if they are made under an agreement. This
Premium Morality Ethics Virtue
strengths and weaknesses. The Kantian theory is one which emphasizes on suppressing personal inclinations and performing one’s duty unless one is either not a free agent or has no duty‚ even proposing several formulations to determine one’s duty‚ allowing it to solve problems other theories face. Unlike other moral guides‚ it takes motives into account when judging one’s morality. The Golden Rule‚ also known as the ethic of reciprocity‚ is a general principle of ethics which requires one to treat
Premium
Lifeboat Earth Essay What is a common good? A common good is a social goal so to say‚ it is when the people of the society strive to do better than how they are doing now and they are served as examples of good ideals and values‚ and their rewards serve as incentives to the rest of the society to mimic them‚ which is what contributes to the common good. An example to this is college. In college‚ the people who work hard and get good grades get rewarded with higher scholarships and are recognized
Premium Ethics Goods Religion