of a company. And the common law has extended the scope of “promoter” further in Tracy v Mandalay Pty Ltd (1953) 88 CLR 215. In this case‚ the High Court held that the promoters are not just these persons who take an active part in the formation process‚ but also these who profits from the operation of the company with a passive role. Applying this doctrine to the case study‚ Alicia can be regarded as one of the promoters of Batco Ltd‚ since she had involved in the formation of the company and
Premium Fiduciary Stock market Civil procedure
cancelled only by special resolution of the company and: (c) by special resolution passed at a meeting: (i) for a company with a share capital of the class of members holding shares in the class… (d) with the written consent of members with at least 75% of the votes in the class.” (Tony & Christopher 2009) It would seem that the Company has the special resolution about the preference shares’ rights. By reliance on the assumption in s246B (2)‚ the Company will cannot increase the dividend rate for
Premium Stock market Stock Shareholder
Why are modern Muslim women adopting the veil‚ hijab or turban even when their mothers did not wear it? How does veiling shape the identity of these Muslim women? Is such voluntary modern veiling necessarily more oppressive than the pressure Western women are under to always dress up‚ look good‚ feminine and desirable as they walk out of their front doors? Discuss with reference to literature on Muslim women in Western minority situations and/or in predominantly Muslim countries. Refer to essential
Premium Islam Feminism Western world
of television and radio appearances and his name and pictures was used by the company. Subsequently‚ John heard nothing from the Superfast Ltd. Last week‚ he decided to travel to a football game in Liverpool and he contacted Superfast Ltd to arrange his free travel. The company informed him that the ‘free travel for life’was simply a prize that had been made available to him and as he had provided nothing to the company in return so there would be no free travel made available to him. The case
Premium Contract
COURSE: LAW2464 COMPANY LAW DATE: 17/03/2012 TIME ALLOWED: 1 hour 40 minutes (including 10mins reading time) QUESTION (Prospectus Topic) In July 2011‚ Ah Beng was at his accountant’s office to talk about taxation matters. Whilst there‚ his accountant gave him a prospectus issued by Ionic Ltd.‚ a company listed on the Singapore Stock Exchange‚ to take home to read and if interested‚ to follow the instructions about investing in new shares in the company which were to be quoted
Premium Stock Contract Stock market
the low administration requirements compare to form a company. Disadvantages The first major disadvantage is for partnership there are unlimited liability for Andy and Zara. The second major disadvantage is there is no separation between Andy and Zara to manage and control the business. ii) Advantages: The first major advantage is the company has limited liability for shareholders. The second major advantage is the share of the company allow for transfer and expansion. Disadvantages: The
Premium Stock Corporation
CHILOMBA v THE PEOPLE (1974) Z.R. 151 (S.C.) SUPREME COURT DOYLE‚ C.J.‚ BARON‚ D.C.J.‚ AND HUGHES‚ J.S. 9TH JULY‚ 1974 S.C.Z. JUDGMENT NO. 26 OF 1974. Flynote Criminal Law - Attempting to cause death contrary to s. 215 of the Penal Code - No unequivocal finding of actual intention to kill - Whether conviction possible. Criminal Procedure - Minor offence -Section 181 of the Criminal Procedure Code- Whether s. 224 of the Penal Code minor offence in relation to s. 215 of the Penal Code
Premium Criminal law Crime
appear to be in the best interests of the company both subjectively and objectively. The statutory remedy for disadvantaged shareholders‚ s 459‚ may provide a remedy for H‚ but the courts have set their face against using the section to provide a remedy for shareholders who object to the board’s bona fide actions if they do not impinge upon the ‘legitimate expectations’ of the shareholder; see‚ for example‚ Re A Company (No 002567 of 1982) (1983)‚ the wine bar case mentioned above‚ and Re Saul
Premium Contract Breach of contract Contract law
Introduction This article will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of sales force automation. Nowadays‚ salesperson in many companies have relied on top performers to keep competitive. That means a successful salesperson should take a special approach. Sales force automation is the system that contain the use of hardware and software to achieve automate the business tasks of sales and its also tie together functions‚ for example‚ sales tracking and expense reports. sales force automation also
Premium Marketing Sales Customer service
Q1. At the beginning‚ in this case‚ we may identify two issues needed to be discussed. The first one is whether Kwan or Lau&Kwan Co. would be liable for the debt incurred by Lau. The second issue is whether Lau&Kwan Co. has established a place of business in Hong Kong. In the light of s.7 of the Partnership Ordinance‚ “acts of every partner‚ who does any act for carrying on in the usual way business of the kind carried on by the firm‚ bind the firm and his partners‚ unless the partner
Premium Corporation