Gross profit‚ Net profit‚ Return on Capital Employed - Is the business able to control its production or overhead costs? 2 Efficiency ratios - How efficiently is the business employing resources invested in fixed assets and working capital? 3 Liquidity ratios: Current‚ quick ratio - How capable is the business in meeting its short-term obligations as they fall due? 4 Stability ratios: eg. Gearing - How healthy is the business in the long-term financially? 5 Investor ratios: EPS‚ Price earning
Premium Financial ratio Financial ratios Asset
Financial Statement Analysis Project--Hershey Corp. & Tootsie Roll Industries Liquidity Based on the ratio analysis performed‚ it appears that the Hershey Company’s liquidity is sufficient to meet cash needs and current obligations. The current ratio and current debt coverage ratios were decreasing from 2002 through 2004‚ which corresponds to an increase in short-term debt and a decrease in cash on the Company’s balance sheet over the same periods. Hershey attributes the increase in debt to
Premium Balance sheet Financial ratio Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
companies that we choose‚ which are Eco World‚ Gamuda Land and IOI properties. For analysis which company is the best to invest‚ we will use five categories of financial analysis to differentiate. There are profitability‚ efficiency‚ shareholder ratio‚ liquidity and the capital structure. Profitability Ratio ECO GAMUDA IOI Profitability Net Profit Margin 5.08% 31.52% 5.51% Return on Assets 1.46% 4.72% 3.68%
Premium Finance Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Investment
Analysis of the financial data for Under Armour Inc. & Nike Inc. 1. Liquidity | Comparison between Nike & Under Armour | | 2010 | 2009 | Current Ratio | •Both companies have a ratio that is higher than the dangerous 1.0 current ratio.•The current Ratio of Under Armour is a bit higher than Nike`s which means that Under Armour is more efficient in terms of the operating cycle or in other words the ability to turn its products into cash. | •Both companies have a ratio that is higher
Premium Financial ratio Marketing Economics
to the Patriot trap‚ the McCool independence trap did not appear to produce a measurable amount of carbon dioxide. It is Mr. Kaltofen’s opinion that this trap remains essentially untested‚ because the test did not provide evidence that this trap was properly functional at the time of testing or at the time of the incident. Mr. Kaltofen bases his opinion in the following facts: The McCool trap was tested using the McCool propane tank‚ and the burn test run for 43 minutes. The trap warmed up at the
Premium Carbon dioxide Oxygen
ingenious booby traps were. The tunnels did allow the Vietcong to continue using their ‘Guerilla Tactics’ effectively‚ and intern “keep the Americans guessing” as to where and when they would be next hit. The tunnels were thought to make up any disadvantages the VC had with weapons against the Americans and although they did not cause physical harm to the soldiers‚ as the booby traps did‚ they were almost as effective at advancing the VC further ahead‚ to altogether win the war. Booby Traps * Evidence/Details
Free Vietnam War Guerrilla warfare
Singha Corporation Contents: 1. Introduction 2.Strategy analysis 3.Swot analysis and PEST analysis 4. Conclusion and recommend 5. Question 6. Reference Singha Corporation Co.‚ Ltd. About Company Singha Corporation Co.‚ Ltd. is a subsidiary of Boon Rawd Brewery Co.‚ Ltd.‚ the first and largest Brewery of Thailand. The company was incorporated to oversee the beverage business of Boon Rawd Brewery Co.‚ Ltd. and is responsible for the operation and
Premium Marketing
It is important that leadership do not fall into psychological traps hindering them from succession planning‚ product development‚ and acquisition (Hammond‚ Keeney and Raiffa‚ 2006). According to “The Hidden Traps in Decision Making” article written by Hammond‚ Keeney and Raiffa (2006) delivers clear examples of traps people in leadership positions often experiences however‚ the authors give clear solutions in order to combat those traps. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the leadership decision-making
Premium Decision making
Federal Reserve? Q2: What could Bear have done differently to avoid its fate: a) In the early 2000s; b) During the summer of 2007; c) During the week of March 10‚ 2008. Q3: Who stood to benefit from Bear’s failure? Q4: Is market perception of liquidity more important for an investment bank than it is for a traditional manufacturing or distribution business? If so‚ why? Q5: How could Bear have addressed perception of its illiquidity? Could it have stopped the run on the bank? If so‚ why? Q6:
Premium Management Strategic management Marketing
may exist for offsetting a commodity contract at all times. Some future contracts and specific delivery months tend to have increasingly more trading activity and have higher liquidity than others. The most useful indicators of liquidity for these contracts are the trading volume and open interest. There is also dark liquidity‚ referring to transactions that occur off-exchange and are therefore not visible to investors until after the transaction is complete. It does not contribute to public price
Premium Futures contract