Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC GUILLERMO AUSTRIA‚ petitioner‚ vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS (Second Division)‚ PACIFICO ABAD and MARIA G. ABAD‚ respondents. Antonio Enrile Inton for petitioner. Jose A. Buendia for respondents. REYES‚ J.B.L.‚ J.: Guillermo Austria petitions for the review of the decision rendered by the Court of Appeal (in CA-G.R. No. 33572-R)‚ on the sole issue of whether in a contract of agency (consignment of goods for sale) it is necessary
Premium Appellate court Appeal Trial court
In 1976‚ the California Supreme Court ruled that psychotherapists have a duty to warn and protect potential victims if their patients made threats or otherwise behaved as if they presented a serious danger of violence to another. This ruling happened because of the Tarasoff Case of 1969‚ in which the court determined the need for therapists to protect the public was more important than protecting patient-therapist confidentiality. (Vitelli 1) The Tarasoff Case is based on the 1969 murder of a University
Premium Marriage Love Emotion
correct in part‚ at least on some level. It is obvious that the Court‚ as conceived by the Framers‚ is designed to be separate from the vagaries of regular political office. For example‚ in Article I of the Constitution‚ the Senate and the House of Representatives are subject to proscribed terms and limitations. In Article II‚ the President is subject to even more stringent restrictions and a limited term as well. Article III‚ however‚ states that judges are to “hold their Offices during good Behavior
Premium Law Morality Ethics
Pike v. Aurora The issue at hand in this case is whether or not the town ordinance is constitutional. To determine this‚ there are a number of questions that must be asked and laws that must be examined. The first step in determining the constitutionality is knowing and understanding the enumerated powers given to congress under the constitution. Enumerated powers are specific powers listed in the constitution that congress can exercise. If a power is not specifically listed in the constitution
Premium United States Congress United States Constitution Commerce Clause
Supreme Court guidelines * Order dated 28 November 2001 * Each child up to 6 years of age is to get 300 calories and 8-10 gms of protein. * Each malnourished child to get 600 calories and 16-20 grams of protein. * Each pregnant woman‚ nursing mother and adolescent girl to get 500 calories and 20-25 grams of protein. * Every settlement is to have an Anganwadi. * Order dated 29 April 2004 * All 0-6 year old children‚
Premium Nutrition Malnutrition Obesity
Abstract The following is a case summary on United States Supreme Court case 03-633 Roper v. Simmons. Even though many disagree with the death penalty all together‚ even more disagree with the death penalty for juveniles. It is my opinion that anyone over the age of 16 who can premeditate and act upon an event so gruesome that includes either or both rape and murder should be subject to the death penalty. Juvenile offenses continue to rise in number and severity and many of those are because
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Roper v. Simmons United States
giving a movie a rating can go back to days of censorship in the 1900’s. Later on‚ however‚ ratings were developed by the standards of the first head of the MPPDA‚ Will Hays. Through the history of the movie rating system there has been multiple supreme court ruling over the matter of ratings and censorship such as U.S. v. Paramount Pictures‚ Mutual Film Corp v. Industrial Commission‚ and joseph Burstyn v. Wilson (Key). Along with the movie rating system came parents making it a determining factor in
Premium Film Supreme Court of the United States Movie theater
years‚ Supreme Court Cases have had a huge effect on our society and the growth of the United States. The Supreme Court is the highest judicial body in the United States‚ and is the only court established by the Constitution. All of the other courts in the United States must follow the decisions made by the justices of the Supreme Court. The Constitution also gives it the power to judge if a president’s action is unconstitutional. The Court meets in Washington D.C in the United States Supreme Court
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
complex answer one that puzzled the Supreme Court and led to a change in criminal procedure. The verdict was a strict interpretation of the constitution. The fourth amendment was relevant because the fourteenth amendment grunted due process. It was a very good decision‚ it protected the black minority who at the time were being routinely harassed and convicted for no reasons. This decision certainly did not stop that but it made it harder
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
In the case of Katz v. United states‚ 1967‚ The FBI agents acted on a suspicion that Katz maybe transmitting gambling information over the phone to other people in other states. Katz was using a public phone booth to conduct the transactions of information ("Findlaw’s United States Supreme Court Case And Opinions."). The FBI agents then proceeded to attach an eavesdropping device to the outside of the phone booth to record his conversations. With all the recoding that the FBI could get‚ they
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution