Critically examine the extent to which the Rule of Law (ROL) has been implemented in Zimbabwe in an attempt to resolve conflicts and peace making in the Government of National Unity (GNU) The term Rule of Law (ROL) has been defined differently by different scholars hence the varying interpretations and interpretations and implementation by different governments. It is against this background that this monograph would like to examine the extent to which the ROL has been implemented in Zimbabwe from
Premium Political party Zimbabwe
Case Lets ABC and co was partnership firm which had dealership of Scooters Company ltd‚ bought a second hand scooter from Mr. B. ABC and co reconditioned and repaired the scooter. And sold it to Mr. A for Rs 50‚000. ABC and co told Mr. A that the scooter is a new scooter. Is Mr. A a consumer? And does he have any remedy under consumer protection act Mr. Q was going abroad for a business trip for two months. He wanted to give a power of attorney to his friend. Hence Mr. Q sent the Power of
Premium Contract Breach of contract Consumer protection
Obeying the law is a general moral obligation. Usually‚ laws are written from societal ethical codes; therefore the law can embody morality. Obeying the law usually implies the greatest good for the greatest number of people and therefore complies with Mill’s utilitarianism. Especially if the law reflects general morality or protects people from pain‚ such as the admonition against murder‚ utilitarian theorists would argue that obeying the law is a general moral obligation. However‚ there are certain
Premium Utilitarianism John Stuart Mill Jeremy Bentham
Law and Equity Essay (a) Outline the development of common law and equity. There was no system of law in England and Wales before 1066‚ as it was mainly based on customs which were just rules of behaviour and the other used to be the decisions of judges. The law in England and Wales built over the centuries. There were various methods of creating laws which were called “sources of law”. However‚ in the 18th Century Parliament became more powerful which lead the Acts of Parliament (statues) to
Premium Common law Law
including punitive damages for the tort of deceit * Election of Remedies * Can’t rescind contract and sue for damages (some states make you elect‚ or chose) * Requirements for Rescission on the Ground of Misrepresentation * Should be used only when a person has been misled about a fact important to the contract by someone he had the right to rely on * Required element: * Untrue assertion of fact was made * Fact asserted was material or the assertion
Premium Contract law Tort Misrepresentation
to magpies kept as pets. During October 1998 Jerry owned a pet magpie which he kept in a cage at his Brisbane home. He has not notified the Department of Environment and Conservation that he owns a magpie. Has Jerry breached the Act Apply (a) the literal rule‚ and (b) the purposive approach. Issue 1 Has Jerry breached the Act according to the literal rule Law According to the literal rule of statutory interpretation‚ we should always begin by reading a legal text literally‚ with words and phrases
Premium Meaning of life
Definition – the law of Trust determines the relationship among trustee‚ trustor and beneficiaries over the property. Trustor means owner of the property‚ which enjoys extended bundle of rights over his property. Trustee is a person who manages the property. Beneficiary: A beneficiary is anyone who receives benefits from any assets the trust owns. We have two types of trust. First division of types: First is Inter Vivos - the management of the property during one’s lifetime. Mortis Causa –
Premium Trust law Fiduciary Trustee
accused and investigated for violating antitrust laws. In being a monopoly‚ they are one firm that maintains control of this system and creates a barrier for others to enter this market. They were investigated for antitrust actions‚ as they are accused of integrating Windows with Internet Explorer and putting them together as one product in order to force customer to have all of Microsoft’s products. One might ask the question‚ should antitrust laws be enforced in high profile sectors of our economy
Premium Microsoft Operating system Microsoft Windows
Business Law Prof: Adam Pincus 12/6/11 Pros and Cons of Philly’s proposed soda tax ‚ if it had taken place In April of 2010‚ Mayor Michael Nutter proposed a tax on soda (and other sweet beverages)‚ in an attempt to try to generate more revenue for the city and curb the city’s growing child obesity issue. The soda tax was an idea to generate millions of dollars in revenue for the city. The tax would’ve added an estimated $77million to the city’s coffers‚ $20 million of which‚ would go towards
Premium Nutrition Obesity Convenience store
in every case to ensure that the right people or peoples are being charged with the crime. Evidence is extremely important‚ but evidence law is just as important. Evidence law deals with the rules and legal principles that govern the proof of facts in a legal proceeding. For as long as we’ve had evidence law‚ we’ve had controversies associated with evidence law. Throughout this paper‚ I’ll go in depth on the controversies involving the use of DNA evidence‚ child witnesses‚ Miranda warnings‚ and warrantless
Premium Crime Jury Criminal law