Descartes Knowledge The question of our existence in reality is a question which philosophers have tackled throughout time. This essay will look at the phrase‚ cogito ergo sum or I think therefore I am‚ a phrase brought about by Rene Descartes. This phrase is the backbone of Descartes whole philosophy of our existence in reality. As long as we are thinking things‚ we exist. When we look at this approach to our existence we must first deny that any sensory data
Premium Mind Concepts in metaphysics René Descartes
In Descartes’ Meditation‚ he ponders over the idea that he is mistaken and often deceived. He believes that nothing is certain and goes through a series of mind-tests to prove that he is‚ in fact‚ an existence. In doing this‚ he also attempts to prove the existence of God as well as his own existence to ensure that things are certain and indubitable. He first banishes all preconceptions and starts with a clean slate. All knowledge that he knew of previously were through his senses. His senses‚
Premium Metaphysics Epistemology Existence
Innate ideas John Locke‚ a renowned English philosopher in the seventeenth century‚ argued against the pre-existing prevalent belief of innate knowledge‚ such as those led by Descartes. Many of Locke’s arguments begin with criticisms on philosophers’ opinion on innate knowledge‚ notably Descartes. Therefore‚ many of Locke’s arguments are direct rebuttals of Descartes and other philosophers’ beliefs about the existence of innate knowledge. To arrive at the conclusion
Premium Empiricism Epistemology Philosophy
Descartes Optics Descartes’s theories of light and vision were central components of his natural philosophy‚ closely linked to his cosmology‚ physics‚ theory of matter‚ and theory of perception. Descartes replaced traditional explanations of natural phenomena with explanations hidden under terms of matter and motion. By eliminating these theories‚ Descartes needed to formulate new explanations of the qualities of bodies and our perception of them. In other words Descartes goes on to call into
Premium Perception Light
many people‚ including some religions. John Locke has several arguments against innate knowledge; among these‚ the argument that states that if we did in fact possess innate ideas‚ then everybody would agree on at least one idea. There are no principles that everybody aggress on. Therefore‚ innate ideas cannot possibly exist. Locke uses the logic of this argument for several different situations such as the argument for moral innate knowledge. Locke starts off this argument by saying “No moral
Premium Tabula rasa Epistemology Morality
First‚ I explore John Locke’s conception of substance. After‚ I argue that Locke’s theory of substance is necessary for his theory of identity‚ and therefore philosophically vital for Locke’s ethical and political theories. I consider objections to Locke‚ but ultimately defend Locke’s theory of substance and its primacy in Locke’s overall philosophy through a different interpretive approach. Locke’s Substrata: John Locke’s doctrine of substratum—a metaphysical theory that posits that an imperceptible
Premium John Locke Metaphysics Property
Noted by Franklin (1978‚ pp9)‚ since the start of English civil war‚ the attempts to combine king’s authority and the right of resistance had come into question. During this one of most transformative period in English history‚ Locke offers his opinion and provides an adequate solution to sovereignty resistance for all citizens (Franklin‚ ibid‚ pp10). This essay will introduce Locke’s definition of the state of nature and the law of nature‚ and describe how it would influence the creation of a social
Free Political philosophy John Locke Social contract
Damontay Fowler-Thomas Mrs. Lee Social Science September 24‚ 2013 Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are most renowned for their philosophical thoughts. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were two main political philosophers during the seventeenth century. Hobbes is largely known for his writing of the “Leviathan”‚ and Locke for authoring "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding." Included in their essays‚ both men discuss the purpose and structure of government‚ natural law‚ and the characteristics
Premium Political philosophy State of nature Social contract
Locke and Hobbes disagree almost entirely on everything. I would say that Locke thinks of human nature as essentially good while Hobbes views it as essentially evil. Furthermore‚ for Hobbes people leave a state of nature for security‚ as they are driven by year. For Locke‚ however‚ the driving force is possessions and material wealth: we will live better if we form a society instead of living separately in a state of nature. I think their philosophy is different because of they background and also
Premium Political philosophy United States Thomas Hobbes
John Locke – The Second Treatise of Civil Government John Locke * Widely known as the Father of Classical Liberalism * Was an English philosopher and physician regarded as one of the most influential of Enlightenment thinkers * His work had a great impact upon the development of epistemology and political philosophy. * Considered one of the first of the British empiricists. he is equally important to social contract theory. * Published the “Two treatises of Government” in 1689
Free Political philosophy John Locke Social contract