ministers. After finding this out the king issued warrants to have the pamphleteer’s homes ransacked and stripped of all their books and papers. Even back then the pamphleteers knew that their rights were violated and fought back. They stated that the searches were against them‚ similar to a “personal attack” rather than an attack on their information they held within their homes. This is an extremely early case dealing with search and seizure‚ if not one of the first cases‚ in which the individuals
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects people against unreasonable searches and seizures. Modern officials have granted police officers in New York City an incentive to respect the amendment. The Stop and Frisk program employed by the New York Police Department‚ gives police officers the right to initiate a stop of an individual on the street allegedly and do a quick search of their outer clothes for weapons based on if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a crime
Premium Search and seizure United States Constitution New York City
Warrants The right of the people to be secure in their persons‚ houses‚ papers‚ and effects‚ against unreasonable searches and seizures‚ shall not be violated‚ and no warrants shall issue‚ but upon probable cause‚ supported by oath or affirmation‚ and particularly describing the place to be searched‚ and the persons or things to be seized. (1) These words of the Fourth Amendment give the people protection against unnecessary harassment by local‚ state and federal law enforcements. Authorities have
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Searches and seizures
speech‚ and right to privacy are altered. Americans have many rights; one of them being the right against unreasonable searches and seizures. The fourth amendment of The Bill of Rights says that people have a right to not be hassled or investigated without reason. “The right of the people to be secure in their persons‚ houses‚ papers‚ and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures‚ shall not be violated…” (US Const. amend. X). This means that a person is not allowed to be searched without
Premium United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
The movie‚ “The Hurt Locker” directed by Kathryn Bigelow It is a well-known fact that every soldier that goes into combat takes the risk of losing his life. But what is not known‚ perhaps from repression of the thought or ignorance‚ is that it is not just a risk‚ but a guarantee that every soldier will lose his mind. Wounds can heal but horrific memories of the brutality of war will leave psychological scars will remain with the survivors. The movie‚ “The Hurt Locker” provoked me to think differently
Premium Academy Award for Best Picture Psychology English-language films
Question 3: Discuss what a trained dog can use scent evidence to perform. Answer: According to Gardner and Anderson (2016)‚ “dogs have been used to pursue fugitives‚ locate escaped convicts‚ find missing persons‚ detect drugs and explosives‚ and‚ in recent years‚ identify suspects in a lineup” (p. 412). Since dogs have a much better smell than humans‚ they can help officers search for evidence (Gardner & Anderson‚ 2016). Trained drug sniffing dogs help law enforcement by alerting officers if they
Premium Police Dog Crime
Emily Arochi Plain View/Open Fields ADJ/275 February 7‚ 2010 In our readings the plain view doctrine states “that items that are within the sight of an officer who is legally in a place from which the view is made may properly be seized without a warrant—as long as such items are immediately recognizable as subject to seizure”. There are some requirements of the plain view doctrine. One requirement is the awareness of the items solely through the officer’s sight. Another requirement is that
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Police United States Constitution
para. 4) The arguments that Mopak Corporation will make in response to the wrongful termination suit are that in the employees’ policy manual‚ handbooks or contracts reflect that the employee and/or contract workers must agree to random vehicle searches‚ random drug testing‚ and an at will clause for employment; that when signed by the employees and/or contract workers‚ it becomes binding‚ implied‚ or implied-in-fact contracts. In the 1988 decision of landmark case Foley vs. Interactive Data
Premium Employment
may be a danger to the community. The Fourth Amendment protects individuals against unreasonable searches. The amendment also states that no warrant shall be issued without a probable cause. The objective basis of the law is to conduct searches when there is enough evidence to back up the accusation or claim that is being made. Modern jurisprudence has given officers the incentive to conduct searches without a warrant. All an officer needs to conduct a search is reasonable suspicion that an individual
Premium Terry v. Ohio New York City Search and seizure
Fourth Amendment has been held to mean that a warrant must be judicially given for a search or an arrest. In order for a warrant to be considered reasonable‚ it must be supported by probable cause. The Fourth Amendment also applies to governmental searches and seizures‚ but not those done by private citizens or organizations who are not acting on behalf of a government. An important test case of the Fourth Amendment was Katz v. United States (Document A). This case showed that if a person seeks to
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Government United States Constitution