placed upon search and seizure in public schools. Assess to limits to search and seizure is communications devices‚ searches of online information‚ basics on searches in school and searches by law enforcement officers. School has a no
Premium Education Law United States Constitution
Thomas Robertson Sunday August 19‚ 2012 Human Rights Search and Seizure First let me start off by saying that‚ after reading the account of what happened to Trixee‚ in my opinion Trixee has a VALID argument that both Officer Fletcher and manager violated her fourth amendment rights against “search and seizure” as well as her constitutional rights. I will now explain my opinion by clarifying the Issues of fourth amendment violation by ShowTime and Officer Fletcher‚ the rules (laws) that were
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Law United States Constitution
warrant is required‚ certain steps must be taken. There are 3 requirements that must be met before a warrant can be secured. There are 6 general rules for serving warrants .Police and the Rule of Law captures the nuances of 7 types of warrantless searches and arrest. Katz v. United States is the key Supreme Court case dealing with Electronic Surveillance which discusses the nature of the right to privacy. Recent electronic surveillance technologies that have benefited the police include GPS tracking
Premium Exclusionary rule United States Constitution Law
trying drugs. If by testing the athletes or other school leaders‚ we can get them to say no to drugs‚ it will be easier for other kids to say no. Cons Amendment 4 guarantees the right to privacy and some say that is being violated by random drug searches. Some also argue that students who aren’t doing anything wrong have nothing to fear. This ignores the fact that what they fear is not getting caught‚ but the loss of dignity and trust that the drug test represents‚ so while they think they may be
Premium
Challenge Agency’s Decision Date: December 7‚ 2008 ISSUES 1. Is it unlawful for an agency to require all public school students to undergo a search of their clothes‚ backpacks‚ lockers‚ and desks each morning? 2. Is it unlawful for an agency to permit random searches to take place of students’ clothes‚ backpacks‚ lockers‚ and desks? 3. Is it unlawful for an agency to give no notice or hearing prior to the enactment of new rules and regulations? 4. Is it unlawful for an agency to refrain from sending
Premium Law Administrative law Mobile phone
in public schools‚ but‚ the Courts give school officials and police more flexibility to conduct searches in school. In this case and law review you will learn about two different cases where Courts balance a student’s privacy rights against the school’s interest in safety and student discipline. This means that students often have less protection against what they might perceive as unreasonable searches and seizures at school‚ than in other places. The Fifth Amendment is concerned with fundamental
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
unreasonable searches and seizures‚ shall not be violated‚ and no Warrants shall issue‚ but upon probable cause‚ supported by Oath or affirmation‚ and particularly describing the place to be searched‚ and the persons or things to be seized" (“Fourth Amendment‚” n.d.‚ para .1). In this case‚ school officials had reason to believe a physical education teacher was stealing money from students. The school officials decided to have two hidden video cameras installed in the office of the locker room. This
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Law
Once that rumor is brought to attention‚ administration is expected to perform an investigation and if a search and seizure is required of them‚ it must be a search relative to the scope of the issue at hand. For example‚ a search of a student’s locker or car on school property with the belief that there may be drugs would be a sufficient search where as a strip search of the student’s body would be considered intrusive. The facts of the two cases‚ Best V. New Jersey and Safford V. Redding‚ clearly
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Police
Week 4 Assignment When it comes to random student locker searches‚ I feel that all teachers have the responsibility to give any information that they may have concerning any illegal acts that their students are involved in. If this information leads to the administration searching that student’s locker‚ then it is being done to make sure all the students are being kept safe. I do not feel that anyone’s locker should be searched without a significant amount of proof or suspicion. It should not be
Free Education School Teacher
suspended for a kiss on the cheek‚ a 5th grader was expelled for bringing ibuprofen to school. Many argue that this kind of action taken by authority is a threat to the basic rights. Forcing students to go through metal detectors‚ and permitting drug searches without consent is not only robbing
Premium Law Education Teacher