Vision Mission Objectives Corporate Values Key Influences on Strategic Purpose Description Models/tools Corporate Governance Stakeholder Expectations A. Social Responsibility and Ethics A. Shareholder Model Stakeholder Model Benefits Disadvantages Stakeholder mapping: the power/interest matrix Minimal effort Keep informed Keep satisfied Key players Corporate Social Responsibility Stances: Laissez-faire Enlightened self-interest
Premium Stakeholder Business ethics Social responsibility
Unit 9: Final Project Part III Kaplan University LS 312-02 Ethics and the Legal Environment Date: January 17‚ 2012 Unit 9: Final Project The recent proposal by a board director that approval be given to use their title when calling personal potential clients presents a significant ethical concern for Energy Cooperative. Allowing a board member to use their title for personal gain contradicts several ethical theories‚ to include Mill’s utilitarian theory‚ Kant’s categorical imperative
Premium Board of directors Ethics Corporate governance
Corporate Social Responsibility and Emergent Models in Management of Stakeholder Capital in Philippine Conglomerates Serafin D. Talisayon Fifth International Research Workshop on Asian Business Singapore Management University‚ Singapore 13 April 2009 Abstract The paper adopts a social benefit-cost analysis framework to look at three stages in the historical development of management of stakeholder capital of corporations in the Philippines. The first two stages were government-driven. Stage One
Premium Management Corporation Corporate social responsibility
Philips Electronics “Stakeholders (or interest groups) are tangible‚ visible and approachable groups or institutions which have a direct influence on the functioning of an organisation.” INTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS Employees Philips employees work in different divisions: Healthcare‚ Lighting‚ Consumer Lifestyle and Innovation & Emerging Businesses. Within these divisions‚ you can have a general leadership position‚ occupy a functional leadership position‚ you can be specialist‚ etc. Philips says it’s
Premium Federal government of the United States Stock Shareholder
Case Content/Instructions 1. Introduce the organization/company‚ the case‚ and provide a brief history of the organization. 2. Provide a clear‚ concise statement of the problem(s)/issues(s). 3. Identify primary and secondary internal and external stakeholders affected‚ describe their stakes in the issue‚ analyze the situation for effect on these stakeholders‚ and describe the issues and impact from the stakeholders’ views. 4. Summarize the primary and secondary ethical issues(s)
Premium Corporate social responsibility Stakeholder analysis Corporation
Corporate Responsibility (2) Stakeholder perspective Obesity and fast food Use the stakeholder analysis to look at the impact of fast food (eg MacDonald’s) on each stakeholder group. Should the sale/marketing of fast food be regulated/ restricted? If so why? If not‚ why not? Childhood obesity has been labeled one of the most serious public health issues if the 21st century. 42 million of the children under five years old are overweight all over the world‚ in
Premium Nutrition Business ethics Ethics
Katelyn Anderson Corporate Social Responsibility Project – BA 342 FA14 Opening Alcoa is a global front-runner in lightweight metals technology‚ manufacturing and engineering. They are most popular for being a leading producer of primary and fabricated aluminum and are ranked 130 on the Fortune 1000. Alcoa revolutionizes multi-material resolutions that directly enhance global progression and expansion. Alcoa’s technologies improve means of automotive‚ commercial‚ air and space transportation. They
Premium Sustainability Corporate social responsibility
Research paper CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY/PHILANTROPY A CASE STUDY OF KENYA AIRWAYS Presented to DR. MAGETO By CHRISTOPHER TARUS 09-0478 Date 07TH APRIL 2010 Table of contents Introduction............................................................................................................ 3 Corporate Social responsibility................................................................................4 Good citizenry..............................
Premium Corporate social responsibility Social responsibility Corporation
Sauder School of Business University of British Columbia Corporate Social Responsibility BASM 580B – Period 5 Instructor: Office: Phone: Email: Office Hours: Angela Kelleher HA 563 (604) 454-2243 Angela.Kelleher@sauder.ubc.ca Wednesdays 5:00-6:00pm‚ or by appointment Overview This course is designed to engage students in a discussion of Corporate Social Responsibility through a series of interactive learning activities. The course will begin with preparing the students to discuss and debate
Premium Corporate social responsibility Social responsibility
practices. She has been instructed by her General Manager‚ Eddie‚ to ignore these potential violations or it will cost her the job. Jane is still in a probationary status with the company and is not sure what the correct course of action should be. The stakeholders in this particular situation are Jane‚ Brad‚ Eddie‚ Greg‚ the other R&S technicians and employees as well as R&S customers. The potential impact of Jane’s decision could mean loss of jobs‚ lost revenue‚ negative brand image‚ performance issues
Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant Morality