Sterling computer has entered into a partnership with NoBugs a microchip processing computer. The collaboration was developing into a something successful until an incident put a strain in the business relationship. Some month ago Sterling computer has had several of their computers explode shortly after customers install them. Upon an investigation which was conducted by Sterling researchers have discovered evidence of NoBugs’s microchips aggravating a dormant defect in their computers‚ causing
Premium Contract Civil procedure Lawsuit
a new dress‚ shoes and accessories for the date. He does not turn up and does not text you with an explanation. Can you sue him? If so‚ why? If not‚ why not? She would be unable to sue him as this is a social agreement which is unenforceable by law. Neither party has entered into a legally binding contract. Should you chose to break such an agreement‚ the consequences will be no more serious than upsetting or dissappointing your friends. This is similar to the case of Spellman v Spellman‚ in
Premium Contract
Smith but it cannot be enforceable by law. 09. Yes‚ Leitner’s proposal was supported by consideration because he was promised to pay 3‚500 within next 5 years‚ but his son refused to pay the partners the amount agreed on. 10. When the common object of a contract can no longer be carried out‚ the court may declare the contract has been frustrated. There are some ways of frustration. The names are given below: I. Destruction of an object‚ II. Changes of law‚ III. Failure of pre-conditions IV
Premium Contract Contract law
Question 1 The issue of this question is whether Scott and Kyle can bring legal action against Wayne for what they feel is a breach of contract. Under the law governing offer and acceptance‚ a valid offer has been made through an advertisement. In order for an offer to be accepted‚ the party must entirely accept the offer. The rules governing acceptance has to be positive not passive. Silence does not forms acceptance. The general rule of acceptance is that the acceptance must be received by
Premium Offer and acceptance Contract Option contract
refused to carry out it. The different point is case did not have the intention to create a legal relations‚ but Anthony’s case did. Therefore‚ the previous one is not binding‚ but the latter one is binding. The second condition is about the family law‚ there are two different cases and they happened between husband and wife. The first one is Balfour v Balfour (1919)‚ it states that the husband promised to give the wife maintenance payments‚ because he worked overseas. After reaching this agreement
Premium Marriage Case study Consideration
if management thinks it’s warranted.” Profits remain high‚ but no bonus is paid. If the employees sue‚ would a court enforce the promise? The fact that a promise has been made does not mean the promise can or will be enforced. Under the common law‚ a primary basis for the enforcement of promises is consideration. Consideration usually is defined as the value (such as cash) given in return for a promise (in a bilateral contract) or in return for a performance (in a unilateral contract) Something
Premium Contract Law Promise
Business Discussion You own University Heights Apartments‚ a business that rents primarily to students. One evening‚ your tenant Sharon is attacked by an intruder who forces the lock on the sliding glass door of her ground-floor apartment. Sharon’s screams attract the attention of Darryl‚ your resident manager‚ who comes to Sharon’s aid. Together‚ he and Sharon drive the intruder off‚ but not before they both are badly cut by the intruder. 1. Is the intruder liable for what he has done? a. Yes
Premium Physical security Door Storey
Any Kind Checks Cashed‚ Inc. v. Talcott it was crucial to determine whether holder of the instrument acted in good faith and fair dealing‚ as is required to have status of holder in due course. The definition of “good faith” is found in Commercial Law Article § 3-103(a)(4): “Good faith’ means honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing.” The court upheld a trial court finding’s that Any Kind had not acted in good faith in cashing a check for $10‚000 but
Premium Court Appeal Trial
Sale of Goods Ordinance‚ Cap 26 shall apply in this case given the fact that the motorcycle seller sold the second hand motorcycle to Sam as a course of business‚ a legally binding contractual relationship for sale of goods was established although there was no information as to whether Sam bought the motorcycle was for business or private use. Besides‚ the car shall be defined as goods under (s.2(1)) of the aforesaid ordinance. The motorcycle seller was in breach of the implied conditions in
Premium Tort Tort law Reasonable person
adequate steps to shut down such activities or investigate the extent of the employee’s violations of company policy. This is a very chilling opinion for employers to digest. Employer Promises re: Privacy 2. One of the most common questions from our business clients is whether their promises regarding email and other workplace privacy issues are legally binding. Not necessarily is the response we give. Usually‚ when an employer states a policy regarding any issue in the workplace‚ including privacy issues
Premium Employment Law Privacy