Glenna Morgan DAAC Ch 6 assignment DAAC 1304 READ CHAPTER 6 1. What is the difference between cocaine and crack? I have found seven differences between cocaine and crack. They are as follows: Popularity: Crack has become more and more popular as the years have progressed. The use of cocaine as a freebase declined in popularity in the 1980s when it was discovered that mixing cocaine with simple household chemicals‚ including baking soda and water‚ and then drying it resulted in a lump
Premium Drug addiction Cocaine
A mandatory minimum sentence occurs when judicial discretions are limited by law (Famm). Those who are convicted of certain crimes must be punished with at least the minimum number of years depending on the offense. Amanda Dollak who received her criminal justice degree at CTU‚ states “Mandatory sentences require every individual to receive the same punishment for similar offenses‚ regardless of how much a judge may object to the sentence”. These mandatory sentencing laws however vary
Premium English language Management Language education
rationales for sentencing will allow the following four arguments to be understood with greater clarity. To begin‚ the first argument to support the urgent need to restructure the criminal justice system is the effect and impact of mandatory minimum sentencing on the high rates of incarcerations. The effects of mandatory minimum sentencing are staggering‚ and transcend into many different areas of the criminal justice system. The principal justification for the creation of mandatory minimum sentences
Premium Crime Criminal justice Prison
Sometimes mandatory minimum sentences are the consequences of good intentions‚ but good intentions do not always make beneficial policy in society. One of the famous senior associate justice of the supreme court of the United have said the truth of federal mandatory sentencing‚ in which I used this quotation to relate to the topic that I’m about to discuss. “The Federal sentencing guidelines should be revised downward. By contrast to the guidelines‚ I can accept neither the necessity nor the wisdom
Premium Crime Prison Capital punishment
Plea Bargains and Mandatory Sentencing I would like to take this time to explain my position on Plea Bargains and Mandatory Sentencing. I will show both pros and cons for each topic‚ as well as give you my personal brief on which one I support. There are two types of plea bargains : The first one is a charge bargain. When the prosecutor allows a defendant to "plead guilty to a lesser charge"‚ or to only some of the charges that have been filed against him. For example‚ a defendant charged
Premium Criminal law Judge Plaintiff
mandatory minimums as a way to keep offenders in prison for a longer period of time. However‚ evidence provided by the media is not entirely honest. Studies conducted by Statistics Canada have shown an extensive decline in non-violent and violent crimes over the past two decades. The Crime Severity Index (CSI) has decreased by 3% since 2013‚ “declining from 68.8% to 65.7%; [which was attributed] to a [decline] in robberies and breaking and entering” (Boyce‚ 2014‚ pg.3). In 2014‚ the Police Reported
Premium Crime Criminology Unemployment
agreed with at the ending. “We cant keep doing what were doing.” What needs to be focus on is how we can prevent crime‚ specifically drug crime. This means an overall of the Criminal Justice system. Julie Stewart advocates for ’Families Against Mandatory Minimums’ and I agree with the moment shes trying to pass. Were filling our jail and prisons with low level offenders. As a result were perpetuating the cycle as kids see their parents go off to jail‚ and these youths thinking they too at some point
Premium Crime Police Criminal justice
disadvantaged minorities in inner-city communities. The mandatory minimums created a round-up effect that many believed to do with the decline in criminal rates since the early 1990s. However‚ this decline mirrors that of Canada‚ whose prison population was actually declining in comparison to the rise of incarceration in the United States (Smith‚ Goggin and Gendreau 2002). This means then that a direct statement on the mandatory minimum sentencing cannot adequately explain the decline in criminal activity;
Premium Crime
help eliminate drug abuse. With the monetary aid‚ the government created strict policies to crack down on drug abusers‚ policies still in effect today. The current policies addressing the sentencing of nonviolent drug users are ineffective and revisions to the policies should occur. The mandatory minimums sentences‚ low risk of violence‚ accompanied by no economic benefits provide clear reasons why
Premium Crime Drug addiction Prison
Mandatory sentencing: judges are too soft on criminals. Their entire focus should be on punishment and retribution‚ and if they keep wasting their time with other considerations then we should introduce mandatory sentencing. To what extent do you agree and why? The sentencing system should not be altered‚ for decreasing the focus and increasing the frequency of sentencing would do more harm than good. An emphasis on merely punishment and retribution in criminal sentencing would prevent the right
Premium Law Crime