Case Name: National Legal Services Authority (Petitioner) v Union of India & Ors. (Respondent). Court Name: Supreme Court of India. Bench: J.‚ K.S. Radhakrishnan & J.‚ A.K. Sikri. Date of Decision: April 15‚ 2014. Citation: AIR 2014 SC 1863. Statement of Facts: 1. The National Legal Services Authority filed a writ petition no. 400 of 2012 seeking relief that Hijras/ Eunuchs/ Transgenders (herein after refer as TG) be given legal status as ‘third gender’ with legal and constitutional provision.
Premium Human rights Universal Declaration of Human Rights Law
At the beginning‚ the Electronic Testing Operations (ETO) measured two components of cost: direct labor and burden‚ but the burden is grouped into a single cost pool that includes all costs and divided by direct labor dollars to obtain the burden rate. (Q2) ETO’s manager picked up 5 components to evaluate the impact of different accounting system. The reported costs from existing system can be computed as follows‚ given the burden rate 145%: Product Direct Labor Burden Total Costs ICA 917 1
Premium Costs
Resources Management September 5‚ 2011 Case Analysis Question: What is Strategic Human Resources Management and how does it link the people with the strategic needs of the business? Introduction Human resource management is a combination of strategically coordinated efforts to manage people. Managing people involves‚ employing them‚ teaching and developing their skills‚ and utilizing‚ maintaining and compensating their services (Mello‚ 2010). In most cases the strategic method of human resource
Premium Human resource management Human resources Strategic management
of Marks & Spencer plc v David Halsey case (Case C-446/03) Currently‚ for the purpose of clear understandidng it is proposed to look through Marks & Spencer judgement basing on the on the following main aspects: I. The procedural background of the case : jurisdictions involved and procedure II. The facts. III. The arguments of the parties IV. The court’s decision V. Comment on the case Marks and Spencer v Halsey case is an international case about
Premium European Union United Kingdom
Economic conditions change‚ competitors launch new assaults and the product passes through new stages of buyer interest and requirements (Kotler‚ 2001‚ p. 484). Consequently a company must plan strategies that address any changes in the market. ebay Inc. is the world’s largest and most popular person-to-person trading community on the internet (Bradley‚ 2001‚ p. 1). From its inception eBay was unchallenged however with amazon.com’s (Amazon) entrance into the online person-to-person auction arena and
Premium Brand Branding Brand management
Brown v. Southall Realty Co.‚ District of Columbia Court of Appeals‚ 1968‚ 237 A.2d. Parties: Lillie Brown‚ Defendant‚ Appellant Southall Realty‚ Plaintiff‚ Appellee Mr. Penn‚ Owner Judicial History: The Plaintiff‚ Southall Realty‚ filed suit to evict the defendant‚ Lillie Brown‚ for unpaid rent. The defendant contested that the rent was unpaid due to an illegal contract that was in violation of sections 2304 and 2501 of the D.C. Housing Regulations. The trial court of the District of
Premium Appeal Contract Lease
investigators get the training and knowledge they need prior to conducting even one interview. They also should have classes yearly that reinforce and go over any changes in the law. One case that every company with union employees need to understand is the landmark case of NLRB v. J. Weingarten‚ Inc. (CASE INFO) During the course of an investigatory interview‚ the employee asked for and was denied the presence
Premium Police Interview Interrogation
a. Explain the technology or innovation introduced in the cases. Cannon knew that his compact echo machine‚ which he carried under his arm by a single handle‚ would have to perform competitively in a room filled with state-of-the-art echo machines made by long-standing competitors such as Hewlett Packard -- each machine weighing more than the average NFL linesman and costing nearly a quarter of a million dollars. To view the functioning of the heart‚ the face of the transducer‚ which was
Premium Disruptive technology Marketing Innovation
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2014] FCAFC 115 Citation: D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2014] FCAFC 115 Appeal from: Cancer Voices Australia v Myriad Inc [2013] FCA 65 Parties: YVONNE D’ARCY v MYRIAD GENETICS INC and GENETIC TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED File number: NSD 359 of 2013 Judges: ALLSOP CJ‚ DOWSETT‚ KENNY‚ BENNETT & MIDDLETON JJ Date of judgment: 5 September 2014 Catchwords: PATENTS – Patent including claims for isolated nucleic
Premium Jury Supreme Court of the United States United States
ASANTE TECHNOLOGIES‚ INC. v. PMC-SIERRA‚ INC. 164 F. Supp. 2d 1142 (N.D. Cal. 2001) Legal Case Analysis The lawsuit results from a dispute involving the sale of electronic parts. The plaintiff‚ Assante Technologies is a Delaware corporation with its primary place of business in Santa Clare‚ California. Assante entered into a contract with Unique Technologies‚ located in California; which is the distributor of PMC-Sierra‚ Inc. located in British Columbia‚ Canada. The plaintiff alleges that the Defendant
Premium United States Jurisdiction Pleading