Australian engineer who worked as a strategic planner for General Electric. From GE‚ Henderson joined the management consultancy A rt hur D. Li tt le. In 1963‚ he announced that he was leaving to set up his own consultancy‚ the Boston Consulting Group (BCG). An engineering hybrid The first model discovered — or in this case rediscovered — by Henderson was something of an antique. In the 1920s‚ an obscure company called Curtiss Aircraft came up with the concept of the "learning curve"‚ which also
Premium Strategic management Management consulting
executives actually have to use several conceptual models to be efficient particularly in their decision making. First of all‚ we will determine why conceptual models are so commonly used in strategic management. Then‚ we will describe and explain the BCG Growth / Share Matrix and finally‚ we will evaluate the different strengths and weaknesses of this conceptual model by analyzing and synthesizing the views of several authors. More abstract from Conceptual models in strategic management: The Boston
Premium Strategic management Management Management consulting
BCG matrix has been a tool for Malaysian brands to classify and evaluate the products and services of a business. It is a decision making tool in order to balance the activities of a company among those which make profits‚ those who ensure growth‚ those which constitute the future of the firm or those who are its heritage. With this tool one is able to define the development policy of the company. The matrix will position the products/services in two ways which are the rate of growth of the market
Premium Product management Management Marketing
BCG MATRIX‚ GE FOR A PRODUCT PORTFOLIO ERUKULLA SURESH -138919 SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT‚ NIT WARANGAL SUBJECT: MARKETING ENVIRONMENT AND ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENT-2 SUBMITTED TO DR.RITANJALI MAJHI‚ ASSISTANT PROFESSOR‚ SOM ON 9TH OCTOBER 2013 ABSTRACT BCG matrix is a framework created by Boston Consulting Group to evaluate the strategic position of the business brand portfolio and its potential. It classifies business portfolio into four categories based on industry attractiveness (growth
Premium Strategic management Investment Dimension
BCG Matrix of KFC The need for strategy‚ in order to expand its existing product in very promising markets for KFC is very essential. KFC‚ along with McDonalds‚ and other major fast food chains have dominated the American continent as well as else where. Since the1950’s when the founder of KFC had a dream‚ of building an empire in the fast foodmarket‚ the company has undergone lots of changes. The company has changedownership; it has taken over from Pepsi and passed over to Tricon‚ which owns
Premium Strategic management
The BCG matrix can be used to determine the appropriate mission of an organization with four common missions to choose from: Build (?)‚ Hold (Star)‚ Harvest (Cash Cow)‚ Divest (Dog). Yellow Trubrite Dye: 1) For Monarch‚ In the BCG matrix I think this product should be Build (?)‚ it is because Monarch got about 50% of the market share‚ however because of the obsolescent technologies used‚ the vast industry overcapacity‚ the severe price competition‚ the limited profitability‚ the possibility of
Premium Marketing Strategic management Management
Limitations of the BCG model. The BCG model is criticised for having a number of limitations (Kotler 2003; McDonald 2003): ➢ There are other reasons other than relative market share and market growth that could influence the allocation of resources to a product or SBU: reasons such as the need for strong brand name and product positioning could compel resource allocation to an SBU or product (Drummond & Ensor 2004). ➢ What is more‚ the model rests on net cash consumption or generation as the
Premium Marketing Economics Cash flow
BCG Matrix Product Relative Market Share Market Growth Classification Note D 2 Leader 3% Low Cash Cow Generates more cash than needed to maintain business. Requires frequent “milking” and very little investment. A 3 Leader 20% High Star Requires a high level of funding to battle competitors and maintain growth rate. When industry slows‚ has potential to become cash cow if market share is retained. C 1 Co-Leader 25% High C 1 Co-Leader 25% High Question Mark Potential to gain market share and
Premium Marketing Stock market Strategic management
QUESTION 1 Are the four components of Marriott´s financial strategy consistent with its growth objective? With regards to the overall strategy of primarily being a premier growth company‚ we analyze the 4 components as follows: 1. Manage rather than own hotel assets • Marriott developed the projects‚ established long term management contracts consisting of 3% of revenues and 20% of the profits. The assets were then sold to partners. Not owning hotels provided Marriot with greater liquidity
Premium Finance Weighted average cost of capital Investment
Executive Summary We found the weighted average cost of capital for Marriott as a whole to be 9.68%. The divisions of Lodging‚ Contract Services and Restaurants had WACCs of 8.14%‚ 13.33%‚ and 9.63% respectively. The only variable between these divisions that remains consistent is the tax rate. Marriott has a target rate for each of the divisions’ capital structures‚ which affects their debt and equity betas. Also‚ there are stark differences between the betas in the segments‚ as well as the
Premium Management Education Psychology