Pfizer Inc.’S Cost of Capital and Capital structure - Xiaoyue Shi The costs of capital and capital structures for Pfizer Inc. and its two competitors Merck & Co. Inc. and Johnson & Johnson in the pharmaceutical industry are analyzed in this memo. When calculating the cost of common stock for the three companies‚ three different approaches including Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)‚ Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) and the bond yield plus risk premium are applied (Appendix A). For CAPM approach
Premium Stock market Stock Weighted average cost of capital
Best Practices in Estimating the Cost of Capital: Survey and Synthesis Robert F. Bruner‚ Kenneth M. Eades‚ Robert S. Harris‚ and Robert C. Higgins This paper pn ^ents ihns‚ Wn Itujjlini; finunaal advtsi-i’s. lUic -M-ven‚ best selling texlho(>k.\ and trade hooks. The re.sulls show close aligninvn! ainuu-^:‚ all lh< M S‚ y’i’jps an ihc use of common theoreliva! frameworks and on many aspects of estimation. We Jin a ’’an.>( •arunhtn. however‚ for the joint choices oflhe nsk-free rate. heia.
Premium Finance Weighted average cost of capital Risk
Brief 1. What is the weighted Average Cost of Capital for Marriot Corporation? WACC for Marriott Corp is 11.89 WACC of divisions: Lodging 10.29‚ Restaurant 13.49‚ Contract Services 13.615 a) What risk-free rate and the risk premium did you use to calculate the cost of equity? We used 8.95% as the risk free rate (LT Government Debt) and the MRP we used was 7.43%‚ which means are expected market return is 8.95+7.43=16.38% b) How did you measure Marriott’s cost of debt? We added the credit spread
Free Arithmetic mean Average Weighted average cost of capital
Marriott Corporation and Project Chariot The Marriott Corporation (MC)‚ had seen a long‚ successful reign in the hospitality industry until the late 1980s. An economic downturn and the 1990 real estate crash resulted in MC owning newly developed hotel properties with no potential buyers in sight and a mound of debt. During the late 1980s‚ MC had promised in their annual reports to sell off some of their hotel properties and reduce their burden of debt. However‚ the company made little progress
Premium Marketing Brand Management
MEMORANDUM TO: Mariott Corporation Board of Directors FROM: Chanunnett Manoonpong‚ Rennick Palley‚ Zhihui Zhang‚ Aaron (Jialin) Zhong DATE: August 22nd‚ 2013 ------------------------------------------------- RE: Mariott Corporation Capital Structure ------------------------------------------------- Marriott Corporation‚ with its comparative advantage in hotel development and management‚ has expected excellent future growth and profitability. Such increase in sales might bring in extra cash
Premium Stock Finance Weighted average cost of capital
Using the beta that you have chosen‚ estimate the expected return on an equity investment in the companies to a short term investor a long term investor As a manager in this firm‚ how would you use this expected return? 3. Estimating Default Risk and Cost of Debt Does it have any recent borrowings? If yes‚ what interest rate did the company pay on these borrowing? 4. Short-term solvency or liquidity
Premium Finance Investment Term
Marriott Rooms Forecasting Case Study This case involves the study of the Hamilton Hotel and the use of forecasting to help predict their demand on a specific day. Marriott Hotels operated the Hamilton hotel. Marriott has been known for a culture that puts people first. Marriott is recognized worldwide for their enduring values‚ their spirit to serve‚ and their corporate commitment to creating better places to live and work. 1) Critical Issue: The critical issue is the manager has to choose
Premium Hotel Hotels Motel
13% of sales in 1987 respectively. Marriott is determined to develop and to enhance its position in each division and remain a premier growth company as stated in the annual report (1987). This key objective implies to become the most profitable company‚ be the preferred provider as well as preferred employer. Analysis the four key elements of Marriott’s financial strategy we arrive at the following conclusion: a) Managing rather than owning hotels assets‚ Marriott can become more focused on its core
Premium Rate of return Finance Weighted average cost of capital
systems that were similar in nature. Additionally‚ competitors such Starwood hotels began developing member loyalty programs that resulted in far higher guest engagement‚ (5% of guests amassed to roughly 20% of the company’s revenue). Nonetheless‚ Marriott is very intuitive when it comes to business intelligence‚ but its competitive advantage with analytics is quickly eroding and it needs to start focusing on other aspects of the business to remain the industry leader. 2. Describe your company’s position
Premium Hotel Marketing Hotels
personal lives” [ (Galinsky‚ Wigton‚ & Backon‚ 2009) ]. There are new trends that employers have integrated to deal with the recession in constructive ways‚ such as allowing employees to work at home one or two days a week to save on commuting costs‚ allowing employees greater scheduling flexibility if their spouses have lost a job or seen their hours reduced and the family needs to make changes‚ and reassigning responsibilities when no hiring is possible [ (Galinsky‚ Wigton‚ & Backon‚ 2009)
Premium Marriott International Management