"Matimak trading co v khalily and d a y kids sportswear inc case brief" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 10 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chappell & Co Ltd v The Nestlé Co Ltd   [1959] 2 All ER 701 House of Lords   Nestlé‚ manufacturers of wrapped chocolate bars‚ advertised for sale‚ as part of an advertising campaign‚ the record ’Rockin’ Shoes’. The price of the record was 1s 6d plus three wrappings from their 6d chocolate bars. Chappell‚ who were the sole licensees of the copyright of ’Rockin’ Shoes’‚ claimed that Nestlé had infringed their copyright and sought injunction and damages. Nestlé claimed that they were entitled to

    Premium Gramophone record Contract Sales

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case brief

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hannah David 11 February 2013 Business Law Rothing v. Kallestad Issues: 1) Whether the district court erred in concluding that hay is not a “product “for purposes of a strict liability in tort cause of action. 2) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings negligence claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses‚ thus no duty of care existed. 3) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that

    Premium Tort Contract law Implied warranty

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief

    • 7225 Words
    • 24 Pages

    DEVRY UNIVERSITY 3005 HIGHLAND PKWY DOWNERS GROVE‚ IL 60515-5799 Terms: (Nadel v. Burger King Corp.‚ 1997 Ohio App. LEXIS 2144) Source: Company Profiles and Directories;US Law Reviews and Journals‚ Combined;Federal & State Court Cases - After 1944‚ Combined;Newspaper Stories‚ Combined Papers Combined Source: Company Profiles and Directories;US Law Reviews and Journals‚ Combined;Federal & State Court Cases - After 1944‚ Combined;Newspaper Stories‚ Combined Papers Project ID: 7 of 8

    Free Product liability

    • 7225 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    United States v. Jones‚ United States Supreme Court (2012) 132 S. Ct. 945 Facts of the Case Respondent Jones was a subject of a Government investigation in part of a much larger drug trafficking conspiracy. As part of the investigation‚ FBI agents had obtained a court order to place a GPS tracking device on a vehicle driven by Jones – a Jeep registered to Jone’s wife. The court order was issued in the District of Columbia and was set to expire 10 days after it was signed by the judge. On Day

    Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    IRAC Writing Assignment‚ Chapter 3 1. Case Name‚ Citation‚ and Court Peoples Trust Company of Bergen County v. Kozuck 98 N.J. Super. 235‚ 236 A.2d 630‚ N.J. Super. Lexis 389 (1967) Superior court of New Jersey‚ Law Division 2. Key Facts A. Peoples Trust Company of Bergen County is a bank located in New Jersey. B. Saul and Elaine Kozuck‚ husband and wife‚ signed a promissory note with Peoples Trust Company. The Kozucks contend the due date was improperly filled in by the bank

    Premium Service of process Complaint

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    this essay I shall limit my investigation to the ethical concerns surrounding the very lucrative sportswear industry‚ the sports wear supply chain‚ and how it impacts on the lives of people world wide. Sportswear marketing is now aimed at all sectors of society‚ irrespective of age‚ sex or social class‚ it has grown into a multi million dollar industry (Lancaster & Reynolds‚ 2005). Although sportswear is essential for athletes and sports players‚ millions of people the world over buy and wear branded

    Premium Ethics Business ethics

    • 2990 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case brief

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Private Movie Co.‚ Inc. v. Pamela Lee Anderson et al. 1. What are the facts? The Private Movie Company (Efraim) sued Pamela Lee Anderson for $4.6 million for walking away from oral and written contracts. The defendant (Anderson) claims to have agreed to the contracts on the stipulation that the script would be revised concerning nudity and simulated sex scenes‚ and upon reading the final script and seeing simulated sex scenes still included‚ walked out. 2. What is the legal issue? The

    Premium Contract Void Gentlemen's agreement

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    M-Commerce 1.1 Introduction M-commerce is also known as Mobile Commerce which is another form of wireless E-commerce. As M-commerce is "the delivery of electronic commerce capabilities directly into the hands‚ anywhere‚ via wireless technology" and "putting a retail outlet in the customer’s hands anywhere." This can be done with just a mobile phone‚ a PDA connected to a mobile phone or even a portable PC connected to a mobile phone. The term M-Commerce is all about wireless E-Commerce

    Free Mobile phone

    • 3438 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    CASE BRIEF Title of Case: Stoneridge Investment Partners‚ LLC‚ Petitioner v. Scientific-Atlanta‚ Inc.‚ et al. 128 S. Ct. 761 (2008) Facts: The plaintiff‚ Stoneridge Investment Partners‚ LLC‚ presented a securities fraud class action against the defendant‚ Charter Communications’ vendors‚ Scientific-Atlanta. Charter communications is a publicly traded cable company that services millions of customers throughout America. Charter contracts with vendors for equipment that is used for their company

    Premium Supreme Court of the United States Appeal

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The People of the State of New York V. Donald L. McCray Nature of the Case: Appeal upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of assault on a police officer and criminal use of a firearm in the 2nd degree. Concise Rule of Law: Mental Hygiene Law § 9.41 which permits persons who appear to be mentally ill and acting in a manner that threatens safety of self or others to be taken into custody. The Penal Law § 120.08 imposes strict liability with respect to the serious injury aspect

    Premium Crime Law Mental disorder

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 50