Case Analysis: Mattel and Toy Safety Introduction Mattel Corporation is the largest toy company in the world‚ a publicly traded organization with a market capitalization of over $6.5 billion‚ employing approximately 36‚000 people worldwide in 42 countries. Their products are sold in 150 nations (mattel.com). In the summer of 2007‚ Mattel suffered a major product recall incident. The first recall was the result of vendor failure in China where traces of lead paint were discovered
Premium Social responsibility Corporate social responsibility Consumer Product Safety Commission
Case #8: Mattel and Toy Safety Case # 8 Mattel and Toy Safety Do you believe that Mattel acted in a socially responsible and ethical manner in regard to the safety of its toys? What should or could Mattel have done differently‚ if anything? I do believe that Mattel took an initiative of social responsibility and acted in an ethical manner. The issue of lead paint was introduced to the business. The company then addressed it to their overseas production facilities and took all
Premium Social responsibility Mattel Paint
Case Study: Mattel and Toy Safety 1. Introduction 1. Situational Analysis Mattel Inc.‚ headquartered in El Segundo‚ California was the global leader in design‚ manufacture and marketing of toys and family products. Mattel toy lines included such best selling brands as Barbie‚ Hot Wheels‚ Matchbox‚ American Girl‚ Radica and Tyco as well as Fisher-Price brands including Little People‚ Power Wheels and a wide range of entertainment-inspired toys. In 2007‚ Mattel manufactured about
Premium Mattel
measured in terms of increasing happiness and/or reducing pain‚ where happiness and pain can be either physical or psychological. In Mattel case‚ there were many negative consequences resulting in the contaminated malfunction toys. For example‚ the excess lead paint over permissible levels in the toys can cause permanent brain damage and even death. The improper toys’ designs failed to prevent the magnets from falling out which can be swallowed by children. When more than one magnet is swallowed‚
Premium Ethics Virtue Virtue ethics
COMPANY PROFILE Mattel‚ Inc. REFERENCE CODE: 07512FFD-FF7B-47F6-98FE-6260A6CFFE32 PUBLICATION DATE: 26 Oct 2012 www.marketline.com COPYRIGHT MARKETLINE. THIS CONTENT IS A LICENSED PRODUCT AND IS NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED OR DISTRIBUTED. Mattel‚ Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Company Overview..............................................................................................3 Key Facts..............................................................................
Premium Management occupations Mattel Corporate governance
Background As a global leader in toy manufacturing and marketing‚ Mattel faces a number of potential threats to its ongoing operations. Like most firms that market products for children‚ Mattel is ever mindful of its social and ethical obligations and the target on its corporate back. This case summarizes many of the challenges that Mattel has faced over the past decade‚ including tough competition‚ changing consumer preferences and lifestyles‚ lawsuits‚ product liability issues‚ global sourcing
Premium Mattel
Principal Agents: Mattel manufacture and commercializes toys since 1945; now a day owns top brands such as Barbie‚ American Girl‚ Fisher Price‚ Hot-Wheels and Matchbox among others. In their financial for the years 2006 and 2007 they reported net sales of USD 5.6Bn and USD 5.8Bn and a net income of 592Millons and 599 respectively. Since 1959 the company had has experience manufacturing abroad; there are two types of manufacturing strategies the first are the core products (long run toys‚ such as Barbie)
Premium Quality assurance Quality control Management
MATTEL CASE I. OVERVIEW Mattel was founded in 1945 by Elliot and Ruth Handler. The couple started out making furniture to sell out of their garage. This business was a success‚ but they wanted a new business approach to remain competitive in the fast-changing world. So‚ they turned to making toys‚ and Mattel became the world’s largest toy company‚ with a revenue of $5.8 billion and a net income of $684 million in 2010. Recently‚ the company commissioned Chinese companies to produce some
Premium Mattel
1) What was Jill Barad’s primary goal for Mattel in 1996? What strategy did she choose in order to pursue these goals? Answer: The primary goal of Jill Barad for Mattel was to increase earning per shares by 15% per annum compounded before the effects of any acquisitions. The following are the 4 elements of her strategies: 1. Continue with the highly profitable practice of extending the company’s existing brands (e.g. she had plans to further develop a line of collectible Barbie dolls); 2. Develop
Premium Mattel
MATTEL’S STRATEGY AFTER ITS RECALL OF PRODUCTS MADE IN CHINA In the summer of 2007‚ Mattel‚ the largest toymaker in the US‚ saw its sales dip sharply when it recalled its Chinese-made toys several times. The recalls also led to public hearings in the US Congress‚ which significantly affected its reputation. Like other toymakers‚ Mattel had been relocating its production abroad and outsourcing the manufacture of parts and components. In 2007‚ Mattel produced 65% of its toys in China.1 In contrast
Premium Mattel 2008 Barbie