ROBERT C. BROWNING V. ARTHUR JOHNSON Project Type: Re writing of judgement Submitted to: Prof . Surabhi Rajapal Faculty‚ Contract law Submitted by: Shubhank Singh Semester II Year I Roll no. 2015- 110 NALSAR University of Law‚ Hyderabad FACTS OF THE CASE: Browning and Johnson went into an agreement of offer whereby Browning was to offer his practice and hardware to Johnson. Both sides and their lawyers trusted the agreement made to be totally legitimate and enforceable. Prior to the agreement’s
Premium Contract Consideration
Table of Contents 1) Explain briefly contribution margin. How is it calculated? 2 2) Using Budget Data‚ estimate the breakeven sales for Apple iPhone 4 3 3) Using the budget Data‚ what was the total expected cost per unit if all manufacturing and shipping overhead (both variable and fixed) were allocate to planned production? What was the actual cost per unit of production and shipping? 3 4) State the differences between a static budget and a flexible budget. Prepare Flexible budget for 160‚000
Premium Variable cost Costs Fixed cost
DENSO 1. How has DENSO’s relationship with Toyota affected its international strategy? DENSO was/is part of Toyota’s keiretsu. Toyota has a vertically integrated supply chain‚ which DENSO is part of. Toyota accounts for over half of DENSO’s business. When Toyota expanded internationally‚ DENSO had to follow to supply Toyota’s overseas plants. So Toyota initially set DENSO’s international strategy However‚ DENSO started supplying other automakers with parts. Economies of scale are equally important
Premium Automotive industry Supply chain management Management
Mystic Monk Coffee 1. Has father Daniel Mary established a future direction for the Carmelite Monks of Wyoming? What is his vision for the monastery? Mystic Monk Coffee? What is the mission of the monks? 2. Does it appear the Father Daniel Mary has set definite objective and performance targets for achieving that vision? 3. What is father prior’s strategy for achieving his vision? What competitive advantage might Mystic Monk Coffee’s strategy produce? 4. Is Mystic Monk
Premium Whole Foods Market John Mackey Monk
right in arresting the individuals. This relates to this case because like the cocaine‚ the cigarette burns are in plain view when they invited into the residents. Although there is no direct evidence that Joe’s cigarettes were the cause of Sam’s abuse‚ it is a logical presumption to conclude since he was the one possessing the Marlboros. This case can similarly be connected to the Draper v. United States 358 U.S. 307 (1958). In the Draper case‚ the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest petitioner
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Credibility Probable cause
The importance of the three cases presented in this discussion board are major to the nations history. Each showed both the need for civil right advancement and progress that was made in this area. In the Dred Scott case the issue of freedom amongst slaves was first highlight in this nations court system. It can be argued that though Dred Scott was not successful in his attempt towards freedom‚ his case was a victory for the slave population. This is because the case examined whether African American
Premium African American Black people United States
NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma‚ 468 U.S. 85 (1984)‚ was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) television plan violated the Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts. These antitrust laws were designed to prohibit group actions that restrained open competition and trade. The NCAA was an organization that regulated college athletics‚ and membership was voluntary‚ although NCAA schools were not allowed
Premium National Collegiate Athletic Association College United States
Facts: In the Case of Blackshades v. the United States‚ defendant Alex Yucel‚ a citizen of Sweden‚ was charged with computer hacking using the malware‚ “RAT‚” under his company called Blackshades. Since he is the founder of the Blackshades‚ “Rat” had sold the malicious software to 6‚000 customers. Blackshades is a malware which includes a remote tool‚ called “RAT.” With the malware‚ it enables it to control the victims’ computers. According to the plaintiff‚ the federal government‚ Blackshades
Premium Computer security Security Computer
Subashini Rajasingam v. Saravanan Thangathoray & Other Appeals [2008] 2 CLJ 1 FC Summary of the case: (4 marks) There were three appeals (02-19-2007(W)‚ 02-20-2007(W) and 02-21-2007(W)) before us and with the agreements of the parties‚ they were heard together. The parties to the three appeals were originally Hindus husband and wife; they were married pursuant to a civil ceremony of marriage that was registered on 26 July 2001 pursuant to the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (the 1976
Premium Marriage Appeal
In the case of Manning v. Grimsley‚ David Manning JR. was a spectator at a baseball game. Manning sued the Baltimore Orioles and Ross Grimsley for battery under tort law after injuries suffered from a thrown ball. In my opinion‚ the defendant did not intend harm. However‚ the defendant unintentionally caused injury to the plaintiff and is liable under the elements of negligence. Second‚ the Baltimore Orioles are liable because Grimsley was acting in the capacity of an employee at the time of the
Premium Tort Tort law