Current Event Analysis: The FBI vs. Apple A current event in need of ethical examination is the dispute between Apple and the FBI over the unlocking of a criminal’s iPhone. Following the mass shooting in San Bernardino that took the lives of many individuals in early December 2015‚ the FBI turned to the shooter’s personal iPhone data for evidence‚ however‚ were unable to bypass Apple’s security measures on their own (Lichtblau & Benner‚ 2016). Unwilling to compromise the security of data‚ and quite
Premium Federal Bureau of Investigation Security Apple Inc.
therefore is an act deemed by the court not warranted by law‚ but violative of a vested legal right. He is entitled to the remedy for which he applies. The act to establish judicial review authorizes the supreme court to “issue writs of mandamus in cases warranted by the principles and usages of law to any courts appointed by persons holding office under the authority of the United States . The secretary of state
Premium
1. The purpose of this memorandum is to outline the important aspects of the case‚ Mathews v. Eldridge‚ and write a case brief using the FIRAC method. 2. FACTS: Eldridge was first awarded benefits in June 1968. He received a questionnaire in March 1972 from the state agency charged with monitoring his medical condition. He said his condition had not improved in the questionnaire and documented treatments he received and physicians who treated him. After the agency processed his paperwork‚ they determined
Premium Medicine Health care Patient
A Brief Overview of Drones -----Based on the presentation given by Dr. John Hill and Dr. Ann Rogers The history of drones started in 1917 when Peter Cooper and Elmer A. Sperry invented the first gyroscopic stabilizer‚ which ensured airplanes to fly forward as well keeping balance. The first drone named Sperry Aerial Torpedo was born in 1917 which equipped with the gyroscopic stabilizer‚ and it can fly 50 miles with 300 pounds of bombs. Nevertheless‚ this very first drone had
Premium World War II World War I
LEGAL BRIEF OF CASE 2-3 Case name‚ citation‚ and court: Ashley County‚ Arkansas v. Pfizer‚ Inc‚ 552 F.3d 659 (8th Cir. 2009) Summary of Key Facts: An ingredient widely used in Pfizer’s products is a necessary ingredient in the manufacturing of methamphetamine in small toxic labs which are responsible for dangerous explosions‚ burns‚ and toxic fumes. Arkansas has one of the largest numbers of small toxic labs in the US and is burdened with high costs of fighting the meth epidemic and is seeking
Premium Pharmacology Medicine Drug
In the groundbreaking case Gideon vs. Wainwright we are given a prime example of a Supreme Court case and its impact on federalism. Gideon was accused of felony burglary charges after an eyewitness placed him at the scene of a robbery. Although there was no evidence of him committing the crime‚ police arrested him and charged him with the theft based solely on an eye witness report. The sequences of events that would follow would change the way states were ordered to provide due process and create
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Crime Law
Brief Background of the Study Barbecue is a food which is usually prepared and served at restaurants called barbecue houses or grill houses. Barbecue is commonly referred to as grill in which meat‚ poultry or fish (either whole or in pieces) or other food is slowly cooked in a pit or on a spit‚ using hot charcoals or hardwood as a heat source. The food is basted‚ usually with a highly seasoned sauce to keep it moist (O’connell‚ 2005). Barbecue is very popular in the Philippines and a favorite
Premium Meat Chicken Fried chicken
Principles of health education (P1‚ P2 & M1) You are a care professional considering the principles that underpin health education if it is to be effective in improving the health and wellbeing of individuals and groups. P1 Explain three different approaches to health education Choose THREE approaches from the list below: Social Marketing Role of Mass Media Community Development Two-Way Communication For each one you choose: 1. Describe what the approach is and how it aims to educate 2. Describe
Premium Assessment Transtheoretical model Health promotion
Gregg v. Georgia My Legal Brief of the Case Facts: Gregg argues that capital punishment is cruel and unusual‚ so it violates his constitutional rights protected under the Eighth Amendment. In 1972 the U.S‚ Supreme Court ruled in Furman v. Georgia‚ that the death penalty couldn’t be used in an arbitrary manner‚ in any state. Issues: Gregg‚ who was sentenced to death‚ argues that society has evolved to a point‚ where capital punishment should no longer be viewed as an acceptable form of
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Capital punishment United States
court case Binks/McKay vs the United States challenged the idea of the Fourth Amendment. The case explains the situation between Binks and McKay‚ who claimed that the FBI violated their Fourth amendment rights when the FBI searched through their Facebook messages after being suspected of being terrorists. This occured when Binks and McKay were discovered to have been communicating with a supposed ISIS member. They had claimed to have no intentions of joining the terrorist group. In this case‚ Sam
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution United States