Case 1: McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green‚ the Supreme Court holds that a charging party can prove unlawful discrimination indirectly by showing‚ for example‚ in a hiring case that: (1) the charging party is a member of a Title VII protected group; (2) he or she applied and was qualified for the position sought; (3) the job was not offered to him or her; and (4) the employer continued to seek applicants with similar qualifications. If the plaintiff can prove these four elements‚ the employer must
Premium Law United States Discrimination
chose was Wolff v. McDonnell. This case was very important because it uniformed certain rights and freedoms within correctional facilities. “Although inmates received some procedural safe-guards to protect them against the notorious abuses of disciplinary meetings‚ they did not receive all the due- process rights of a criminal trial” (Clemens‚ 2002). Nor did the Court question the right of correctional officials to revoke the good time of inmates. In this case‚ “Robert O. McDonnell‚ a prisoner‚ had
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Law United States Constitution
contractor decided to merge with McDonnell Douglas. McDonnell Douglas also produces commercial aircraft but held much less of the market share than Boeing. The intent of this paper is to describe the search and screening process Boeing used which is broken down in to three categories: legal‚ financial and operational‚ discuss the valuation criteria‚ analyze the negotiation and bidding process and determine what kind of financing Boeing used to secure McDonnell Douglas. Legal Issues When Boeing announced
Premium Boeing Airbus
The Boeing-McDonnell Douglas Merger As the two largest producers in the commercial aircraft industry‚ Boeing and Airbus have been in a long rivalry for over two decades. Because of its huge research and development cost and a volatile market demand situation‚ the large commercial aircraft industry has only a few viable producers that can successfully operate in this industry. At the end of 1996‚ there were three competitors in the industry – Airbus‚ Boeing‚ and McDonnell Douglas (MDC). When Boeing
Premium European Union
Airbus Industry and McDonnell Douglas; each of one was struggling to produce enough aircraft to satisfy a seemingly unquenchable need for passenger and freight transport around the world‚ developed in this form many kinds of aircrafts in different models and styles. Airbus is a consortium of European aircraft manufacturers formed in 1970; Boeing Company was founded in 1916 as the world’s largest private commercial aircraft manufacturer in the USA; and finally McDonnell Douglas‚ considered the third
Premium Boeing Airbus
v. Alza Corp.‚ the court found independent standing as the licensee had completely unrestricted rights to sue for infringement. The licensor‚ University of California‚ gave an exclusive license to Ciba-Geigy. Alza claimed that Ciba-Geigy lacked standing‚ but
Premium Law Patent Common law
BURNS AND MCDONNEL INTRODUCTION Burns and McDonnell ranks 26th in Fortune’s 2012 list of 100 best companies. Burns & McDonnell‚ headquartered in Kansas City‚ is a full-service engineering‚ architecture‚ construction‚ environmental and consulting solutions firm. Our multidiscipline staff of more than 3‚600 employee-owners includes engineers‚ architects‚ construction experts‚ planners‚ estimators‚ economists‚ technicians and scientists‚ representing
Premium Employment Engineering Civil engineering
ALICE M. BATCHELDER‚ Circuit Judge. Page 807 512 F.3d 807 (6th Cir. 2008) 85 U.S.P.Q.2d 1481 NCR CORPORATION‚ Plaintiff-Appellant‚ v. KORALA ASSOCIATES LTD.‚ Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-3685. United States Court of Appeals‚ Sixth Circuit. Jan. 16‚ 2008 Argued: Feb. 1‚ 2007. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Dayton. No. 04-00407-Michael R. Merz‚ Magistrate Judge. Page 808 [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Page 809 [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Page 810
Premium Automated teller machine Supreme Court of the United States Copyright infringement
if its practices are not equal and if has procedures unrelated to necessary job functions in the organization. In the case of McDonnell Douglas vs Green the Supreme Court holds that a charging party can prove unlawful discrimination indirectly by showing a failure in the organizational business process. In this case the hiring and firing of an employee‚ McDonnell Douglas was taken to court over their unethical tactics. The charging party has to only prove four things: they are a minority (protected
Premium Management United States Employment
Case Study: Schuetz v Banc One Mortg Corp This case study talks about the difference between legal fees and illegal kickbacks between mortgage barrower‚ broker‚ and lender. Bettina J. Scheutz (the barrower) thought it was unfair that she had to pay an additional $516.00 to Home Mortgage Financial Corporation (the mortgage broker) for
Premium Mortgage Mortgage loan Finance