Case Study of Samsung’s Mobile Phone Business I. Introduction For Samsung Electronics‚ 2003 was a watershed year. It successfully positioned itself as one of the world’s best mobile phone manufacturers and its products were featured all over the media. Many were calling its mobile phones as “the best gift for Christmas”1 or “the Mercedes of mobile phones.”2 Samsung’s achievements were particularly remarkable considering that its primary focus had previously been in semiconductors and home appliances
Premium Mobile phone
APPLE INC. VS SAMSUNG In Australia‚ the electronic industry is dominated by oligopoly. The two companies from the electronic industry‚ Apple Inc. and Samsung‚ control more than 46% of the market share just from smartphones which gives them dominance that has led to increased difficulties for other firms to enter the market‚ decreased prices for consumers and higher profits. The competition between these two industries also has caused uproars in employment issues‚ court cases and copyright controversies
Premium Mobile phone Smartphone Apple Inc.
(Figure 1) (Kotler & Keller‚ 2012‚ p.309)‚ Samsung Mobile tries to cover whole mobile and smartphone market. Today company’s product lineup includes almost any possible smartphone or mobile. Samsung doesn’t refuse to produce cheep & simple mobiles‚ in case that there are still popular on the market‚ as a second mobile or communication tool for children and olds‚ who is not need in high-developed smartphones. Thereby the current positioning of Samsung Mobile is to be a market leader in whole mobile
Premium Mobile phone Smartphone Motorola
decreased. Also‚ Samsung has the multiple products to sustain itself and high brand value. Besides‚ Samsung has its own advantages: Lower-cost structure: located main R&D facility and fabs at a single site High investment in R&D to maintain technology lead Multiple product segments(LCD‚ Mobile Phones) Financial stability Created high brand value 3. How much of Samsung’s performance is based on its reputed low-cost advantage? According to Exhibit 7a‚ In 2003 Samsung enjoyed a cost advantage
Premium Mobile phone China Brand
►Samsung • Assessing the opportunity and the Situation - Understanding the situation ►What was Samsung’s financial situation like? Samsung was experiencing a steep financial setback ►Who was responsible for Samsung’s situation? China was able to put cheaper products on the market ►Describe Samsung’s ‘cost-driven competitive strategy’ until the mid-1990: Samsung produced technical components for firms with better-known brands Samsung sold me-too consumer products ►What did Samsung need to
Premium Innovation Product management Marketing
Microsoft and Nokia. This ‘transformation’‚ turning Microsoft into a ‘devices and services’ company‚ is key to the company’s continuing survival‚ and would be impossible without Nokia. Here are four reasons why the acquisition had to happen: Microsoft need to keep its momentum Recent industry figures have shown Microsoft’s Windows Phone 8 posting its highest ever market share allowing the mobile OS to leapfrog BlackBerry and become the third-most popular globally. This means that Windows Phone
Premium Smartphone Windows Mobile Microsoft
Employee Retention-Talent Management Organizations need to be possessive about the employees-The stronger organization’s possessiveness –the longer are the employees are retained Abstract-Talent is the critical success factor to any organization. Talent pool management is the most challenging area to any organization. The challenge of finding‚ attracting‚ developing and retaining the right talent is taking up a major part of management and once the right talent is found the next demanding job
Premium Talent management Employment Costs
8 9.0 Conclusion…………………………..................................................................8 10.0 References…………………………..................................................................9 Executive Summary This report will discuss whether Samsung Group can establish a company in Malaysia. The report will be divided into two parts: external environment and SWOT analysis of the external
Premium South Korea Korea Samsung Electronics
superiority of Samsung over its competitors exceeded 51 per cent! The cost advantages related to raw materials may be explained by better negotiated agreements with suppliers (perhaps due to the larger volumes of purchases – comp. Fig. 5) and possibly less shipping and distribution costs that stem from the fact that Samsung’s fab facilities are geographically collocated (while competitors’ facilities are spread world-wide). In terms of labour productivity only Chinese SMIC outperformed Samsung‚ but that
Premium Cost Costs China
he Samsung Electronics Company has become the largest conglomerate in South Korea over the past decade. Net sales of the Samsung Group totaled $135 billion in 2004 and has 337 overseas operations in 58 countries. Electronic‚ finance‚ and trade and services are the three core sectors within the Samsung Group. Semiconductor products are classified into two different categories of chips‚ which are memory and logic. The net value of Samsung experienced rapid growth from 2000 to 2004‚ growing from $ 5
Premium Samsung Electronics Marketing Samsung Group