Criminal Defense Analysis CJA/354 Professor Croushore Matt Vanderwerff 6/24/13 Self-defense is the justification of the threat or use of force when an individual feels that they are in immediate or imminent danger to their life or bodily harm. The cases I researched were UNITED STATES V. PETERSON‚ 483 F.2D 1222 (D.C. CIR. 1973)‚ OPINION BY: ROBINSON‚ J. and PEOPLE V. CEBALLOS‚ 526 P.2D 241 (CAL. 1974)‚ OPINION BY: BURKE‚ J. In both cases the defenses entered a contest of self-defense. In the
Premium Criminal law Police Crime
Insanity Defense Donita Estes‚ Patrick Fostso‚ Jennia McCray‚ Yasmine McGee‚ Inga Payne CJA/354 October 22‚ 2012 Samara Belgarde‚ J.D. Insanity Defense The criminal justice system in America is one of the fair systems in the world where anyone will be innocent until proven of guilt. The whole concept of the court system emphasizes how our laws work regardless where we come from and how we look like or healthy or not anyone is entitles of due process. The idea that our justice and court system
Premium Mental disorder Insanity defense Crime
The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation‚ the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom‚ 2002). Also‚ additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also
Premium Mental disorder Crime Psychology
Insanity Defense Due to a malfunction of certain areas within a mentally deficient individual’s brain the Insanity Defense issue should be slightly altered. Reason being is simply because since they are mentally unstable they could possibly not be so cognitive to their actions. However given the fact they are human to a certain degree they have a understanding of the actions being committed. There is not an excuse for murder. There is no excuse for mangling limbs. There is no excuse for death of
Free Insanity defense Mental disorder Insanity
from arising. The definition of insanity is‚ A defense for criminal liability that asserts a lack of criminal responsibility due to mental instability (Gaines & Miller p. 81). Throughout history there have been cases‚ where people have used the insanity defense to explain their actions. Pleading insanity is difficult to accomplish‚ but this does not stop people from using this defense. There have been a couple of cases that use the insanity defense‚ but they were found to be sane at the time the
Premium Mental disorder Crime Psychiatry
supermarket. You will get the irony if you read the book. I was having some weight problems. Back then I was eating less and less and became more active‚ but instead of loosing weigh I was putting on more lbs. I knew something was wrong and the "In Defense of Food" book showed me why the so called "healthy meals" I was eating were in fact bad for my health and were causing my weight problems - One of the rules form the book is to avoid the foods which claim to be healthy. The book open my eyes o
Premium Food Nutrition The Omnivore's Dilemma
Criminal Case Defense Analysis Criminal Case Defense Analysis When a person gets arrested for a crime‚ that person will remain a suspect until proven guilty otherwise in court. This person will then have the chance to avail himself with the best legal representation available. “A defense consists of evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney(s) to show why that person should not be held liable for a criminal charge” (Schmalleger‚ 2010). Generally speaking
Premium Criminal law Insanity defense
1068 9 October 2014 Affirmative Defense In a criminal court case the defendant may choose to use an affirmative defense. An affirmative defense is one that excuses or justifies the behavior on which the lawsuit is based. When choosing an affirmative defense the defendant is admitting to the crime but saying he or she had good reason to do so. These types of defenses differ from others because the defendant must provide evidence and prove the defense. Affirmative defenses differ from state to state.
Premium Law Criminal law Insanity defense
Legal Defenses Checkpoint Elizabeth Stebbins 220 March 1‚ 2013 David McNees Legal Defenses Checkpoint Three legal defenses that could be used in court to excuse behavior are insanity‚ self-defense‚ and entrapment. Insanity is when the defendant did not know what he or she was doing at the time of the crime‚ or did not know that it was wrong. It is when the individual is not in their right mind because of mental illness or such. Usually they are sent to psychiatric facilities for treatment
Premium Criminal justice Criminal law Crime
Unit III Assessment Essays Done Over & better Essay #1: There are many defenses to criminal conduct. Self defense is when the defendant admits to committing the act but proves they did it because he or she life was in danger. Secondly‚ you have automatism and/or insanity. In this defense‚ the defendant does not get criminally punished because of mens rea‚ like sleep walking. Also‚ insanity defense is when you do not know the difference between right or wrong because of mental disease or defect. They
Premium Law Crime Insanity defense