facing Special Case No. 124/2002 in the Court of Special Judge (Dacoity) Gwalior for offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC‚ Section 25/27 of Arms Act and Section 11/13 of MPDVPK Act. 2. In that Court Mamta was examined on 21.3.03 as prosecution witness and she is alleged to be eye-witness of the incident. 3. Thereafter‚ she submitted an affidavit on 31 .3.2010 in the trial court in favour of the present applicant and co-accused stating therein that when her statement was recorded
Premium Ratio decidendi Jury Stare decisis
The Constitution together with s10 of the National Prosecuting Authority Act stipulates that a National Director of Public Prosecutions‚ who is the director of public prosecutions is appointed by the president‚ as the head of the national executive. In Democratic Alliance v President the issue was whether the appointment of Menzi Simelane as the Director of Public Prosecutions by the President of the Republic of South Africa was within the bounds of the Constitution. The Minister for Justice and Constitutional
Free President of the United States United States Constitution Separation of powers
Havelock interprets the settings and points out how the artists depicted the role of women through visual hierarchy and figure poses. Havelock continues to describe the role of women within this time period with the help of literary writings such as Medea and authors like Aristotle. Throughout ancient Greece there is an abundance of art and sculpture to study but what is lacking is the depiction of women in that art. Havelock refers to the temple of Zeus as to way to show cultural attitudes surrounding
Premium Zeus Woman Gender
committing a criminal offence‚ but this presumption is allowed to be rebutted. That is‚ the prosecution may be able to show that the child‚ at the time of the alleged offence‚ actually knew that their act was seriously wrong‚ and not just “naughty.” * The rebuttable presumption recognizes that children of this age might have the mental capacity to understand the seriousness of their act‚ but only if the prosecution can prove beyond doubt. * Evidence
Premium Crime Criminal law
law system. An adversarial trial allows the accused or defendant to be given a fair chance to prove his or her innocence. The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution states that the defendant is to be given a fair chance to oppose the prosecution‚ have witnesses to help with his or her defense‚ face and question the complainant‚ and for his or her case to be heard by a group of people who are unbiased and impartial. This group is known as the trial jury. Jury Selection. To start the process
Premium Jury
Walking through the ruins of the Coliseum‚ I was filled with awe. How could a society that existed 2500 years ago plan and construct something so structurally stable‚ with the ability to outlive architecture created using advanced technology? Amongst the concrete jungle of the twenty-first century stands Rome‚ a glorious‚ immutable imprint of the past. Ancient History is the foundation of our society and its influence is inescapable‚ whether we look to politics‚ theatre‚ religion‚ philosophy or language
Premium History Roman Empire Ancient Rome
Opening Statements are defined as the information presented to the jury by both the prosecution and the defense attorney; solely to advise the jury of what each side intends to prove and how they will provide that information. Opening statements are evidence or verdict‚ this process allows the prosecution to state what they are going to prove and how their proof relates to the case. For example the prosecutions opening statement would be: my intentions here today is to prove that the stand accused
Premium Jury Crime Court
431 N.Y.S.2d 422‚ 429 (1980) (error for prosecution to withhold immunity from defense witnesses who asserted fifth amendment only after prosecution threatened to prosecute them for perjury if they testified). Other courts have suggested the same result in dictum or have been reversed for ordering the prosecution to choose between granting use immunity and another sanction. See Earl v. United States‚ 361 F.2d 531‚ 534 n.1 (D.C. Cir. 1966) (suggesting prosecution cannot grant transactional immunity to
Premium Law United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
programs prosecutors provide victims with emotional support‚ information regarding the criminal justice system‚ and referrals to social service and legal assistance organizations in effort to promote the victim’s willingness to participate in the prosecution of cases (State of Nevada Advisory Council for Prosecuting ‚ 2006). I will not say that victim witness programs are a waste of time and resources‚ however I do not think they are necessary. I do not think they are necessary because many domestic
Premium Crime Criminal justice Police
`There is little point in using the general term ‘European witch-hunt’. It is misleading as it implies that a common pattern of witchcraft causation and prosecution existed throughout European Society‚ where none‚ in fact existed.` How far do you agree with this view of the witchcraft persecutions in Europe 1450-1650? The “European Witch Hunts” of early modern Europe have been subject to much speculation and historical interpretation since their peak period‚ between the late 15th and 17th century
Premium Witchcraft Witch-hunt Salem witch trials