TRESPASS TO LAND BUKIT LENANG DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD v. TELEKOM MALAYSIA BHD & ORS [2012] 1 CLJ FACTS The plaintiff purchased a land from Oakfield Enterprises Sdn Bhd through a sale and purchase agreement dated 15 May 1996. The plaintiff was aware at that time of the presence of squatters on the land. Following the said purchase‚ the plaintiff commenced eviction proceedings against the squatters and succeeded in obtaining judgment where the court ordered that the squatters surrender vacant possession
Premium Trademark Trademark infringement Tort law
Safan Nizar Ali Dauva Professor Kurt S. Odenwald Business Law and Ethics February 17‚ 2011 Week 6 Assignment Chapter 23 Question no.5 Answer: No. CP Clare did not seek to improve the deal to take advantage of IRI’s sunk costs; rather it sought to enforce the bargain. And it did not take unexpected action against which IRI could not have defended. That a manufacturer will want to reassess its sales structure as volume grows must be understood by everyone--especially by a professional sales
Premium Tort Tort law
Grade: A University of London LLB‚ 2nd year Tort Law Question Amber Valley Primary School was closed 6 months ago by Amber Borough Council (ABC)‚ the local education authority‚ which owns all the land and buildings. The school has been standing empty while ABC attempts to find a buyer for the site. Although ABC placed fencing around the site‚ local residents reported that youths had broken into the site on a number of occasions. Last week a group of youths from a nearby young offenders
Premium Tort Tort law
Discussion Questions 1. What is the primary objective of IBM’s advertising? How have the objectives of its advertising changed over the years? In one perspective the initial primary objective of IBM’s advertising is to recapture brand equity to increase its diminishing market share. Plunging from one of the market leader during 70’s and 80’s to almost a market looser in the 90’s‚ IBM’s rebranding aims at the value proposition in the mind of the consumers. Defeated by the rivals such as Microsoft
Premium Advertising Marketing Brand
Chair of Law Principles of law TORTS Term paper Authors: Annie Ivanova FN: 13114161 Miroslav Milkov FN: 13114173 Sofia‚ 2014 1 Contents I. II. Definition and overview……………………….…………………………………………..3 History 1. Roman law……………………………………………………………………………………3 2. Medieval period…………………..……………………………………………………….3 3. United states influence…………………………………………………………………4 4. Modern development…………………………………………………………………..4 III. Comparative law and conflict of laws 1. Comparative
Premium Tort Common law
University of Cambridge Faculty of law Tripos INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Breach of Confidence/Trade Secrets Lionel Bently March 10 & March11‚ 2011: The Basics April 28: Employees May 2: Privacy and Publicity March 7 and 11‚ 2011 BREACH OF CONFIDENCE: THE BASICS Bently & Sherman (3d ed)‚ 1003-1066 ***Coco v Clark [1969] RPC 41 *A-G v Guardian (No.2) [1988] 3 All ER 545 **Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 **Douglas v Hello [2008] 1 AC 1‚ 45-50 (paras 108-28 per
Premium
Understanding the Price: Cost Issues in Medical Ethics By: S. Michael Robinson PHL 310 MacDowell Understanding the Price: Cost Issues in Medical Ethics Medical ethicists contend with scores of contentious and controversial issues‚ yet no issue affects such a broad sector of the population as issues of medical cost and cost responsibility. Beyond mere policy debate‚ an ethical analysis of medical costs must consider all aspects of health‚ from research‚ practice methodology‚ and public health
Premium Health care Health economics Medicine
Lawrence Lazarus [pic] Has a woman sole rights over what to do with her own body? Considerer this question in relation to abortion 2006 Most moral issues in medicine and healthcare will instigate lively debate‚ but no subject seems to inflame tempers more than the question of abortion. The gulf between pro-life and pro-choice can be an uncompromising stance of deeply held beliefs and principles. On the one hand‚ there is the claim that the foetus is a human being with the same right to
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Human rights
There are numerous ethical issues that a medical assistant may encounter in a daily office or hospital setting. It is unethical to have a conversation with a fellow coworker regarding a patient. The patient may overhear or worse they may be related to someone in the office. It is no one’s business as to why the patient had an appointment. Another unethical behavior that is unacceptable is foul language in front of the patients. They do not need to hear that kind of language under any circumstances
Premium Patient Health care Health care provider
general partnership. 1. Limited partners do not play an active role in the business 2. Limited partners are not personally liable 3. Limited partners face slightly different tax rules (NOLO) BB is not a formalized company under the laws of corporation and taxation‚ so in turn each individual can be held liable for the debt legally. However‚ Dracca should not have gone after Ms. Grey solely on a tip of her wealth. Business Judgment Rule The Business Judgment Rule states that
Premium Corporation Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Types of business entity