Ethics Case Assignment From Diane’s perspective: 1) Relevant facts: * She is planning on not recording overtime worked * Policy is clear that employees must accurately record the time worked 2) Ethical Issue: * Working overtime and not recording your hours worked 3) Who is being Affected and How: * Diane: Could lose her job‚ Hours of work‚ violating the firms policy‚ placing will in the position to violate the firms policy‚ may have similar circumstances in the future
Premium Ethics Audit Financial audit
Re: Intentional torts‚ negligence‚ and strict liability ASSIGNMENT Explain the general differences between intentional torts‚ negligence‚ and strict liability. Additionally‚ explain the elements of intentional torts and negligence and provide working examples to illustrate each. FACTS 1. Intentional torts are actions with the purpose or intention to injure another person or that person’s property. The person inflicting the harm is called a tortfeasor. Intentional torts
Premium Tort Tort law Common law
Taken to the Limits: Pain‚ Identity and Self-Transformation Winslade argues that it is morally and legally impermissible to violate a competent patients right to refuse medical treatment. Through examples such as Dax Cowart‚ Winslade suggests that one should have the right to choose or refuse treatment rather than being forced to endure unwanted pain. Although he accepts the idea that Dax’s family members‚ doctors‚ and lawyers wanted to preserve Dax’s life for the possibility of a brighter
Premium Ethics Physician Rights
------------------------------------------------- Indian Contract Act 1872 The law relating to contracts in India is contained in Indian Contract Act‚ 1872. The Act was passed by British India and is based on the principles of English Common Law. It is applicable to the All the States of India except the State of Jammu & Kashmir. It determines the circumstances in which promise made by the parties to a contract shall be legally binding on them. All of us enter into a number of contracts everyday
Premium Contract
shows. In their first Board of Directors’ (BOD) meeting‚ CUB decided to issue their shares to the public. In the same meeting‚ the directors have decided to terminate Tyra’s employment prematurely. Giselle subscribes 30‚000 units of shares of CUB. Six months later‚ the BOD have decided that the company should venture into new businesses. The businesses that they have in mind are manufacturing and selling beauty products and liquor. For this purposes‚ CUB entered into a contract to purchase three
Premium Corporation Management Breach of contract
protection. Read Chapter 40‚ "Consumer Law" Read the following chapter in Business Law and the Legal Environment: •chapter 40 ("Consumer Law") Then respond to the following points in your notebook: •What is the role of the FTC? •Describe prohibited sales activities under the FTC Act. •How is consumer credit regulated? •What is the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act? •What government regulations apply to consumer product safety? Consumer Law-statutes that protect consumers from the unscrupulous
Premium Fair Credit Reporting Act Debt Credit
Negligent Tort Negligence is neglect or disregard. Tort is a legal misgiving. Negligent tort is a type of tort in the legal system. The concept encompasses that of which an occasion where an individual’s “acts leading to injury are neither expected nor intended.” (Yell‚ 1999) In this paper‚ the elements of a negligent tort‚ the concepts of proximate causation and duty of care‚ and types of remedies for finding tort liability will be explored. Elements of Negligent Tort There are three
Premium Tort Law Tort law
Ethics in Healthcare Tranieka M. Jenkins Pima Medical Institute English 101 June 11‚ 2015 Kelly Heisinger Ethics in Healthcare Healthcare is a diverse field with many specialties‚ but a commonality in all aspects is provider’s ethics. Ethics means following the standards and guidelines set by institutions as it relates to job duties‚ professional behavior‚ and patients. The decisions made by healthcare professionals‚ be it physicians‚ nurses or medical staff‚ affect real people and may mean
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy
LGST101: Business Law AY 2011-2012‚ Term 1 Group 8 Project Written Analysis Tort of Negligence Prepared for: Professor Melvyn Chew Written By: Jamie Lim Jia Qi (#12) Joel Koh Yong Kiat (#14) Low Hwan Hong (#23) Oh Zhan Yuan (#24) Ong Hui Ming Maria Nicolette (#25) G12 Throughout the course of this report‚ to determine if the plaintiff is owed a duty of care in negligence‚ we will adhere by the Singapore single test of negligence laid out in the case of Spandeck Engineering
Premium Tort Tort law Negligence
GROUP ASSIGNMENT 8: Tort of Negligence Issue 1: Chew’s Losses - $300‚000‚ Anxiety‚ Medical bills and the Closure of his stall. Suing Chew under misrepresentation A special relationship between Chew and Don [Hedley Byrne v Heller] Representor has reasonable grounds to believe his statement was true. Is a term; as Chew would not invest in the bonds if not for Don’s words. Sue for negligent misrepresentation (Using “But-for” test to assess damages) Suing under the Tort of Negligence‚ Chew has
Premium Tort Tort law Negligence