WHY? Brief Background on Merck & Co. Performance Appraisal System The past and existing performance appraisal of Merck & Co. was ineffective to identify and reward performance to a certain extent. Although the company was paying their employees around seven to eight percent more than the average compensation in other large companies‚ the performance appraisal system did not clearly identified outstanding performance‚ which caused inequity in rewarding performance and led to unhappiness among
Premium Human resource management Performance Assessment
Merck & Co.‚ Inc. Case If one hold a key to resolve a very serious problem‚ one has a responsibility to put an effort to make it happen‚ at least try one’s best. In this case‚ river blindness disease was a very serious problem‚ and Dr. Vagelos was the one who could make a decision as to whether the research and development of a human version of ivermectin should be carried on‚ then it was his responsibility to pursue it. Caused by a parasitic worm carried by a tiny black fly‚ the disease
Premium Blindness Human Onchocerciasis
Merck & Co.‚ Inc (A) (The summary is based on the article in Vol. I and does not include the extra readings given by the professor) This case is a classic example of enterprises trying to balance their business of increasing profits and expected social responsibilities. This dilemma is further accentuated when the company happens to be a pharma company whose decisions directly affect people’s lives. The Dilemma: A possible drug for River Blindness‚ a disease which affects almost 85 million
Premium Pharmacology Medicine Affect
Merck & Co Case Analysis 1. Problem Statement – Merck & Co ‘s stock market performance had trailed that of competitors in light of the concerns that company was not able to adapt to the changes in environment where as competitors was using their aggressive marketing functional unit as their competitive edge. Company also failed to take advantage of its own market opportunities especially the outcome of aftermarket studies of drugs they launched .Company was very late in adapting to
Premium Organizational structure Marketing Product management
How has Merck been able to achieve substantial returns to capital given the large costs and lengthy time to develop a new drug? Merck had a 14% increase in sales between 1997 and 1998 and 22% increase in sales from 1998 – 1999‚ and a 13% annual increase in earnings over the same period. Merck’s business strategy consists of two parts: (1) developing and marketing new drugs through internal research‚ and (2) developing partnerships with smaller biotechnology companies. Since 1995‚ Merck had launched
Premium Management Education Psychology
Pada tahun 2005‚ Clark Richard menjadi CEO Merck & Co. Sedikitnya lebih dari satu tahun kemudian‚ CEO Pfizer Inc bernama Clark Kindler Jeffrey telah bergabung dengan Merck pada tahun 1972 dan berasal dari latar belakang industri‚ sedangkan Kindler telah bergabung dengan Pfizer dari McDonald’s pada tahun 2002 sebagai konsultan hukum umum. Seperti CEO mereka‚ kedua perusahaan itu secara historis mengikuti jalur yang sangat berbeda; Merck dikenal karena keahlian penelitian‚ sedangkan Pfizer dianggap
Premium
The Case Against Merck and Co.‚ Inc. Chris Brefeld August 2‚ 2010 The Case of Merck and Co.‚ Inc. Merck and Co.‚ Inc. is one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world with a market capitalization of over $110 billion dollars. The company describes itself as a global research-driven pharmaceutical company that discovers‚ develops‚ manufactures‚ and markets vaccines and medicines to address unmet medical needs. The company also makes an effort to increase access to its medicine
Premium Atherosclerosis Pharmaceutical industry Clinical trial
Matthews‚ Ph.D. February 10‚ 2004 Applying Ethics to the Merck Case The purpose of my essay is to show whether the business decisions made by the management team of Merck pharmaceutical are ethical. Using corporate assets for charitable purposes‚ the company manufactures and distributes a drug called Mectizan at no charge to impoverished nations and their inhabitants. I will expound on three ethical theories and then analyze the Merck case according to each theory‚ summarizing how the authors and
Premium Ethics Morality
1.0 Introduction Merck & co also know as Merck Sharp & Dohme‚ MSD outside the United States and Canada. Merck is known internationally as an American pharmceutical giant. In 1668‚ in Germany‚ a drug store had been purchased by Jacob Friedrich Merck fom whom it originates and later on Emanuel Merck had taken over the store in 1816. Merck is not only one of the largest pharmaceutical companies but also has published many series of medical reference books. Merck had always been admired worldwide for
Premium Coca-Cola Pharmaceutical industry Diet Coke
Inc.‚ a large pharmaceutical product and service company. The dilemma arose in the 1970s when a potential breakthrough was discovered for river blindness. They had developed and produced a drug for animals named Invermectin. It was discovered that this
Premium Fortune 500 Fortune 500 Drug