The actions Merck undertook when marketing Vioxx and emphasizing its safety even after finding out the product’s side effects endangered all its key stakeholders and showed the real face of the company that accented its highly ethical maxims. Cardiovascular side effects of the Vioxx increased the risk of complications that could have caused patient’s death‚ therefore Merck violated the basic right to life of all the Vioxx consumers. It was already mentioned that Vioxx caused 3468 deaths by heart
Premium Enron Business ethics Ethics
MGT 4083-Technology Strategy Case Analysis Merck & Co.: Evaluating a Drug Licensing Opportunity Introduction: Davanrik is a new drug developed by LAB Pharmaceuticals‚ which has the potential to treat depression and obesity. Davanrik was initially developed to treat depression by stimulating the receptor in the serotonin system that promotes anti-depression. However‚ it was discovered that Davanrik also blocks the receptor that causes hunger. LAB Pharmaceuticals obtained a patent for Davanrik
Premium
Prescription drugs are drugs that save millions of people’s lives everyday. Many people depend on these things in order to keep them alive. Although‚ major pharmaceuticals companies view this as a very dependable way of receiving capital‚ having to need these things in order to live another day. Since people most of time need this drug in order to survive they are willing to pay thousands of dollars just so they could live another day. There are many people who require these specific things in
Premium Pharmacology Medicine Pharmaceutical drug
Merck‚ the FDA‚ and the Vioxx Recall 1. Do you believe that Merck acted in a socially responsible and ethical manner with regard to Vioxx? Why or Why not? In your answer‚ please address the company’s drug development and testing‚ marketing and advertising‚ relationships with government regulators and policymakers‚ and handling of the recall. I do not believe that Merck made a socially responsible decision when Vioxx was introduced into the pharmaceutical market. Scientists that were involved
Premium Pharmacology
10/6/2014 Case 3: Merck and River Blindness 1. Why was Merck hesitant about developing a human version of Ivermectin? Merck considered this opportunity as a high risk investment. The cost of developing the drug was estimated at $100 million. Even if it was successful to cure river blindness the victims were too poor to afford the drug. There was no way to distribute it in these rural areas were the victims were located. In addition‚ there was a possibility that people would misuse the drugs‚ which would
Premium Onchocerciasis Human
Issued * Conclusion * References INTRODUCTION Compulsory licensing is when a government allows someone else to produce the patented product without the consent of the patent owner. The patent owner still enjoys the rights over patent .He is paid by the Licensee some amount as a royalty for his patent. The TRIPS Agreement list a number of conditions for issuing compulsory licenses. 1. Normally the person or company applying for a license has to have tried to negotiate a voluntary license
Premium Patent Royalties Patent law
Effects of Leadership in the Management Strategies of Merck and Company‚ Inc. Rana Satnani MGT-330 Management: Theory‚ Practice‚ and Application. July 2‚ 2010 Carolyn Harrison There lies a division in the business world between managers who “do things right” and leaders who “do the right things” (Bennis‚ 2007‚ p. 13). The primary difference between good managers and fantastic leaders is the ability to take risks and make independent decisions. Ethical leadership is more important today than
Premium Leadership Management Business ethics
Acquisition between Merck and Schering-Plough Introduction On March 9‚ 2009‚ Merck & Co.‚ Inc. and Schering-Plough Corporation announced that their Boards of Directors have unanimously approved a definitive merger agreement under which Merck and Schering-Plough will combine‚ under the name Merck in a stock and cash transaction. As the two companies’ combined 2008 revenues were $47 billion. The deal officially closed on November 3‚ 2009. Background of the two parties Merck & Co. (NYSE: MRK)
Premium
Merck and river blindness are a good example for Utilitarianism theory because the results brought happiness for both the company and the people. Utilitarianism is an ethical framework that focuses on the outcomes or results of actions. In fact‚ its name comes from the Greek word Telos‚ which means “end.” The two most influential developers of the utilitarian viewpoint were Englishmen Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806–1873). Under this framework‚ acting ethically means making
Premium John Stuart Mill Ethics Jeremy Bentham
Good deeds reframe bad deeds. Moral Licensing - justifying actions that are immoral‚ unethical‚ or otherwise problematic by doing good deeds in the past – has been documented in various domains in our lives. Revisionist History showed that several examples of moral licensing existing in politics‚ and I was curious about whether moral licensing also affected supporters of Barak Obama – the first African American president in US history. Case 1 – Election of the first African American President America’s
Premium African American Race Black people