MERCK: OPEN FOR INNOVATION? Founded in 1891 as an American subsidiary of his German namesake‚ Merck was once considered the “undisputed king of the pharmaceutical industry with ground‐ breaking drugs”(The Chief Executive 2003). But for the last decade‚ Merck has gone through a period of stagnation; it began to lose exclusivity patents on blockbuster drugs and has witnessed Pfizer’s rise to top place in the industry. It seemed now that internal R&D that was once the company’s main asset would
Premium Pharmaceutical industry
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Statement of the Problem Merck & Co.‚ Inc.‚ a leading pharmaceutical company‚ faces the threat of the patents of its most popular drugs expiring in 2002. The only way to counter the loss of sales from these drugs going off patent is to develop new drugs in order to refresh the company’s portfolio. LAB Pharmaceuticals‚ a small pharmaceutical company who specializes in the treatment of neurological disorders‚ has approached Merck with the opportunity to license Davanrik‚ a new
Premium Patent Pharmacology Pharmaceutical drug
Merck‚ the FDA‚ and the VIOXX Recall MBA 520-D4C2 Ethics & Leadership in a Global Environment April 22‚ 2012 Merck and Vioxx Recall Did Merck act in social and ethical manner? In 2005‚ Merck was ranked fourth in sales among pharmaceutical companies. Merck had released the drug Vioxx‚ for treating Osteoarthritis in late 1990. Merck as a company has a reputation of being one of the most ethical and
Premium Marketing Brand Management
In the year 2000‚ Merck produced a controversial product called Vioxx. Four years later it gained worldwide attention because of the drug’s potential cardiovascular risks. This was detrimental to the company’s reputation because it was alleged Merck knowingly distributed Vioxx despite its risk. Both Barbara Martinez and Anne W. Mathews of the Wall Street Journal wrote articles into the investigation of Vioxx. Their article suggests Merck knew the dangers of Vioxx at an early stage of its clinical
Premium Clinical trial
Introduction and Situational Analysis Merck and River Blindness ethical dilemma is whether to pursue research that may or may affect the profits‚ or to choose a safer choice and go for profit rather than researching the drug. The outcome from researching the drug could possibly lead to healing the deadly and dangerous disease known as River Blindness. This drug is known to kill the parasite that has caused the disease. The problem with this situation was that the consumers of the drug could not pay
Premium Pharmacology Medicine Ethics
Merck is a global research-driven pharmaceutical company dedicated to putting patients first. Merck’s highest priority areas are Alzheimer’s disease‚ atherosclerosis‚ cardiovascular disease‚ diabetes‚ novel vaccines‚ obesity‚ oncology‚ pain and sleep disorders. In addition‚ and importantly for licensing‚ the following other areas remain of high interest for focused investment in new compounds and mechanisms: antibiotics‚ antifungals‚ antivirals (HCV and HIV)‚ asthma‚ COPD‚ neurodegeneration‚ ophthalmology
Premium RNA Protein Immune system
3rd‚ 2014 Case 5: Merck‚ the FDA‚ and the Vioxx Recall Section I Merck was one of the world’s leading pharmaceutical firms. The company ranked 4th I sales after Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson and it ranked 5th in assets and market value. Merck ranked 1st in profits‚ earning $7.33 billion on $30.78 billion in sales. In 2006‚ Merck faced major challenges with their once best selling prescription painkillers‚ Vioxx which was pulled off the market in September of 2004 after Merck learned it increased
Free Pharmacology Food and Drug Administration
patent. In 1995‚ Merck entered into a licensed agreement and collaboration to hold the rights to market Gardisil in all countries accept Australia and New Zealand. Merck was invested heavily in Gardasil‚ spending $1.2 billion in fifteen years before seeking approval from the FDA. After results of all phase trials were impressive‚ Merck moved for FDA approval. Merck hoped to receive approval before a competitive drug‚ known as Cervarix was approved. If so‚ it would guarantee Mercks first mover advantage
Premium Human papillomavirus HPV vaccine Cervical cancer
Case Study: Merck Acquisition of Medco Professor Daniel Weiss FI561 January 23‚ 2011 Case Study: Merck Acquisition of Medco Abstract The purpose of this case study is to determine whether it would be beneficial to merge Merck Corporation with Medco Containment Services Incorporated. The merger and acquisition between the world’s largest drug manufacturer and the largest prescription benefits management company (PBM) and marketer of mail order medicines in the United States would result
Premium Mergers and acquisitions Due diligence
Merck (MRK) experienced only minute changes over the period that I held onto it. During this time‚ Merck experienced both positives and negatives‚ and these different experiences helped to balance the value of the company’s stock. At the beginning of the year‚ Merck successfully “acquired IOmet‚” a company that produces “innovative medicines for the treatment of cancer.” With this new subsidiary‚ Merck will most likely experience an increase in profits
Premium Balance sheet Financial ratios Generally Accepted Accounting Principles