Case #1: Merck and River Blindness MGT 597: Leadership Ethics Dr. Brandon Randolph-Seng Javiaur Harmon: Winter Mini 2014 - 2015 1. Think about the definition stakeholders—any parties with a stake in the organization’s actions or performance. Who are the stakeholders in this situation? How many can you list? On what basis would you rank them in importance? The stakeholders in this situation were the employees (research scientists doing the R&D)‚ Merck‚ and the target audience which
Premium Value system Risk Intrinsic value
Questions for the Merck Case Create a decision tree for Merck. The 2 leftmost branches would identify the alternatives related to licensing Davarink (specifically license versus not to license). Next‚ if Merck decides to pursue license‚ they go into phase I which results in a success‚ or failure. Phase I success is followed by phase II where Merck has the opportunity to develop the drug to treat depression alone‚ weight loss alone‚ or both‚ or contemplate phase II failure. Finally phase
Premium Decision tree Decision theory
Executive Summary Merck & Company has been presented with an opportunity to invest $30 million for the purchasing rights of an obesity and high cholesterol lowering drug‚ KL-798 from Kappa Labs. Based on the expected probabilities of success through each product-development phase for this new drug‚ as well as the costs involved‚ the net present value of the project is -$1.16 million and is therefore recommended that Merck passes on the investment. Sensitivity analysis also show that adjusting
Premium Clinical trial Net present value Investment
Merck & Co.‚ Inc (A) (The summary is based on the article in Vol. I and does not include the extra readings given by the professor) This case is a classic example of enterprises trying to balance their business of increasing profits and expected social responsibilities. This dilemma is further accentuated when the company happens to be a pharma company whose decisions directly affect people’s lives. The Dilemma: A possible drug for River Blindness‚ a disease which affects almost 85 million
Premium Pharmacology Medicine Affect
Q1. How does Merck evaluate the effectiveness of its ethics-related activities? Merck has a strong sense of ethics within the company ’s credo and morals and also reflects on its employees. In spite of having major financial crisis‚ its motto never changed or got altered. It increased the finding to the research institutions in Africa and places. It made sure that the motto of the George W. Merck‚ former Chairman and son of the founder of Merck was always above any hurdles that Merck as a company
Premium Pharmacology Clinical trial Pharmaceutical industry
Running head: CASE STUDY: MERCK & COMPANY: THE VIOXX RECALL Merck & Company: The Vioxx Recall Albert Balogun California Baptist University BUS 520A: Managerial Ethics Jim Bishop‚ PhD June 30‚ 2010 Merck & Company: The Vioxx Recall The issues involved in Merck‚ a pharmaceutical manufacturing company’s recall of one its products‚ Vioxx‚ is the effect of direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising of prescription drug on the society public
Premium Pharmacology Food and Drug Administration Pharmaceutical industry
1. THE CASE Operations manager of the Cure Lanka Hospital (CLH) K. P. John‚ stoop up after a long discussion with the HR Manager Dayan Randeni. “Well Dayan we will have to take this matter up seriously in the next management meeting‚ I need a solution‚ a permanent solution”. Dayan agreed with waving the head from left to right with thin smile drawn across the face. It was the weekly operational review meeting of CLH; meeting was preceded by the CEO Samath Devadithi. He is an ex-Air force officer
Premium Management Organizational culture Human resource management
patent. In 1995‚ Merck entered into a licensed agreement and collaboration to hold the rights to market Gardisil in all countries accept Australia and New Zealand. Merck was invested heavily in Gardasil‚ spending $1.2 billion in fifteen years before seeking approval from the FDA. After results of all phase trials were impressive‚ Merck moved for FDA approval. Merck hoped to receive approval before a competitive drug‚ known as Cervarix was approved. If so‚ it would guarantee Mercks first mover advantage
Premium Human papillomavirus HPV vaccine Cervical cancer
MGT 4083-Technology Strategy Case Analysis Merck & Co.: Evaluating a Drug Licensing Opportunity Introduction: Davanrik is a new drug developed by LAB Pharmaceuticals‚ which has the potential to treat depression and obesity. Davanrik was initially developed to treat depression by stimulating the receptor in the serotonin system that promotes anti-depression. However‚ it was discovered that Davanrik also blocks the receptor that causes hunger. LAB Pharmaceuticals obtained a patent for Davanrik
Premium
How has Merck been able to achieve substantial returns to capital given the large costs and lengthy time to develop a new drug? Merck had a 14% increase in sales between 1997 and 1998 and 22% increase in sales from 1998 – 1999‚ and a 13% annual increase in earnings over the same period. Merck’s business strategy consists of two parts: (1) developing and marketing new drugs through internal research‚ and (2) developing partnerships with smaller biotechnology companies. Since 1995‚ Merck had launched
Premium Management Education Psychology