The Milgram ExperimentOne of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology was carried out by Stanley Milgram (1963). Stanley Milgram‚ a psychologist at Yale University‚ conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. The experiments began in July 1961‚ a year after the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram devised the experiment to answer the question "Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust
Free Milgram experiment Stanley Milgram Stanford prison experiment
information-processing individuals‚ albeit operating in a social context. Cognitive social psychology aims to investigate the thoughts processes (cognitions) of individuals‚ the main methods of doing this are experimentation and social psychometric testing. Experiments involve controlled scenarios in which the researcher manipulates the variables they want to test. Social psychometric testing involves questionnaires that are filled in by participants to test their responses to specific questions. Both these provide
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Sociology
AP Psychology Ethics Essay Ethical Issues Arising from Social Experiments The following experiments were unethical to the participants. Some of their treatment was inhumane. The experiments broke moral principles and rules of conduct. There are many examples and evidence when these following events occurred. Such as in The Milgram Obedience experiment the participants were put through intentional deception. In A Class Divided: Jane Elliot‚ the participants (students) were put into high stress
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
to disturb the experiment. Third participants assumed discomfort was mild and temporary. Last aspect is that participants can discuss choices with someone else. Describe one ethical issue raised in Milgram’s study. One ethical issue from the Milgram study is harm. Participants believed that they were giving another human being extreme shocks. Due to this participants experienced anxiety and extreme stress. Describe what steps Milgram took to deal with this ethical issue Milgram debriefed the
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
1) “Milgrams`s research is of no value because it was conducted in a laboratory” Discuss the methodological difficulties faced by social psychologists conducting research in a laboratory (5 marks) |Have you? Please tick. | | | |Made your point
Premium Social psychology Milgram experiment Social influence
psychologist wrote‚ "Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience‚" while working at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California. In her review‚ Baumrind discusses phenomena which occurred in Milgram’s Obedience Experiment. She briefly presents a case against Milgram by questioning the ethicality of Milgram’s experiment. In addition‚ Baumrind provides excerpts of Milgram’s own observations from which she deducts that Milgram seems unemotionally disturbed by his subjects’
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Stanley Milgram
shock the experimenter would sternly order them to continue with the experiment. The experimenter‚ who was the authority figure in the experiment used a number of verbal prompts to encourage the participants to continue with the experiment. After the experiment had been done the participants were fully interrogated on what Milgram’s true intention was and followed up a year later to check on their psychological states. Milgram remarkably found that 100% of the participants administered electric
Free Psychology Stanford prison experiment Social psychology
ethics of Milgram’s obedience study. In the years 1961-1962‚ Stanley Milgram - Yale University psychologist‚ conducted the first of the obedience experiments‚ which were also called "shock" studies. The research was invented to check if the people would be ready to harm somebody just to meet the requirements of the experiment. This essay will be focused on the ethical side of the study. Firstly‚ it will be presented how the experiment was performed‚ by describing all of the necessary details. The two
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
The experiment was about people will respond to authority. In the experiment the teacher who is to obey the order of the authority who was the experimenter also the learner who was the recipient of incentive from the teacher. The teacher was given lists of words to teach the student‚ (learner) and the teacher have to read the original word given him also‚ read the four answers. What the learner would do was to press a button to show his answer. And‚ if the answer was wrong‚ the teacher would shock
Premium Education Teacher Psychology
Milgram (1963) claimed that destructive obedience is not a consequence of moral weakness or an evil character; rather it is a response to a particular set of situational factors. Evaluate this statement. In order to evaluate this statement it is important to first understand what Milgram meant. This essay will first consider what is meant by destructive obedience and briefly look at Milgram’s work. It will then look at what is inferred by situational factors‚ focusing on conformity‚ socialisation
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Psychology