individuals but products of conformity. Stanley Milgram‚ a Yale psychologist‚ engineered an experiment to test the ordinary person’s level of obedience. Many of Milgram’s colleagues admired his intricate experiment‚ and thought that he provided valid information on the complexity of obedience. One of his colleagues‚ Diana Baumrind‚ however‚ strongly disagreed with Milgram and has good reasons to criticize his experiment. She thought his experiment was unethical and very harmful to the social well-being
Premium Psychology Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment
Behavioral Study of Obedience by Milgram (1963) Background: Some type of authority is necessary when humans live together and obedience is currently a very relevant concept. Throughout World War II‚ millions of people were killed through gas chambers and death camps. Although there was a mastermind behind the plan‚ there needed to be a huge amount of people to carry out the deeds. Some think that this is an ingrained behavior that can override ethical values‚ sympathy‚ and morality. Obedience should
Premium Psychology World War II Milgram experiment
tell you to do something and you did it without even considering otherwise? From an early age‚ we are conditioned to respond immediately when an authority figure gives us an order. For this reason‚ I chose an article about a reproduction of the Milgram study that took place in 1963 and established that people will go to extreme lengths to obey authority. The Holocaust was the motivation behind Milgram’s study and we are all knowledgeable of the atrocities ordered by Hitler (Simplepsychology‚ n
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Psychology
Describe and evaluate Milgram’s study into obedience Milgram (1963)’s aim was to see the levels of obedience to authority‚ he recruited 40 male participants by advertising for volunteers on newspaper to take part of a study of memory at Yale University. Each individual was paid $4.50 and was told that they would receive this money even if they quit during the study. The participants were always the teachers and confederates were the learners. The participants were told that if the learner got
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
While assessing the Stanford Prison Simulation encounter‚ I noticed a lot of ethical issues that stemmed from the Psychologist researchers and the guards as well. First and foremost‚ there were no clear instructions as to what the guards should do to get results for the research and there were no adamant clear instructions as to what the guards could not do to the prisoner’s. The purpose of research is to measure data and its outcome‚ and ensuring the protection and safety of the subjects involved
Premium Prison Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
Violation of Basic Human Rights using the Stanford Prison Experiment Ethical issues in Psychology For this paper‚ I will explore the ethical issues in Psychology‚ more specifically the violation of basic human rights in the example of the Stanford Prison Experiment. The following questions will be addressed: Was the Stanford Prison Experiment worth the consequences it had on the participants? Was it morally right to put the participants in these conditions
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Ethics
Evaluate Milgrams research into obedience. Stanley Milgram (1963) explains why 65% of the people did something they felt was morally wrong‚ that is they went into an agentic state and exhibited some aspects of denial in order to avoid moral strain. However‚ Milgram does not explain why 65% did not obey. In other words‚ it does not explain individual differences as the volunteers in Milgrams experiment seemed to resist the pressure and Milgram does not explain that. To continue‚ the experiment lacked
Premium Ethics Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
disobedience‚ while humanists stress the primacy of the individual conscience. The legal and philosophic aspects of obedience are of enormous import‚ but they say very little about how most people behave in concrete situations. I set up a simple experiment at Yale University to test how much pain an ordinary citizen would inflict on another person simply because he was ordered to by an experimental scientist. Stark authority was pitted against the subjects’ strongest moral imperatives against hurting
Premium Milgram experiment Philosophy Psychology
Stanley Milgram conducted an examination‚ in the 60’s‚ based on the justification for the acts of genocide offered by those who were accused in the Nuremberg War Criminal Trials of WWII. Their defense‚ as they claimed was solely based on “obedience” and that they were in fact only following their superior’s orders. This eventually led to the study on the conflict between obedience toward authority and one’s personal conscious. His experiment was a model of simplicity. The idea was to take an ‘experimenter’
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
situations. The results of the Milgram‚ Asch‚ and Zimbardo studies can teach us to avoid abuses of power in the future. The first study discussed was conducted by Stanley Milgram‚ and it looked at how far a participant would go in hurting another human when told to do so by the researcher in charge. Sometimes subjects gave what was supposed to be a potentially lethal jolt of electricity when told to by the researcher. The lesson that can be gained from this experiment is that people will follow directions
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Psychology