1. The general idea of the article is about a mock prison experiment conducted by Doctor Zimbardo. The research was to identify the psychological causes of aggression and violence‚ and to observe the variables that promoted such behaviour in prison. He did this by using two groups of people that were randomly assigned as either a prisoner or a prison guard. The hypothesis that is focused upon to provide an explanation to the conditions in prisons is the dispositional hypothesis. The dispositional
Premium Stanford prison experiment Stanford prison experiment Aggression
them with the fire extinguisher. The ringleader of the riot was put into solitary confinement by the guards. After only 36 hours‚ one prisoner #8612 then began to act crazy‚ to scream‚ to curse‚ to go into a rage that seemed The Standford Prison Experiment Psychology 1 out of control. It took quite a while before they became convinced that he was really suffering and that they had to release him. Guards forced the prisoners to repeat their assigned numbers in order to reinforce the idea
Premium Prison Stanford prison experiment The Prisoner
Design of experiments via Taguchi methods: orthogonal arrays Introduction The Taguchi method involves reducing the variation in a process through robust design of experiments. The overall objective of the method is to produce high quality product at low cost to the manufacturer. The Taguchi method was developed by Dr. Genichi Taguchi of Japan who maintained that variation. Therefore‚ poor quality in a process affects not only the manufacturer but also society. He developed a method for designing
Premium Taguchi methods Design of experiments
Obedience is omnipresent; it is difficult to differentiate between obedience and conformity‚ therefore it is a complicated subject of social psychology. However‚ Stanley Milgram was very keen to understand the phenomena of obedience‚ and created a dramatic masterpiece. Stanley Milgram is a key figure in psychology; he was interested in many different aspects of life‚ however his work on the field of obedience is highly valued and still exiting for both psychologists and lay people. The aim of this
Premium Psychology Social psychology Milgram experiment
In an unconditioned response‚ the stimulus from the environment does not contribute to anything to signify a response. When a response is conditioned‚ the external factor is associated with a specific behavior. In the Little Albert Experiment‚ Albert was exposed to various cues ranging from a white rat‚ a rabbit‚ a dog‚ a monkey‚ masks (with and without hair)‚ cotton‚ wool‚ burning newspapers‚ and other various stimulus. Albert showed no signs of fear‚ and did not really react to any
Premium Classical conditioning Consciousness Psychoanalysis
Stanley Milgram’s (1963) study of behavioral obedience sought to understand the nature that drives humans to submit to destructive obedience. In his study‚ Milgram deceived his subject volunteers into believing that the experiment they were submitting themselves to involved learning about the effects of punishment on learning. Under this pretext‚ a subject “teacher” was to administer electric shocks to a confederate “learner” for every wrong answer in a word-pairing exercise. The subject was to administer
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
extreme by examining a study done by a social psychologist‚ Stanley Milgram‚ involving the effects of discipline. In the essay‚ "If Hitler Asked You to Electrocute a Stranger‚ Would You? Probably"‚ Meyer takes a look at Milgram’s study that mimics the execution of the Jews (among others) during World War II by placing a series of subjects under similar conditions of stress‚ authority‚ and obedience. The main theme of this experiment is giving subjects the impression that they are shocking an individual
Premium Appeal to emotion Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
of Obedience"‚ Stanley Milgram asserts that obedience to authority is a common response for many people in today’s society‚ often diminishing an individuals beliefs or ideals. Stanley Milgram designs an experiment to understand how strong a person’s tendency to obey authority is‚ even though it is amoral or destructive. Stanley Milgram bases his experiment on three people: a learner‚ teacher‚ and experimenter. The experimenter is simply an overseer of the experiment‚ and is concerned with
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Psychology
Milgram (1963) claimed that destructive obedience is not a consequence of moral weakness or an evil character; rather it is a response to a particular set of situational factors. Evaluate this statement. In order to evaluate this statement it is important to first understand what Milgram meant. This essay will first consider what is meant by destructive obedience and briefly look at Milgram’s work. It will then look at what is inferred by situational factors‚ focusing on conformity‚ socialisation
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Psychology
291)‚ but also scientists like Stanley Milgram (Milgram‚ 1965‚ p. 59). These assurances are important to study to be able to understand the psychological effects that these types of relationships have. The first thing that will be examined is Stanley Milgram’s original experiment. Milgram’s experiment was conducted at Yale University‚ this experiment consisted of “forty males between the ages of twenty and fifty” (1963‚ p. 2). These men came to the experiment
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Cambodia