prison make the inner demon come out in the prisoner/guard or is the prisoner /guard already wired that way? The Stanford Prison Experiment was a study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. This experiment was led by a psychology professor named Philip Zimbardo‚ he had the help of a team of researchers. The purpose of this particular experiment was to induce disorientation‚ depersonalization‚ and DE individualization in the participants. After a period of time behind bars
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Philip Zimbardo
Obedience to Authority As a child growing up‚ everyone was told “respect your elders” or “listen and obey”. As children grow into teenagers‚ they start pushing the boundaries to see who they really need to obey. Throughout adulthood‚ though people have fewer and fewer authority figures as the years go by‚ everyone must obey someone. Though we all have someone to obey‚ when does the respectful obedience cross the line into dangerous territory? Obedience becomes dangerous when it becomes physically
Premium Milgram experiment Psychology Stanford prison experiment
Experiments and war are not often thought of being similar. Experiments are thought to be sterile‚ civilianized‚ and controlled; with men in pristine white coats rushing about carrying test tubes and clipboards. On the other hand‚ war is chaotic and anarchic; filled with disease‚ death‚ and suffering. War is bloodshed and loss; while experiments are organized and precise. Psychological experiments can be used to simulate warlike tendencies and behaviors. The Milgram Obedience Experiment‚ tests how
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
In 1971‚ The Stanford Prision Experiment was performed in order to see behind two contrasting behaviors that humans can show in a power driven institution. The point was to understand aggressive behavior typically shown by guards or people in the position of power using it to hold reign over the prisoners who in turn respond with submissiveness‚ and see how this relates in real world situations. Achievement of conclusion was the information gathered by the role play of students in an exercise of
Premium Stanford prison experiment Prison Milgram experiment
In our society‚ there are many social norms we are expected to abide by. These unwritten rules and standards of behavior often go unnoticed‚ leaving society to take them for granted. We only become truly aware of the norms of society when they are actually violated. When a violation occurs‚ those who continue to conform may respond with positive or negative sanctions‚ such as humor‚ alarm‚ irritation‚ fear‚ or a wide variety of emotions. Our society also relies on language as its major bases for
Premium Sociology Norm Heteronormativity
The Stanford Prison experiment‚ in my opinion is a remarkable experiment . It isn’t ethical in the least but the results that have emerged have exceeded even what Mr.Zimbardo set out to do. The aim of seeing whether people change their basic personalities ‚ moralities ‚ values when subjected to an external hostile environment has been successfully proven. My honest opinion is that ‚ at that time in 1971 ‚ it was rational enough to think about going out of the way to get an answer to a particular
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
In the article entitled “Think for Yourself: The Danger of Blind Obedience‚” Michael Hess discusses the tendency that people have to follow rules without thinking of the implications of their actions – or inaction. Particularly‚ Hess discusses this type of conformity within the confines of business settings. He uses an example of an emergency dispatcher‚ who’s employer prohibited her from performing CPR or offering similar help to those in need. She denied help to a woman who had stopped breathing
Premium Psychology Social psychology Milgram experiment
Serious Questions about the Stanford Prison Experiment July 15‚ 2008 The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) by Phil Zimbardo has been for me an example of the astonishing things that we humans are capable of. I guess as an example of human gullibility‚ I had not been skeptical about the experiment‚ which lacks quite a few scientific markers (aside from its ethical problems). During a talk by Barbara Oakley‚ she was asked to comment about the SPE because it showed the influence the situation and roles
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
The Stanford Prison Experiment‚ conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo‚ was performed to see the process that takes place where guards and prisoners "learn" to become authoritarian guards and compliant prisoners. (Zimbardo‚ 732). The prisoners and guards had many burdens of disobedience. In the beginning of the experiment‚ the "prisoners" were stripped of everything and emotionally torn down for being "disobedient". They were dehumanized in every way. They couldn’t speak to another unless they called
Premium Stanford prison experiment Philip Zimbardo Milgram experiment
The articles “The Stanford Prison Experiment” written by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience” composed by Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton both focus on the effects of power. In which the subjects have been ordered to follow something by superiors. In the experiment the original group of subjects are divided into the role of guards‚ and inmates. The massacre‚ however‚ was not an experiment but was the result of an order issued by a higher ranking official
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Philip Zimbardo