is a time where we may judge and not agree while others may not pass a judgment and be in agreement. In the study of Psychology we look to a researchers finding to prove the way we respond to emotional‚ environmental and societal changes. Stanley Milgram a researcher that set out on the behalf of Yale University conducted a study to determine how obedient we become when driven or motivated by authority to inflict mild to severe pain is applied. Milgram’s study creates a huge debate in ethics. The
Premium Stanford prison experiment Emotion Psychology
Outline and Evaluate one or more explanations of why people obey It has been found by Milgram that people obey for four main reasons these are; legitimate authority‚ the momentum of compliance‚ the agentic shift and passivity. The first reason that Milgram found that people obey is because people feel like they have to obey someone if they have a high social status or a highly respected job‚ this is called legitimate authority. Bickman (1974) supported this theory by doing an experiment on the
Premium Nazi Germany Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
a controversial topic. Throughout the article “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram‚ a Yale psychologist‚ people become aware of the necessity to obey higher authority no matter what pain they are causing to another person. Throughout the article we find out that social life is about obeying others and how conservative people who obey are threats to society and how humanists are individuals. Stanley Milgram sets up a study to see how far people will go to obey what they are being told to
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
In The Perils of Obedience‚ Stanley Milgram expresses his findings of an experiment he conducted trying to prove the lengths people will go to be obedient to authority. The first experiments included a group of undergraduates from Yale. The experiments involved three subjects: the experimenter‚ the “teacher” and the “learner”. The teacher would read off a series of words. The learner‚ who is strapped to an electric chair‚ would be required to remember the words associated to one another. If the
Premium Education Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment
Research supports Milgram’s evidence‚ that without deception he would have had incorrect results. Rosenhan (1966) copied the study and people had heard of Milgram’s experiment and Rosenhan’s results were 70% as participants thought it was true. Milgram in his defence again explained if the participants were to know the truth that the experiment was not real‚ the results would have been different and this would have affected the end result. The ethical concerns in the experiment were also argued
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
The article named ‘’Review of Stanley Milgramss Experiments on Obedience’’ by Diana Baumrind looks at Milgrams experiment of learning‚ and then discusses whether Milgram violated the rights of his subjects‚ or did a beneficial experiment for humanity. In the article‚ the procedure of the experiment in a laboratory is described. It involves a participant who gives a victim increasing electric shocks as punishments in the context of a learning experiment. In this environment some of the subjects
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
through the eyes of a older man. With the war over we still search the reasons why so many millions were able to take such horrible orders and carry them out just because they were told to. In recent years we have been able to turn the findings of the Milgram Experiment and a experiment done by a group of students at Stanford to try and understand more how people make choices. When you look at Frankl’s book and the two experiments it can be hard to decipher what each really means‚ if humans do have the
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
Stanley Milgram ’s Experiment In Stanley Milgram ’s essay Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority‚ the self-proclaimed "social psychologist" conducted a study while working as a psychologist at Yale University. The primary goal of Milgram ’s experiment was to measure the desire of the participants to shock a learner in a controlled situation. The experiment was based on three primary roles: the authoritative figure‚ the learner‚ and the teachers. The authoritative figure instructed
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
The Perils of Obedience by Stanley Milgram‚ was an experiment done on people to study the idea of obedience. However‚ a huge part in the research was the participant’s in the study had thought that the point of the experiment was how the learner’s responded to the given requests‚ not themselves. The experimenter has two participant’s given two pieces of paper to choose one from‚ both of the pieces of paper have ‘teacher’ written on them. The learner is actually a part of the research team to help
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
Milgram (1963) claimed that destructive obedience is not a consequence of moral weakness or an evil character; rather it is a response to a particular set of situational factors. Evaluate this statement. In order to evaluate this statement it is important to first understand what Milgram meant. This essay will first consider what is meant by destructive obedience and briefly look at Milgram’s work. It will then look at what is inferred by situational factors‚ focusing on conformity‚ socialisation
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Psychology