In 1968‚ Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television‚ Inc.‚ 392 U. S. 390‚ the Court determined that a CATV provider was more like a viewer than a broadcaster‚ because its system “no more than enhances the viewer’s capacity to receive the broadcaster’s sig¬nals by providing a well-located antenna with an efficient connec¬tion to the viewer’s television set.” Therefore‚ the Supreme Court held that a CATV provider does not violate the exclusive right of the copyright holder and hence did not perform
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law United States
Easy Corp was awarded a five year contract to provide program office support to a government agency. In the first year of the contract‚ the enterprise has raised concern with the contracting officer’s representative (COR). Easy Corp has habitually submitted erroneous and often late invoices‚ as well as late and incomplete management reports. Moreover‚ both the COR and Easy Corp employees rarely see the program manager for the contract. The purpose of this paper is to identify the ramifications
Premium Federal government of the United States Receipt United States Department of Defense
Herman Miller‚ Inc. Case – Page C-319 Herman Miller‚ Inc. is a company that specializes in the production and manufacture of modern office furniture. The company began its reputation through product innovation and production processes which started in the 1920’s. In the path of their success‚ Herman Miller‚ Inc. has been able to pursue a path distinctively marked by reinvention and by renewal. I would say that in the beginning the company pursued a focused low-cost strategy. The initial items
Premium Inventory Incentive program Working capital
http://www.studymode.com/subjects/souter-v-shyamba-pty-ltd-page1.html Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd (1897)- company is a separate legal entity Lee v Lee’s Air Farming (1961) Case Summary: The facts disclosed that in 1954‚ Mr. Lee had formed the respondent company carrying on the business of crop spraying from the air. Mr. Lee owned 2‚999 of the company’s 3‚000 shares. Apart from that‚ he also was the company’s governing director whereby he had appointed himself as the only pilot of the company
Premium Employment
Jews were allowed to move to Israel but the Soviet Union refused to let the Jews who wanted to leave go . So this this led to long lines at the Israeli missions and these were shown on television. This lead to a lot of speculation about how the Soviet Union was treating the Jews the problem was why would they want to leave the Soviet
Premium World War II Great Depression Unemployment
Assignment #4 – R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC Sarah Barnard February 26‚ 2012 Business Employment Law - HRM 510 Dr. Zelphia A. Brown‚ SPHR‚ Instructor Assignment # 4- R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC 1. What were the legal issues in this case? This case is based around the laws and regulations of OSHA. OSHA is an Occupational Safety and Health Act that has been put into place to ensure the safety of employees while on the job. These regulations are put into place to help
Premium Occupational safety and health
Asfar and Co v Blundell (1896) 1 QB 123 Court of Appeal (Lord Esher MR‚ Lopes and Kay LJJ) Dates no longer merchantable as dates Facts A vessel‚ on board which dates had been shipped‚ was sunk during the course of the voyage‚ and subsequently raised. On arrival at the port of discharge it was found that‚ although the dates still retained the appearance of dates‚ and although they were of some value for the purpose of distillation into spirit‚ they were so impregnated with sewage and in such a
Premium Shipping Cargo Transport
Bàitập 1 – Chương 1 HãyđọccácđoạntríchtrongbảnánvàxácđịnhcácnguồnluậtvàTòaánđãsửdụng Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd From Wikipedia‚ the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Broderip v Salomon) Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 is a landmark1 UK company law case. The effect of the Lords ’ unanimous 2 ruling was to uphold 3firmly the doctrine4 of corporate personality‚ as set out in the Companies Act 1862‚ so that creditors of an insolvent company could not sue the company ’s shareholders
Premium Corporation
Who Won The Battle? The Women’s Liberation Movement is the social debate that sought to remove forms of domination based on gender. For the last 100 years‚ it has been a worldwide debate. During Women’s Liberation‚ society made people believe that women were only meant to be housewives and be obedient to their husbands. Women were not considered smart enough for education‚ strong enough for sports‚ or wise enough for out-of-home jobs. As the women of this time felt that society was being sexist
Premium Gender Women's suffrage Woman
In this case‚ I can confirm that Amanda is the offeror who had replied to Tracy’s
Premium Contract Invitation to treat