value of an individual’s property. In order to exercise this jurisdiction‚ the plaintiff must have seized and attached the property. In an effort to expand jurisdiction‚ the court instituted the minimum contacts test. This test was expanded by Hess v. Pawloski‚ when a Massachusetts court determined that due his activities within the state‚ a nonresident of Massachusetts was still subject to the court’s jurisdiction‚ regarding a suit for a traffic accident. The court held that use of a state’s highways
Premium Jurisdiction Civil procedure
Gonzales v. Raich In the case of Gonzales v. Raich‚ the Supreme Court made a judgment that affected the California users of medical marijuana. Under a law the federal Controlled Substance Act‚ marijuana is a schedule one controlled substance‚ however under a 1996 state California law‚ marijuana is legalized for usage for people who have a prescription from a doctor for medical usage. When the federal Drug Enforcement Administration enforced the CSA by destroying one of the defendant’s marijuana
Premium United States United States Congress Law
CLAW1001: Commercial Transactions A Case Analysis Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 44 Submitted by: Sindhuja Shankar SID: 305 127 950 3/10/2007 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Case Summary 3 Facts 3 Issues 3 Ratio 3 Decision 4 Critical Analysis 4 Commercial Implications 5 Legal Implications 6 Conclusion 6 Bibliography 7 Appendix † Research Plan 8 Introduction The case Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd[1] confirms the long held doctrine that employers are vicariously
Premium Law Agency Employment
TIFFANY & CO. ® Introduction Tiffany & Co. is a leading US luxury jewelry company. For more than 150 years‚ Tiffany & Co. have been designing exquisite jewelry that highlights the incomparable beauty of diamonds. The designations TIFFANY ® and TIFFANY & CO. ® are the principal trademarks of Tiffany‚ as well as serving as trade names. Through its subsidiaries‚ the Company has obtained and is the proprietor of trademark registrations for TIFFANY ® and TIFFANY & CO. ®‚ as well as the TIFFANY BLUE
Premium Jewellery Diamond Engagement ring
Some people believe that co-education should not be there. In their opinion this can lead to attraction between boys and girls which are neither good for their health‚ nor character‚ nor studies. Some other people are of the view that co-education can bring about a healthy competition between boys and girls. It can mean better discipline since in the presence of girls the boys will not talk irrelevantly or obscenely in the class. The most potent argument advanced by co-education lovers is that
Premium Gender Classroom Education
and crisscrossing the country with the final stop in Pittsburgh in February 2013. The album hits stores and tickets go on sale via ticketmaster.com or at event centers in cities where tour hits starting November 1‚ 2012. The all female group who has been together for four years consists of band members Brenna Doughertry‚ lead singer‚ and sisters Linda Bannon‚ Laura Bannon‚ and Lisa Bannon. “I Hit a Boy” is their debut album following well-known and highly successful singles such as‚ “So Over
Premium Release The Beatles Rock music
RENO v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION US Supreme Court‚ 1997 1. Claim: Attorney General Janet Reno‚ the appellant appealed directly to the Supreme Court as provided for by the Act’s special review provisions against the appellee‚ ACLU. 2. Facts: The 1996 Federal Communications Decency Act sought to protect minors from “indecent” and offensive Internet materials. The Act made it a crime to transmit obscene or indecent messages over the Internet. Immediately after the CDA became law‚ twenty
Premium Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution United States
Finally‚ on July 27‚ 2000‚ Marie Villette (plaintiff) had a carport installed from Sheldorado Aluminum Product (defendant). The covering would collapse six months later on top of the plaintiffs Mercedes Benz. All the plaintiff is requesting is the $3‚000 she has spent on the carport. Ms. Villette filed a lawsuit opposing Sheldorado expecting the return of her $3000. Ms. Villette and Sheldorado‚ had no formal written contract‚ however‚ there was a bill of sale; it is dated 11 July‚ 2000. Ms. Villette
Premium Contract Law Contract law
for trespass to her bedroom and communal areas: Cowell v Rosehill Racecourse (1937) 56 CLR 605 ENTERING BEDROOM‚ PLACING PLANTS ON FLOOR Presumably‚ Donald intended (Nickells v Melbourne Corporation (1938) 59 CLR 219) the direct interferences (Southport Corp v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd [1954] 2 QB 182 (‘Southport’)) of entering Alexis’s bedroom and placing plants on the floor. Donald interfered by entering Alexis’s room without authority (Plenty v Dillon (1991) 171 CLR 635 (‘Plenty’)) as Alexis revoked
Premium Law Tort Property
stay strong to the end of time as we made our final march onto the field. The drum major steps onto the podium and gazes at all of us‚ this is our time to show them who we are‚ the Blue Stars. I realized that this experience will stick with me for a lifetime and will affect me wherever I go. The first time I tried out for drum corps was a terrifying experience. My mother had to
Premium American films 2008 albums Time