The Boeing 7E7 Team 14 Constantine Brocoum Courtney Delia Stephanie Doherty David Dubois Radu Oprea October 15th‚ 2009 Contents Objectives 1 Management Summary 1 Cost of Equity 1 Equity Market Risk Premium 1 Beta 2 Risk Free Rate 2 Capital Structure Weights 2 Boeing 7E7 Project Evaluation 4 Circumstances for an economically attractive project 4 Market Demand 4 Market Share 4 Sensitivity Analysis 4 Conclusion 7 Board approval for the project? 7 Appendices 7 Appendix
Premium Stock market Weighted average cost of capital
6/14/2003 Chapter 11 Mini Case Situation Shrieves Casting Company is considering adding a new line to its product mix‚ and the capital budgeting analysis is being conducted by Sidney Johnson‚ a recently graduated MBA. The production line would be set up in unused space in Shrieves ’ main plant. The machinery’s invoice price would be approximately $200‚000; another $10‚000 in shipping charges would be required; and it would cost an additional $30‚000 to install the equipment. The machinery has
Premium Depreciation Cash flow
decisions‚ amount of financing‚ business risk‚ constant financial risk‚ and dividend policy. These factors have a direct impact on the variables used in calculating WACC. Such variables include the term structure of interest rate‚ the risk free rate‚ the beta‚ the market risk premium‚ the firm’s marginal tax rate‚ and its capital structure. Since Boeing has two business componentsdefense and commercialfirst begin by determining the unlevered beta for its commercial component. This is accomplished
Premium Stock market Capital structure Financial ratios
qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfgh jklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvb nmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwer tyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfg
Premium Airline Boeing 787 Boeing Commercial Airplanes
segment respectively‚ while Boeing only had 46%of revenues derived from this area; these four companies are not sufficiently similar. In addition‚ the commercial airline segment was depressed by the terrorism events and SARS‚ and the defense segment benefited from the Iraq war; as a result‚ it is too optimistic to use the beta of comparable companies. To take the crisis of the commercial airline market into account‚ it is more appropriate to use the estimated beta of Boeing according to past 60 trading
Premium Net present value Weighted average cost of capital Internal rate of return
NPV Versus IRR W.L. Silber I. Our favorite project A has the following cash flows: -1000 0 0 1 0 2 +300 3 +600 4 +900 5 We know that if the cost of capital is 18 percent we reject the project because the net present value is negative: - 1000 + 300 600 900 + + = NPV 3 4 (1.18) (1.18) (1.18)5 - 1000 + 182.59 + 309.47 + 393.40 = -114.54 We also know that at a cost of capital of 8% we accept the project because the net present value is positive: - 1000 + 300 600 900
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Cash flow
present value the net present value (NPV) or net present worth (NPW)[of a time series of cash flows‚ both incoming and outgoing‚ is defined as the sum of the present values (PVs) of the individual cash flows of the same entity. In the case when all future cash flows are incoming (such as coupons and principal of a bond) and the only outflow of cash is the purchase price‚ the NPV is simply the PV of future cash flows minus the purchase price (which is its own PV). NPV is a central tool in discounted cash
Premium Net present value
assembly costs are also considerably huge‚ usually there are more than a few manufacturers and hence transportation and assembly of the final parts are increased in addition to the added problems or organizing the transportation operations‚ in the case of the 767 parts were transported from as far away as Japan to Seattle. To offset these costs airplane manufacturers usually rely on developing a platform every decade or more and producing as many derivatives from that platform as possible. In designing
Premium Boeing 707 Boeing 787 Boeing 747
Boeing 767 Case Study Questions 1. How would you describe Boeing’s approach to project management? What are its strengths and weaknesses? Boeing adopts a very thorough‚ well planned out process to manage the project. The stages are defined clearly and tasks involved in each stage are carried out sequentially. The first stage of their approach is the project definition phase during which Boeing identified holes in the market not met by existing planes‚ assessed future airline needs‚ considered alternative
Premium Project management Engineering
FIN-516 – WEEK 2 – MINI – CASE ASSIGNMENT 1. What is the name of the company? What is the industry sector? General Electric Industrial Goods 2. What are the operating risks of the company? 3. What is the financial risk of the company (the LT debt to total capitalization ratio)? Debt to equity = Total debt ÷ GE shareowners’ equity = 11‚589 ÷ 116‚438 = 0.10 4. Does the company have any preferred stock? (shares/book value/market price and value) GE does not have any preferred
Premium Dividend yield Stock market Generally Accepted Accounting Principles