No 502‚ June 2002 Jurajda‚ S King‚ R.G. and Levine‚ R. “Finance and Growth: Schumpter Might be Right”‚ Quarterly Journal of Economics‚ 1993a‚ 108‚ pp717-738 Kirby‚ D.A Kocenda‚ E. and Svenjar‚ J. “The Impact of Czech Mass Privatisation on Corporate Governance”‚ MCB University Press‚ Journal of Economic Studies‚ Vol 30‚ No ¾‚ 2003‚ pp278293 Levine‚ Ross McKinnon‚ Ronald. Money and Capital in Economic Development‚ Chapter 7: Financial Repression and Inflation‚ Washington D.C.‚ The Brookings Institution
Premium Economics
some research on the Internet about what has happened with Enron. Now apply the three questions used to test the merits of a winning strategy (text p13) to Enron. Describe the strategic management failure in Enron that led it into its demise? Enron was formed in 1986 from the merger of natural gas pipeline companies Houston Natural Gas and Internorth. At the time of filing for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection in December 2001‚ Enron had a portfolio of diversified activities ranging from the transportation
Premium Enron scandal Natural gas Pipeline transport
Corporate governance is defined as the distribution of power in the company. In the 1990s‚ the great success of US economy let to the efforts to understand and copy American management methods. The Anglo-American view of corporate governance derives from generating long term economic gain to enhance shareholder value. An outside board of directors is hired. The boards of US companies are made up of friends and acquaintances of the CEO. The use of stock options ’ is another feature introduced
Premium Stock Stock market Corporate governance
The overall cause for Enron’s bankruptcy should be blamed on former chairman and CEO‚ Kenneth Lay. As an Enron executive‚ all of Lay’s concerns should have been focused on Enron’s profits‚ but all he cared about was his property. When he noticed Enron’s financial problem‚ he did not attempt to fix it‚ but made effort to maintain his own benefit and ignored the whole company’s and investors’ loss. His selfish and unethical behavior not only deceived the investors but also finally resulted in Enron’s
Premium Corporation Corporate governance Management
THE COLLAPSE OF ENRON August 11 2008 [Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.] FROM PERSPECTIVE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS PAGE NO. Introduction 3 Background of Enron 3 Enron Business Model 4 Summary of transactions & Partnerships
Premium Enron Enron scandal Corporate governance
Natural Gas‚ became CEO‚ and the next year won the post of chairman. From the pipeline sector‚ Enron began moving into new fields. In 1999‚ the company launched its broadband services unit and Enron Online‚ the company’s website for trading commodities‚ which soon became the largest business site in the world. About 90 per cent of its income eventually came from trades over Enron Online. Growth for Enron was rapid. In 2000‚ the company’s annual revenue reached $100 billion US. It ranked as the seventh-largest
Premium Enron Jeffrey Skilling Kenneth Lay
Enter IT Governance: Why? What? How? Why do organization need IT Governance? One of the goals of IT Governance (ITG) is to balance the functional needs of the business with the (technical) needs of the IT organization. In other words: ITG needs to ensure that the business gets from IT what they need (which is
Premium Rooms Family Mother
Business Ethics Enron Case 1. Using the options market more for gambling purposes to cover loss rather than insurance. The culture was if one of their employees was making a lot of money they didn’t ask questions they didn’t look too deep into where the money was going they eventually gave these people more money to spend and use‚ what they realized later on was that that employee wasn’t very good. They were just lucky one time. They made some losses and had to get that loss back so they put
Premium Enron
Corporate Governance in India: Disciplining the Dominant Shareholder Abstract The nascent debate on corporate governance in India has tended to draw heavily on the large Anglo-American literature on the subject. This paper argues however that the corporate governance problems in India are very different. The governance issue in the US or the UK is essentially that of disciplining the management who have ceased to be effectively accountable to the owners. The problem in the Indian corporate sector
Premium Stock Stock market Corporate governance
THE BENEFITS OF SARBANES-OXLEY AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MEASURED AGAINST THE COSTS Salim Motala A research project submitted to the Gordon Institute of Business Science‚ University of Pretoria‚ in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Business Administration. 14 November 2007 ABSTRACT The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is the only legislated corporate governance structure‚ and is aimed at increasing investor confidence in public companies by forcing them
Premium Corporate governance Governance