On 07/16/2017‚ at approximately 1803 hours‚ I saw a group of inmates front of cell 21 in Durnago 5 B pod. I immediately went inside the pod and saw Inmate Mendoza-Zamora‚ Luis T364150 and Inmate Fluker‚ Roy T313174 were involved in a fight in Durango 5 B-pod cell 21 located at 3225 W. Gibson Ln. Phoenix AZ 85009. Both inmates were escorted to the Durango Medical Clinic separately by myself (Officer Mahmud B3801)‚ where they refused to be evaluated by RN Michovich CH022. I watched the video on
Premium
HOOT BOOK RATIONALE Hoot‚ Carl Hiassen‚ 2002 Intended audience The novel Hoot tells the story of new kid Roy Eberhardt and his struggles to adjust to his new home of Coconut Grove‚ Florida. As he tries to do this‚ he goes on a crazy journey with two other kids‚ as they try to protect burrowing owls and their habitat from the construction of a pancake house. Hoot is a novel that is appropriate for readers who are 9 and older. Even though the book is meant for a younger audience‚ it still contains
Premium Fiction Character The Lord of the Rings
Clearance System Date of Proposal Defense: July 12‚ 2014 Time of Proposal Defense: 8:00 – 9:00 A.M. Venue of Proposal Defense: CSB2 – Room 201 Panelist Contribution to knowledge and/or conformity to regional thrusts and/or directions of the institution (30%) Soundness of the research literature in relation to the topic (30%) Applicability and/or marketability of the research outputs (25%) Presentation (15%) TOTAL (100%) Franklin Miranda Chairman Benedicto Balilo Member
Premium Information technology
Once John Doe was taken into custody‚ the correct procedural steps should have been to read John his Miranda rights. If john still chose to make a statement to the police‚ the officers would have had to require John to give a written statement‚ once his Miranda Rights were read to him and he still chose to talk then‚ everything he said could potentially be used against him. When John Doe was arrested and brought to the police station‚ then first thing that should be done is to process John
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Crime Police
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP: ITS’ RELATIONSHIP TO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School Lipa City Colleges Lipa City In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Education Submitted by YOLLIE M. ERIŃO March 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents Page Title Page i Approval Sheet ii
Premium Independent school Teacher Lipa City
ratified by the states‚ which took effect in 1791 called The Bill of Rights. Since the federal government really didn’t have much control over the people because of the Bill of Rights. So “The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution was ratified on July 9‚ 1868‚ and granted citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States‚” which included former slaves recently freed”. (The Libarary of Congress-Researchers‚ 2012) Also within The Fourteenth Amendments people could not be denied
Premium Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Miranda v. Arizona United States Constitution
produced by Wendy Finerman‚ The Devil Wears Prada. The basic plot of the movie and novel is about a plain jane‚ just out of college‚ smart‚ not fashion savvy‚ woman (Andrea Sachs) who applies for a job as junior assistant to the editor-in-chief (Miranda Priestly)‚ at a fashion icon magazine “Runway”‚ in New York and gets it. She is told repeatedly "a million girls would die for [her] job" (Finerman‚ 2006) and if she lasts a year‚ she will be able to get a job at any magazine. Andrea‚ in her own
Free Culture Popular culture The Devil Wears Prada
Miranda’s poisoned fruit tree: The admissibility of physical evidence derived from an unwarned statement. Washington Law Review‚ 78(3)‚ 757-794. Retrieved July 4‚ 2008‚ from Research Library database. (Document ID: 395361691). Ciarelli‚ S (2003). Pre-arrest silence: Minding that gap between fourth amendment stops and fifth amendment custody. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology‚ 93(2/3)‚ 651. Retrieved
Premium United States Constitution Law United States
Emily Rochon Hist 1152 Susanne Robbins 1/31/17 Texas Vs Johnson Texas V Johnson was a supreme court decision involving Gregory Lee Johnson and the state of Texas. This decision happened in 1989 on June‚ 21. The court ruled that flag burning is protected under the first amendment therefore it is not considered illegal. This decision is important because it sets a precedent for the future of protest and free “speech” including non-oral speech in the first amendment. I am interested in this case because
Premium President of the United States Richard Nixon United States
The Fifth Amendment In 1966‚ there was a supreme case called Miranda v. Arizona which the Supreme Court ruled that the fifth amendment privilege againest self incrimination requires law enforcement to advise a suspect that before a custodial interrigation‚ a suspect must be informed of both his or her privileges against incriminating oneself and to obtain an attorney. Miranda warnings must be given before any questioning by law enforcement officials. The fifth amendment was developed because the
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution