Though they were not charged specifically for assuming a false identity as was implied‚ they were charged for not taking down the postings even though they knew the testimonials were misleading. In section 139B of the CCA‚ it states that persons may be liable for actions of their employees and contractors. In this case‚ if a company in no uncertain terms asked their employees to ‘post feedback on their site as a satisfied customer’
Premium Law Psychology Society
Limited. A Federal Court judge has slammed the new legislative regime governing misleading and deceptive conduct‚ calling the framework "pointlessly technical and befuddling". When Justice Steven Rares handed down his lengthy decision on the liability of failed investment bank Lehman Brothers Australia last Friday‚ he took the opportunity to make clear what he thought of the new laws prohibiting misleading and deceptive conduct. Justice Rares found the Australian arm of the failed Wall Street giant
Premium Deception Consumer protection Common law
ADVERTISEMENT INTRODUCTION False advertising also known as deceptive advertising in which it is the use of false or misleading statements in marketing and also the falsification of the product which may takes negatively affect many stakeholders specifically customers. False advertising is a part of three mainly components: false‚ misleading and deceptive advertising. In United States‚ Federal Trade Commission (FTC) defines a false ad as "misleading in respect of a material". In other words‚ the merchandise
Premium Deception Advertising Fraud
the consumers right to be treated fairly. 2) Using misleading and deceptive practices. Impinging on the right to be well informed It has been said that Nestle have3 been blamed for misleading and deceptive practices. It has been noticed that Nestle had distributed pamphlets in Botswana‚ on which was stated that this particular infant milk formula counteracts diarrhoea and its side effects. This simply emphasizes that this is misleading practise from Nestle‚ as they claim that infants using
Premium Infant formula Breastfeeding Baby bottle
the DR center promotes its product deceptively to its massive customers. Instead of the one-shot unsafe services occurred and excessive high mark-up on prices‚ the majority reason for DR beauty center to be unethical business is the “deceptive promotion”. Deceptive promotion is the practice of misrepresenting the product’s features or performance or luring the customers to the store for a bargain that is out of stock. (Kotler & Armstrong‚ 2009) In order to push sales volume‚ two old staff of DR
Premium Ethics Sales Deception
November 1999. Basically‚ the provisions of this act cover areas not covered by other existing laws. This act provides simple and inexpensive redressal to the consumer’s grievances and relief of a specific nature for example from ‘false’‚ ‘misleading’ or ‘deceptive’ as to conduct‚ representation or practice and that they shall not be practiced by both parties (consumer and seller) whether it falls under sales‚ services or land. The laws that are designed to protect the consumers’ rights can be classified
Premium Contract Consumer protection Fraud
I would argue that the advertisement “The Foamy Spot” by Rosewood violates the FTC’s standard on deceptive advertising. A number of rules and suggestions laid out in the FTC Deception Policy Statement and the FTC Policy Statement Regarding Advertising Substantiation Program back up my claim. First off‚ the FTC Deception Policy Statement says that the Commission declares “unfair or deceptive acts or practices‚” such as the ones laid out by Rosewood in this commercial‚ as unlawful‚ and “prohibits
Premium Deception Advertising Fraud
cause harm to consumers. 1. DECEPTIVE PRACTICES Marketers are sometimes accused of deceptive practices that lead consumers to believe they will get more value than they actually do. Deceptive marketing practice fall into three groups: a. Deceptive Pricing – retail prices are kept unethically higher before extending high discounts. b. Deceptive Promotion – Misinterpreting the product’s features or performance to misguide the consumers. c. Deceptive Packaging – Exaggerating
Premium Marketing Consumer protection
not necessarily illegal (Rainer & Turban‚ 2002‚ p. 62) Society states the terms ethical and moral are not the same and used interchangeably. Here are three specific examples of ethical issues within today’s businesses. Bribery‚ embezzlement and deceptive advertising can be defined and discussed in this essay. Bribery is considered offenses related to the improper influencing of people in position of trust. Bribery is a white-collar crime‚ intentions must be clear and verified‚ and the crime
Premium Ethics Morality Business ethics
Problem Questions ------------------------------------------------- Question 1 Based on the question‚ the issue in the question is will there be a contract of sale of goods act 1895(SA) under s 1? Hence‚ the law is s 1 where a contract of goods is a contract whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property the goods to the buyer for a money consideration based on the case Toby Construction Products Pty Ltd v Computer Bar Sales Pty Ltd. The application is under s1 sale of goods
Premium Contract Tort Law